For the record....

Well, I don't want to cause trouble for you. ;)

my nineteen-year-old son is a member here, too (Spawn_of_Cloudy), although he's just started college, so isn't around much. :)

no trouble, just don't have any wish to embarrass him.
 
Thanks for your vote, Otto. And I'm impressed that you seem to be more au courant with American history than a lot of Americans.
 
Ya know... I truly love having so many on ignore... LOL

makes the political threads much easier to read

*falls over laughing my ass off*
 
Update: a recent poll of Republicans shows a preference of 64% for Sarah Palin.

Oh, Republicans, please do nominate her! 8 years of Barack Obama would really help this nation. ;):devil:

LOL

Hubbie said, "We're putting a Palin 2012 sign on our lawn."

I stared at him, aghast. "Why? As a joke?"

"No! I want her to run - so she can lose." :D

Me, I'm too afraid she'd win. All I had to do was remind him of "W"... :eek:
 
Nancy Pelosi will drag Obama into the bushes and her way with him....like Dracula with a virgin.
 
....I eventually broke down and voted for Obama. My reason? Absolute horror at the idea of another rightist government. I couldn't stand even the risk of putting another far-right candidate in the White House. We need a break from conservatism, at least. Even if it means that the Democrats will be blamed for our problems. In fact, I voted a straight Democratic ticket, just out of disgust with the GOP.

I had qualms about Obama, given his association with Tony Rezko, but I figured that I would give him a chance. After all, Chester Arthur had a corrupt reputation, but did surprisingly well.

Besides, I kind of liked the idea that my first vote as an American would put a black man in the White House.

I know that I initially planned to back Nader, but a man can change his mind, right?

Of course, living in Texas, my vote only affected the popular total, not the electoral count. :(
Jefferson said that the electorate owes it to itself to vote a party out once it has been in power twenty years.
 
Thanks for your vote, Otto. And I'm impressed that you seem to be more au courant with American history than a lot of Americans.

Thank you. That's the thing about having to study civics courses to understand one's adopted country.

As for the whole business of his foreign policy, I think that the fears of excessive pandering to Europe are unfounded. American attitudes toward other countries and institutions haven't fundamentally changed. Nor do I think that they should, aside from respecting the need for allies and multi-lateral institutions more. Each country is unique, and will always have its own outlook on its neighbors. This is a historical pattern that won't change because of one election.

As for scientific policy, I prefer to be optimistic. I look forward to one day seeing the eradication of most present diseases, though I suspect that we will then have to work on curing more such scourges. I especially hope for the end of STDs and HIV, so as to eliminate a major weapon in the cultural arsenal of the prudish element throughout the world.

If the primary sexual consequence, for good or ill, is pregnancy, not disease, then it just becomes a matter of prophylactics, contraceptives, and sterilization after once people decide not to have more children. The "wrath of God" and other inane Victorian bogeymen will be neutralized.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top