JazzManJim
On the Downbeat
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2001
- Posts
- 27,360
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
brokenbrainwave said:umm jim, that really did not prove a thing. Keep in mind I have never said there is no justification for strikes against Iraq, I am just against the US leading the way.
brokenbrainwave said:umm jim, that really did not prove a thing. Keep in mind I have never said there is no justification for strikes against Iraq, I am just against the US leading the way.
floridaguy64 said:
Tell that to the folks in NYC, DC, and PA...
Spinaroonie said:
What the fuck does that have to do with anything?
70/30 said:The foreign minister of Qatar, a key U.S. ally in the Persian Gulf, said his country did not want war in Iraq.
Thrillhouse said:
floridaguy64 said:
Plenty... it is a proven fact that Muhammed Atta met with Iraqi officials prior to coming to the US to train for, plan and complete his actions on those 4 airliners. Do you really think that Saddam just gave him advice? Maybe some of that oil money that was supposed to feed the Iraqi population?
Ahh fuckit, getting through to you is like squeezing water from a rock!
70/30 said:Limit Israeli counter.
brokenbrainwave said:so florida, we are supposed to bomb the shit out of anyone that does not like us? In that case you better be ready to stay in a constant state of war. Personally I want better for my sons.
JazzManJim said:
And yet, the US Central Command is moving its headquarters onto a rather large airbase in their country as we speak.
Can we say "blowing smoke"?
And as to why the Arab countries can't do this. Well, they can. But they won't. They have had decades to use any sort of leadership to broker peace and reign in tyrants and mass murderers, but they haven't.
It's my own opinion that they won't do this because of two reasons. First, a large democracy in their neighborhood is bad for their own personal power bases. Second, because their governments aren't very different in either structure or excersize from Iraq's.
So who else will lead? No one. No one's done it for ten years. No one did it before. As usual, the world is waiting for someone, anyone, to step up and take the lead on this. The United States is doing it, not only because we are Iraq's openly-stated target, but also because it is the right thing to do.
One other question. Exactly what hell will there be to pay for doing this? Wasn't there some sort of hell to pay threatened a year ago when we went into Afghanistan? What's happened? Well, we've killed thuosands of terrorists, deposed a brutal government, instated a democratic government and, most recently arrested yet another high-ranking al Qaeda member.
Has there been hell to pay? Well, sure. For them.
this part is extremely well put and very very true. It is really all about oil. Nothing more, nothing less.cccman said:the US doesnt have to be the policeman for the entire world. thats one of our problems. we pick and chose what to stick our noses into not based on principle but based on money. we are so concerned with overthrowing communist regimes and dictators but what about the one about 100 miles from Fla. who has been there for 50 years. why have we not liberated Cuba if its all about principle. we havent liberated Cuba because there is no real ecinomic incentive to do such. same with africa. why have we not tried to topple the warloards who slaughter thousands weekly......because africa isnt worth our return on investment. if you're gonna tout war - at least be honest in what our motivations are.
JazzManJim said:
What in the hell are you talking about?
What Israeli counter?