Food for thought for the Brits worried about Bush's involvement with ENRON.

p p man

Virgin
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Posts
18
Blair Foes Demand Inquiry on Enron

LONDON Opposition legislators in Britain are demanding formal inquiries into contacts between the Labour Party of Prime Minister Tony Blair and executives of the bankrupt Enron Corp., asserting that Enron's lobbying may have wrought policy changes that favored the U.S. energy giant's businesses here.
.
Through a spokesman, Mr. Blair on Monday rejected "absolutely" any suggestion that the government had behaved improperly in its dealings with Enron.
.
But he acknowledged that, on four occasions dating to 1998, government ministers dealing with regulatory or energy issues had met with Enron executives.
.
That was one year after Mr. Blair's party gained power.
.
A Labour party official also acknowledged that the party had accepted about $51,000 from Enron, not in cash but as sponsorship for events.
.
One of the most perilous accusations in British politics is that of "sleaze" - the label attached to officials and legislators who accept cash in return for providing rich people with access to decision-making politicians. The term dogged the closing years of the last Conservative administration before 1997.
.
One of the very first scandals of Mr. Blair's term was a party contribution from Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One car-racing chief. The money was seen as a bid to influence government policy on tobacco advertising.
.
Ralph Hodge, the former chairman of Enron Europe, told a television interviewer late Monday that it had been "custom and practice" to sponsor events to meet ministers, civil servants and legislators.
.
The money "was given in order to gain access and to at least know that you'd met the politicians concerned," he said, "and I do stress it was given to both parties." "Cash for access?" he asked. "No." But he acknowledged "a desire to meet with ministers, civil servants" and legislators.
.
"Certainly sponsoring those events was seen to be positive in that regard," Mr. Hodge said.
.
Mr. Hodge was made a commander of the British Empire, a government-awarded honor in January 2001.
.
Labour party officials said Enron had bought tickets to dinners organized by the party and had helped sponsor a 1998 party congress by footing the $21,000 bill for drinks.
.
Among other payments, the company also spent as much as $11,000 to attend a dinner in 1997. But Labour denied that Enron had made straight cash donations.
.
The Conservative vice chairman, Tim Collins, said that there had been "significant donations" by Enron that had led to "very interesting coincidences" in policy shifts.
.
But David Triesman, the Labour Party general secretary, said, "The idea that a government switches its policy on energy a week after having a gala dinner is really among the more absurd claims I've heard in my political life."
.
It was Mr. Triesman who confirmed that Labour had, however, received the equivalent of $51,000 from Enron in sponsorship of events.
.
The dispute was Page One news in British newspapers Tuesday.
.
"The Enron saga is threatening to stain Labour," the pro-Labour Guardian newspaper said.
.
"Having hammered the Conservatives over sleaze before 1997, Labour should not be surprised to be spattered when the mud starts flying," it said in an editorial.
.
"But given the paucity of the allegations and that its potential investigating body is the Labour-dominated parliamentary Public Administration Committee, none of the dirt is likely to stick," the Guardian said.
.
"The same cannot be said of the Bush White House. What Enron did at Westminster was utterly dwarfed by its actions in Washington."
.
The Enron collapse has become a major story in broadsheet British newspapers and on television news shows. It has been depicted as, potentially, the Bush administration's equivalent of Watergate in the Nixon era or President Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
.
To that extent, it has revived the perceptions, suspended after Sept. 11, that the Bush administration is extraordinarily close to the energy business.
.
Mr. Blair's office said that successive ministers, including former Trade Secretaries Peter Mandelson and Stephen Byers and Industry Ministers John Battle and Helen Liddell had met with Enron representatives.
.
But the prime minister had never met Enron executives, his office said.
.
Mr. Byers was present at the formal opening of Enron Europe's offices in London in February 2001.
.
"Yes, Enron representatives have met Government ministers from the Department of Trade and Industry over the course of the years since the government came to power," a spokesman said. "They are not alone in that and at some meetings they were there with representatives of other companies."
.
Trade secretaries play a vital regulatory role in determining whether deals are submitted for antitrust scrutiny.
.
Opposition politicians from both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, the third party in the British Parliament, have voiced concerns that Enron's purchase in 1998 of the utility Wessex Water had not been referred to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission.
.
They have also sought to link Enron's contributions to Labour with a decision in November 2000 to lift a ban on the construction of new gas-fired electric power stations.
.
That decision benefited Enron, which was one of six applicants whose plans for gas-fired power stations had been delayed. Enron had been seeking approval for a 1,200-megawatt station off the southern English coast on the Isle of Grain.
.
Matthew Taylor of the Liberal Democrats also said there had been a close relationship between Mr. Blair's party and the accounting firm Arthur Andersen, Enron's U.S. auditor, which is accused of shredding documents to avoid scrutiny.
.
Mr. Taylor said those ties dated to 1992, when Arthur Andersen offered consultants to work, free, on economic policy with Labour.
.
Arthur Andersen had been refused British government contracts since 1982, when it was implicated in the collapse of the Delorean car manufacturing company. Labour ended that ban after it came to power.
.
The company said in a statement that it did "a relatively small amount" of work for the government and had not been "unusually close" to Mr. Blair's party.
 
Shouldn't a better title be:

Food for thought for the Brits worried about Clinton involvement with ENRON.

I see a lot of 1997s, 1998s, 1992s in there ol chap. :(
 
Meanwhile the Conservatives are now wishing they had never tried to make political capital out of it in the first place.

Lord Wakeham, a former Conservative Cabinet minister (Energy Secretary in Margaret Thatcher's government), who was paid £80,000 last year by Enron is flying out to America to answer questions over his role in the collapse.

"Board members who are found to have been negligent could face multimillion-pound compensation claims. Lord Wakeham, a chartered accoutant, served on the all-important audit committee which was supposed to highlight accounting irregularities."

Times (London) 30 Jan 2002

This decision to effectively subpoena Lord Wakeham is now causing an embarrassment for the Conservatives who have been attacking Tony Blair's government for its involvement in the affair.

:)
 
There's just one big gravy train and all our politicians are on it to some degree.
 
UNITED KINGDOM: Enron Took The Influence Show On The Road

Enron "mounted a ferocious lobbying operation" in the UK, hoping to persuade politicians to "drop their restrictions on the construction of gas-fired power stations." Enron "secured six meetings with ministers before they announced the lifting of restrictions in April 2000." Enron made contributions totaling 36,000 pounds to the Labour Party. Conservatives have called for "inquiries into allegations of 'cash for access.'" PM Tony Blair's spokesperson said the PM had "not had any meetings with Enron executives. But Downing Street declined to comment on allegations" that Blair "intervened in 1998 to water down the government's plans for a moratorium on the construction of gas-fired power stations" (Parker/Groom/Peel, Financial Times, 1/29).
 
p_p, buddy.. just change your name to "Political National Inquirer" and get it over with.
 
Just a short post to say...

This thread has been written by my wanabee, who hasn't been around much come to think of it.

If you want to know whether it's him or her posting under my name just check the post total.

I'm the one with the higher number.

:)

Having said that, though, I've always enjoyed my wanabee's posts,

Smashing well written and well constructed English...

:D
 
Last edited:
Enron debacle is...

...trivial!

I'm stunned by the news that we have an "imposter" on the board.

Where is the Mirror when you need it?
 
Re: Enron debacle is...

Closet Desire said:
[BWhere is the Mirror when you need it? [/B]

Which one?

The "Daily" or the one that should be hanging on the wall?

:D
 
Holy shit the joke’s on me. I may finally be getting this British humor your colleagues talk about.

I COULDN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE UNTIL YOU SAID SOMETHING!
 
Back
Top