FIRE - College Free Speech Rankings

[ll74]

Part of the pod I posted earlier, the CEO of FIRE was on the Remnant today. Part of it was the rankings of free speech on college campuses.

I think this is valuable information, so providing in a new thread. Feel free to argue about how you're right and I'm wrong as needed.

https://www.thefire.org/college-free-speech-rankings

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Good to see three ACC schools in the top 5. Harvard at the very bottom…color me shocked.

 

[UltraChad]

Good to see three ACC schools in the top 5. Harvard at the very bottom…color me shocked.

Yea, it's almost like progressive leftoid (D)ipshits aren't very pro-free speech. Who could have imagined that!!!

 

[ll74]

Good to see three ACC schools in the top 5. Harvard at the very bottom…color me shocked.

I didn't post this for your to cheer your team.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

He went to Harvard…

I could have sworn that bit was done by John Lovitz on SNL…

 

[ll74]

Yea, it's almost like progressive leftoid (D)ipshits aren't very pro-free speech. Who could have imagined that!!!

Shocker you'd weigh in on this.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

I didn't post this for your to cheer your team.

Didn’t have your coffee yet? I’m not cheering a team…just stated a fact. Care to expound on why Haaaaaavaaaad is dead last? You know, the school that’s held in such high esteem by the left?

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

I didn’t read the whole report, just the top and bottom. What the betting line all the noted Liberal standard bearers are near the bottom?

 

[ll74]

Didn’t have your coffee yet? I’m not cheering a team…just stated a fact. Care to expound on why Haaaaaavaaaad is dead last? You know, the school that’s held in such high esteem by the left?

My college is better than your college because things.

Yes, of course...not cheering your horse here.

I don't need to explain or cheer/jeer colleges here...it's data.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

So you make a post about how colleges rank in free speech but don’t want to debate about where said schools rank…got it.

I’m not sure why I even try…

 

[ll74]

So you make a post about how colleges rank in free speech but don’t want to debate about where said schools rank…got it.

I’m not sure why I even try…

Lol. Yes, I posted information. Sorry about that. I know you need to tell me why your horse is better in that information.

 

[CambridgeBi]

This is shocking:

Sadly UK universities aren't really any better.

 

[UltraChad]

Shocker you'd weigh in on this.

A chance to point out just how illiberal the Democrats are?? Like a fly to shit.

My college is better than your college because things.

Yes, of course...not cheering your horse here.

I don't need to explain or cheer/jeer colleges here...it's data.

Not because things, because it's not an echo chamber for leftist mental illness and delusions.

Yes it's data that shows how illiberal the left really is.

This is shocking:

Sadly UK universities aren't really any better.

Free speech is FASCIST!!!

Brought to you by the race/ethno- socialist who hate Jews, are queers protesting for Palestine and unironically call others Nazis.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I clicked your link, but I'm not about to sign up for a mailing list as a prerequisite to read the rankings.
Could you possibly copy/paste the top 10?
Thankee.

 

[ll74]

A chance to point out just how illiberal the Democrats are?? Like a fly to shit.

Generalizing is your gig

Not because things, because it's not an echo chamber for leftist mental illness and delusions.

Generalizing is your gig

Yes it's data that shows how illiberal the left really is.

Generalizing is your gig

Free speech is FASCIST!!!

Wtf?

Brought to you by the race/ethno- socialist who hate Jews, are queers protesting for Palestine and unironically call others Nazis.

Generalizing is your gig

 

[UltraChad]

Generalizing is your gig


Generalizing is your gig


Generalizing is your gig

The world runs on generalizations.

NAXALT is fucking weak, pathetic, loser argumentation.

Wtf?

I'm clowning you and the other free speech loathing (D)'s.

Generalizing is your gig

So? I'm not wrong.

 

[ll74]

The world runs on generalizations.

You do.

NAXALT is fucking weak, pathetic, loser argumentation.

Lol

I'm clowning you and the other free speech loathing (D)'s.

I support free speech.

So? I'm not wrong.

You generally are.

 

[UltraChad]

You do.

So do most people...and thus the world.

Lol

It is what it is.

I support free speech.

How ULTRA-MAGA of you........amazing how MAGA you claim to be while being hyper defensive of and shilling for communist.

You generally are.

Not usually, pretty rare in fact. NAXALT doesn't make me wrong, it makes your points weak as fuck.

 

[ll74]

So do most people...and thus the world.

People using generalizations to understand complex subjects doesn't actually make generalizations good or even acceptable. That's not how it works.

How ULTRA-MAGA of you........amazing how MAGA you claim to be while being hyper defensive of and shilling for communist.

You don't seem to understand what MAGA is.
But regardless, I support free speech.

Not usually, pretty rare in fact. NAXALT doesn't make me wrong, it makes your points weak as fuck.

I never said that something you referred to made.you wrong.

 

[UltraChad]

People using generalizations to understand complex subjects doesn't actually make generalizations good or even acceptable. That's not how it works.

No the end results that actually matter is what makes them acceptable.

The nuanced bullshit is just self delusion in an attempt to polish up whatever turd they got behind.

You don't seem to understand what MAGA is.

I'm sure you and the other MSNBC consumers think you know.

But regardless, I support free speech.

Far reich wing fascist!!!

I never said that something you referred to made.you wrong.

So then you understand the generalizations are generally correct.

Or do you just not know what naxalt is??

 

[ll74]

No the end results that actually matter is what makes them acceptable.

Generalizations are acceptable for laymen. For actual political discussions they are not. You use them too much.

The nuanced bullshit is just self delusion in an attempt to polish up whatever turd they got behind.

You just don't like specifics because it requires more thought on your part

Democrats bad
Republicans good.

*Grunt noise*

I'm sure you and the other MSNBC consumers think you know.

No idea what this means.
I'm not discussing MAGA in the same context you are

Far reich wing fascist!!!

I support free speech.

So then you understand the generalizations are generally correct.

They can be. Most of the time in discussions on politics, they are not

Or do you just not know what naxalt is??

I know what it is. I am commenting on your opinions....not on naxalt. You have conversations with ideas of people...I focus on what the people I'm talking to are saying.

If you're arguing with who you generalize about, you're not actually arguing with the person

 

[ll74]

No the end results that actually matter is what makes them acceptable.

The nuanced bullshit is just self delusion in an attempt to polish up whatever turd they got behind.



I'm sure you and the other MSNBC consumers think you know.



Far reich wing fascist!!!



So then you understand the generalizations are generally correct.

Or do you just not know what naxalt is??

I'm just going to add some context here - generalizing about politics concepts is fine. I do that about the base MAGA supporters. But I don't assume that anyone here fits the mold of that generalization.

And that is your issue. You go the other way.....you put everyone here in the generalization mold. Nobody here fits the MAGA generalization that I have, and even those who do fit the mold to me, are not the same. I do not speak to anyone here with generalizations,...I don't take what they say to fit that mold ...I think that is horrible for people to do.

 

[UltraChad]

Generalizations are acceptable for laymen. For actual political discussions they are not. You use them too much.

You just don't like specifics because it requires more thought on your part

I'm fine with specifics, they are how I make lefties squirm.

Generalizations however are usually more than sufficient if they are far left enough.

Democrats bad
Republicans good.

*Grunt noise*

Close...but this is ascription.

Actual opinon is Democrats EVIL, Republicans spineless but good at giving angry speeches.

No idea what this means.

It's ok.

They can be. Most of the time in discussions on politics, they are not

They usually are.

I know what it is. I am commenting on your opinions....not on naxalt.

Sure bro...whatever you say

I focus on what the people I'm talking to are saying.

LMFAO!!! You seem to just ramble random bullshit half the time and vague obfuscations the other half.

It's rare you actually seem to respond to anything anyone is actually saying.

 

[ll74]

I'm fine with specifics, they are how I make lefties squirm.

Generalizations however are usually more than sufficient if they are far left enough.


Close...but this is ascription.

Actual opinon is Democrats EVIL, Republicans spineless but good at giving angry speeches.



It's ok.


They usually are.



Sure bro...whatever you say



LMFAO!!! You seem to just ramble random bullshit half the time and vague obfuscations the other half.

It's rare you actually seem to respond to anything anyone is actually saying.

You continue to have an argument with who you generalize me to be.

Ill leave you to that.

 

[Rightguide]

Part of the pod I posted earlier, the CEO of FIRE was on the Remnant today. Part of it was the rankings of free speech on college campuses.

I think this is valuable information, so providing in a new thread. Feel free to argue about how you're right and I'm wrong as needed.

https://www.thefire.org/college-free-speech-rankings

Look where leftist leadership gets you.