Finally, Justice For Flynn

[Rightguide]

It's about time...


Appeals court orders judge to dismiss Flynn charges
By Harper Neidig - 06/24/20 10:11 AM EDT

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ordered a judge to grant the Department of Justice's (DOJ) unusual move to drop charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

A three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals approved Flynn's petition to intervene in the case after a district court judge had tapped an outside counsel to argue against the DOJ's move.

The panel ruled 2-1, with two Republican-appointed judges carrying the majority, that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan overstepped his authority in second-guessing the prosecutors' decision.
ADVERTISEMENT

"In this case, the district court’s actions will result in specific harms to the exercise of the Executive Branch’s exclusive prosecutorial power," Judge Neomi Rao, who was appointed to the circuit court by President Trump, wrote in the majority opinion.

https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...s-court-orders-judge-to-dismiss-flynn-charges

 

[Mal_Huevo]

Nice copy and paste, boomer.

 

[Wrong Element]

"In this case, the district court’s actions will result in specific harms to the exercise of the Executive Branch’s exclusive prosecutorial power," Judge Neomi Rao, who was appointed to the circuit court by President Trump, wrote in the majority opinion.

Closed circle of corruption.

Does the hack Rao address Flynn's guilty plea anywhere in her opinion, or is that "fake news?"

 

[Rightguide]

Closed circle of corruption.

Does the hack Rao address Flynn's guilty plea anywhere in her opinion, or is that "fake news?"

The existing case law was presented in Flynn's motion, and addressed here ad nauseam. The court ruled on the law which had nothing to do with Flynn's coerced plea.

 

[Rightguide]

Closed circle of corruption.

Does the hack Rao address Flynn's guilty plea anywhere in her opinion, or is that "fake news?"

It isn't as if you weren't told by myself, Harpy, and others that this was going to happen. Was it because we are clairvoyant, no. It was because we understood the law and you didn't.

 

[Conager]

At least AlwaysElementallyWrong had the courage to blunder in with his rehash of "But he Pled GUILTY!" as if that matters once withdrawn, especially for cause.

Most will hide from their pontificating about how Sullivan was anything but batshit crazy and their fantasies that Sullivan could act as Judge, investigator, and prosecutor and convict Flynn, much less all the other people they imagined this non-existent avenue to get anyone associated with Trump ensnared.

They were talking of Barr being sanctioned, disbarred, and jailed for reversing a clear-cut case of prosecutorial misconduct.

 

[Rightguide]

At least AlwaysElementallyWrong had the courage to blunder in with his rehash of "But he Pled GUILTY!" as if that matters once withdrawn, especially for cause.

Most will hide from their pontificating about how Sullivan was anything but batshit crazy and their fantasies that Sullivan could act as Judge, investigator, and prosecutor and convict Flynn, much less all 5he other people they imagined this non-existent avenue to get anyone associated with Trump ensnared.

They were talking of Barr being sanctioned, disbarred, jailed for reversing a clear-cut case of prosecutorial misconduct.

Flynn's motion before the Appeals Court was a brutal take down of Judge Sullivan and his idiotic amicus curiae, Judge Gleeson.

 

[renard_ruse]

The panel ruled 2-1, with two Republican-appointed judges carrying the majority, that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet...

So in other words if it had been a Democrat majority they would have rubber stamped the politically motivated persecution of an opponent of the Party.

Once Democrats become undefeatable due to the orchestrated demographic change, they have every intention of imprisoning or killing anyone they consider an opponent (or in Flynn's case a traitor to the Party).

Then even after the opponent is dead, his or her memory will continue to be attacked and demonized and any legacy or positive contribution to society will be erased or desecrated. They are STILL persecuting poor Mrs. Schott to this day for example.

They are literally sick, like the mobs that kick and burn statues after they have torn them down. And the majority of brainwashed sheep slumber on occasionally snoring their tacit approval of the whole grotesque circus.

To reiterate, they want anyone who disagrees with them, particularly anyone who dares to publicly challenge them censored, depersoned, blacklisted, imprisoned, tortured, killed, then finally their memory desecrated and their body mutilated all the while calling themselves "virtuous" and "seekers of justice."

To paraphrase an infamous cable TV commentator, "this is our country now."

 

[Conager]

Flynn's motion before the Appeals Court was a brutal take down of Judge Sullivan and his idiotic amicus curiae, Judge Gleeson.

Gleeson sounded like any run-of-the-mill TDS sufferer here. Spouting the same breathless theories and Sullivan got caught up in the nonsense. The apparent enmity towards Flynn by Sullivan, when Flynn who has far as anything I have read did nothing to provoke that was odd.

Early on everyone had high hopes for Sullivan because he was the very judge who didn't like the prosecutorial misconduct in some other cases.

He has be cloud his reputation which was actually pretty good before this. Maybe he's slipping into Joe Bidenville. Never go full Joe Biden.

 

[Rightguide]

So in other words if it had been a Democrat majority they would have rubber stamped the politically motivated persecution of an opponent of the Party.

There are 17 judges on the full court, even if we were to see an en banc decision, I'd say the result would be the same as a big part of Flynn's defense is the Appeals Court own case law.

 

[Conager]

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/06/24/861150/

Obama/Bidengate.

This is what they knew, and when they knew it on Flynn.

Next, did Mueller have these notes from Peter Strozyk?

If so, when did he have them and does this have something to do with searching his texts?

If not, why not?

 

[Rightguide]

Gleeson sounded like any run-of-the-mill TDS sufferer here. Spouting the same breathless theories and Sullivan got caught up in the nonsense. The apparent enmity towards Flynn by Sullivan, when Flynn who has far as anything I have read did nothing to provoke that was odd.

Early on everyone had high hopes for Sullivan because he was the very judge who didn't like the prosecutorial misconduct in some other cases.

He has be cloud his reputation which was actually pretty good before this. Maybe he's slipping into Joe Bidenville. Never go full Joe Biden.

He did kick the crap out of the DOJ in the Ted Sevens case. Robert Barnes, of Barnes Law, a top litigator in the federal court system, has some harsh criticism of Sullivan and his legal acumen in past cases. He can be found discussing Sullivan with Viva Frei on youtube here in regard to the Flynn case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akY4ns-1qu4

 

[Rightguide]

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/06/24/861150/

Obama/Bidengate.

This is what they knew, and when they knew it on Flynn.

Next, did Mueller have these notes from Peter Strozyk?

If so, when did he have them and does this have something to do with searching his texts?

If not, why not?

It's my understanding that Mueller is a subject of Durham's investigation. He knew the day he took the job there was no case for Russian Collusion.

 

[Rightguide]

These are devastating revelations that up until now have been sealed under a protective order of the court. They reveal that on Jan.4, 2017, the date the FBI was to close the case against Flynn, Obama ordered the hit on Flynn to continue:


BREAKING: Newly Released Strzok Notes Implicate Obama and Biden DIRECTLY Ordering Sham Flynn Investigation
By Cristina Laila
Published June 24, 2020 at 10:30am

Strzok also noted that Obama DIRECTLY ordered an investigation into Flynn, saying “Have the right people on the case.”

Then-FBI Director James Comey said the calls between Flynn and Kislyak “appear legit” but they went ahead with the hit job against Flynn.

“Strzok’s notes believed to be of January 4, 2017, reveal that former President Obama, James Comey, Sally Yates, Joe Biden and apparently Susan Rice discussed the transcripts of Flynn’s calls and how to proceed against him.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...n-directly-ordering-sham-flynn-investigation/

 

[schism666]

These are devastating revelations that up until now have been sealed under a protective order of the court. They reveal that on Jan.4, 2017, the date the FBI was to close the case against Flynn, Obama ordered the hit on Flynn to continue:


BREAKING: Newly Released Strzok Notes Implicate Obama and Biden DIRECTLY Ordering Sham Flynn Investigation
By Cristina Laila
Published June 24, 2020 at 10:30am

Strzok also noted that Obama DIRECTLY ordered an investigation into Flynn, saying “Have the right people on the case.”

Then-FBI Director James Comey said the calls between Flynn and Kislyak “appear legit” but they went ahead with the hit job against Flynn.

“Strzok’s notes believed to be of January 4, 2017, reveal that former President Obama, James Comey, Sally Yates, Joe Biden and apparently Susan Rice discussed the transcripts of Flynn’s calls and how to proceed against him.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...n-directly-ordering-sham-flynn-investigation/

what's the difference in what was actually written and what you took liberties with? kind of a pattern with you.

 

[Rightguide]

what's the difference in what was actually written and what you took liberties with? kind of a pattern with you.

We were right, Obama did order the hit on Flynn.

"The Justice Department released Peter Strzok notes from 1/4/2017 regarding the Flynn-Kislyak calls."

 

[schism666]

We were right, Obama did order the hit on Flynn.

"we?" when and who said that obama "ordered the hit?" i mean here on lit.

 

[Rightguide]

"we?" when and who said that obama "ordered the hit?" i mean here on lit.

Myself and others said the decision most likely went all the way to the top, meaning the "top," Obama.

 

[Conager]

Peter Strozyk's notes says that.

Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

 

[schism666]

"we?" when and who said that obama "ordered the hit?" i mean here on lit.

Peter Strozyk's notes says that.

Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

sit the fuck down, q. you're trolling gets weaker by the hour, you classless dumb shit.

Myself and others said the decision most likely went all the way to the top, meaning the "top," Obama.

sure ya did.

 

[Conager]

Keep classy!

 

[Rightguide]

sit the fuck down, q. you're trolling gets weaker by the hour, you classless dumb shit.



sure ya did.

Search it, it's there several times.

 

[Rightguide]

Peter Strozyk's notes says that.

Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

He has trouble reading anything that points to his hero, Obama, being exposed as a crime wave orchestrating snake.

 

[schism666]

Keep classy!

always, fuckwad! always.

Search it, it's there several times.

nah, we'll just keep calling you a liar until you provide some evidence to back up your bullshit.

He has trouble reading anything that points to his hero, Obama, being exposed as a crime wave orchestrating snake.

obama isn't my hero like trump is actually yours. crimewave? how many of trump's boys are indicted or in jail?

 

[Conager]

Well, as of today?

One less.