fieryjen, empty your Box!

Funny....I always thought that a full box was a good box. But then, I'm admittedly not surfing the top of the bell curve. ;)
 
Y'know, I don't even hang with you people, but this thread title is just too enticing for me to avoid comment. Unfortunately, I am no box unfiller. Quite the opposite, unfortunately. Guy thing, I suppose.

My best wishes to you all, though, in your box emptying efforts. :rolleyes:
 
You are always welcome here. :kiss:

And personally, I prefer to be filled.

Call that a girl thing.

;)
OK: Girl thing.

Odd. In saying that, I don't feel all that much better. There's something—some physical thing—that seems to be missing. Hmmm.

Oh, of course! It's μ! The coefficient of friction, an empirical property of the contacting materials resisting relative lateral motion!

Friction is not a fundamental force, as it is derived from electromagnetic force between charged particles, including electrons, protons, atoms, and molecules, and so cannot be calculated from first principles, but instead must be found empirically. When contacting surfaces move relative to each other, the friction between the two surfaces converts kinetic energy into thermal energy, or heat. Contrary to earlier explanations, kinetic friction is now understood not to be caused not by surface roughness but by chemical bonding between the surfaces. Surface roughness and contact area, however, do affect kinetic friction for micro- and nano-scale objects where surface area forces dominate inertial forces.

Well, & other suchness.

Idle, irrelevant comments, is all.

Sorry.

Is that box free yet? :cool:
 
Ah, now.

Wiki is never a good source for detailed information.

(I stopped checking Wiki for things when one of my daughter's friends added a classmate to the "Ugly" topic. It remained there for nearly a day.)

But if we're going to talk friction, I'd rather go with lubricated friction. Layer of liquid, two solid surfaces moving against each other - yum.

That's the closest I can think of to really good sex.

;)
Oh, m'dear, seduction (or flirtation, or simple response) is never about detail. It's all about semantic fog. Vaguely lubricious words that retain plausible deniability while promising some kind of smokily evanescent love. Or something like that.

Some rather commitment-free thing, actually. Well, at least for guys.

We could argue the accuracy of Wikipedia's "detailed information" over a bottle of Sonoma Cutrer, though I suspect your husband and my wife might object.

Or they might drink all the wine, in which case I would object.

Whatever. Nice fingernails. ;)

And good luck on emptying that box. :cool:
 
:eek::eek::eek:

I wasn't even aware this thread existed!





And now I feel all self-conscious about my box having been full. That's just mean.

It's no longer full, for the moment, anyway. I can't guarantee it will remain this empty for long. It usually doesn't.




:eek:
 
:eek::eek::eek:

I wasn't even aware this thread existed!





And now I feel all self-conscious about my box having been full. That's just mean.

It's no longer full, for the moment, anyway. I can't guarantee it will remain this empty for long. It usually doesn't.




:eek:

This is a topic that just can't be resisted :D

The image will be with me for years :D

I'm still leary of chipping a tooth on that chain :eek:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top