Feminist admits that (mildly) misogynistic behavior makes a man more attractive.

[LJ_Reloaded]

Yet she continues to put 100% of the blame on men for being the kind of males that women are attracted to. Like most women she fails to comprehend that if she actually walked that feminist big talk, "oafish" men like this would fail to get laid and then fail to reproduce, and men like Donald Trump would not have three wives and a ton of kids, perpetuating the misogyny problem.

Nope, the entire fault is men. Not, of course, the women who gravitate to the worst of men.

Go figure.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...nly-men/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2d4d6b4386a5

Within minutes of meeting my Bumble date at a bike race, he demanded that I take off my sunglasses so he could see my eyes. I obliged. In the two hours we were together, he proceeded to put his hand firmly on my butt, pretending to usher me through a crowd. He also did not ask before reaching over to rub my shoulders, as though he had a right to touch my body.

As a feminist writer, I understand that these behaviors denote male entitlement and indicate that he might not respect women. And yet, I was turned on. I have always been attracted to dominant men.

I have intermittently been dating online for over two years, and I have dated all kinds of men: those in white-collar jobs and blue-collar ones; white men; dark men; young men; older men; tall men; short men; men who lie about their relationship status. But what hasn’t wavered, is that, as a “traditionally feminine” woman, I end up being attracted to the men who come off as “traditionally masculine.”

From what I’ve glimpsed in dating these 30- to 45-year-old men, most of them seemed to be just as confused as I am. They try to be progressive when it comes to gender roles but don’t have a clear blueprint of how to proceed.

 

[beew]

yeah, I read the article and she seems to confuse several things.
For example:

She sees guys who offer to give advice or to help with DIY to women that they like as patronizing or a bit misogynistic, when those are about something else.

And while she's right that there's nothing dated about being attracted to confident men,
she's ok with a man who grabs her ass on their first blind date... wtf?

 

[DMBFFF]

Keep in mind that the word "misogynistic" nor its variants are used.

Yet she continues to put 100% of the blame on men for being the kind of males that women are attracted to.

I think she blames patriarchy.

Like most women she fails to comprehend that if she actually walked that feminist big talk, "oafish" men like this would fail to get laid and then fail to reproduce, and men like Donald Trump would not have three wives and a ton of kids, perpetuating the misogyny problem.

They did it for da money. Also a lot of oafish men rape.

yeah, I read the article and she seems to confuse several things.
For example:

She sees guys who offer to give advice or to help with DIY to women that they like as patronizing or a bit misogynistic, when those are about something else.

And while she's right that there's nothing dated about being attracted to confident men,
she's ok with a man who grabs her ass on their first blind date... wtf?

Last paragraph:

I can say that the guy from the bike race, who showed up puffed and ready to show off, ended up being a sensitive man, a doting and caring father to two girls. Had I dismissed his hand on my butt as entitlement, I might not have seen this bigger picture. He still mansplains more than any guy I’ve ever met. But after a few months of knowing him, I am certain he doesn’t underestimate my intelligence.

 

[richard_daily]

LT fails to understand the concept of "consent". This is not surprising, given that he's never touched a woman since his wife left him for his mental health issues. Will he seek out vengeance at waffle house?

I doubt he'd have the arm length given his short stature.

 

[beew]

I can say that the guy from the bike race, who showed up puffed and ready to show off, ended up being a sensitive man, a doting and caring father to two girls. Had I dismissed his hand on my butt as entitlement, I might not have seen this bigger picture. He still mansplains more than any guy I’ve ever met.

But after a few months of knowing him, I am certain he doesn’t underestimate my intelligence. :

Being a caring parent of two daughters (as he portrays himself to be) doesn't automatically make him Mr. Sensitive or Mr. Feminist.
His true colors will show up in time.

He's probably very good looking and good in bed.
As BotanyBoy would say, she would have cried bloody murder if an ugly guy grabbed her ass on their first blind date.

 

[richard_daily]

Being a caring parent of two daughters (as he portrays himself to be) doesn't automatically make him Mr. Sensitive or Mr. Feminist.
His true colors will show up in time.

He's probably very good looking and good in bed.
As BotanyBoy would say, she would have cried bloody murder if an ugly guy grabbed her ass on their first blind date.

Let's not bring LT into this.

 

[beew]

Let's not bring LT into this.

The thread and the story are so funny!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

LT fails to understand the concept of "consent". This is not surprising, given that he's never touched a woman since his wife left him for his mental health issues. Will he seek out vengeance at waffle house?

I doubt he'd have the arm length given his short stature.

Wow, great make believe storytelling. If you applied these skills around a real life woman you

er

wait, no wonder you've never been laid. Nevermind.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Keep in mind that the word "misogynistic" nor its variants are used.




I think she blames patriarchy.


They did it for da money. Also a lot of oafish men rape.




Last paragraph:

Feminists always blame patriarchy. That's their number one problem, feminists say women can do no wrong, just blame it all on men. That's why you never hear about women raping women, which happens in a THIRD of lesbian relationships.

 

[DMBFFF]

Feminists always blame patriarchy. That's their number one problem, feminists say women can do no wrong, just blame it all on men. That's why you never hear about women raping women, which happens in a THIRD of lesbian relationships.

1. Feminists, ostensibly, at least, want liberation for women from sexist oppression.
Patriarchy is based on sexist oppression.
Ergo, one would kind of expect feminists to oppose and blame patriarchy.

2. Your last two comments are over-generalizations. Some truth in such, but not totally.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Feminists always blame patriarchy. That's their number one problem, feminists say women can do no wrong, just blame it all on men.

Just like SJW's always blame white people and all their whiteness for their woes.

Just like socialist always blame the top 50% for all their problems.

Feminism is identity politics and leftism....your favorite!!

 

[BotanyBoy]

1. Feminists, ostensibly, at least, want liberation for women from sexist oppression.
Patriarchy is based on sexist oppression.
Ergo, one would kind of expect feminists to oppose and blame patriarchy.

That being the key word, reality is liberation was some time ago and it's turned into a she-rah man haters club.

They are the thing they supposedly oppose....a bunch of sexist bigots.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

1. Feminists, ostensibly, at least, want liberation for women from sexist oppression.
Patriarchy is based on sexist oppression.
Ergo, one would kind of expect feminists to oppose and blame patriarchy.

2. Your last two comments are over-generalizations. Some truth in such, but not totally.

1. Exactly - they believe women cannot be sexist and will not tolerate any talk of women doing bad things to men and getting away with it. That is why you have women on television celebrating the unprovoked castration of men, THRONGS of women audience laughing and cheering, and there was zero condemnation from feminists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUna51rI_eQ

When women abuse men you know how women react, they snicker and think he had it coming. This was even shown to be true.

http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=2741047&page=1

Verbal and physical abuse of men by women might be an acknowledged problem, but will people try to stop it when "Primetime"'s hidden cameras are rolling?

One after another, passersby witnessed the abusive scene… and kept right on going.

Mathilda was one of those bystanders. She says she didn't think the man was in any physical danger, and could probably take care of himself. "I didn't immediately think to protect the man at all," she said. "It didn't look like any harm was being done."

The reaction of another woman, Lynda, was stunning. As our actress continued to heap abuse on her make-believe boyfriend, she walked by the scene and pumped her fist in a show of sisterly solidarity.

"Good for you. You Go, Girl!" is how Lynda recalls her reaction.

Feminism by nature screams about male privilege while denying that female privilege exists outside of the context of patriarchy. Women have always gotten away with certain behavior that men cannot, even before civilization and Patriarchy ever existed. And solely because of feminism, they always will.

 

[DMBFFF]

That being the key word, reality is liberation was some time ago and it's turned into a she-rah man haters club.

They are the thing they supposedly oppose....a bunch of sexist bigots.

Hmmm.

Let's say the OECD member countries—i.e. the developed or First World—or much of it—have a collective population exceeding 1 billion.

Let's say that half were women and as few as 1% were feminists—self-identified at least.

That'd be over 5 million people.

In my view, that allows for some diversity.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Just like SJW's always blame white people and all their whiteness for their woes.

Just like socialist always blame the top 50% for all their problems.

Feminism is identity politics and leftism....your favorite!!

LOL white identity politics is just as prevalent and even more evil than leftist identity politcs. That's why you have white people gunning down people of color now like it's Nazi Germany all over again.

But hey, when people of color get sick of dying like this and exact some epic payback, I'm sure you will whine like a little bitch.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Hmmm.

Let's say the OECD member countries—i.e. the developed or First World—or much of it—have a collective population exceeding 1 billion.

Let's say that half were women and as few as 1% were feminists—self-identified at least.

That'd be over 5 million people.

In my view, that allows for some diversity.

Last poll in America showed about 18 percent of people called themselves feminists. That is a steep decline from feminism's heyday.

One of the big fuckups of the Men's Rights movement is hitching its cart to the MAGA horse. The MAGA aka WHITE MALE IDENTITY POLITICS epidemic (and, of course, the Harvey Weinstein Effect) is causing feminism to have a major brand revival. I'm sure the number of people who call themselves feminists will have jumped to over 25 percent by now.

 

[DMBFFF]

Yeah, I saw that video.

Right now my computer is kind of slow.

Yeah, I wasn't impressed, but I'd hardly describe Osbourne as a feminist (though I could be wrong).

Wasn't there a dissenter at the table?

and what was the reason for the maiming—he cheated on her?

Don't these idiots know one doesn't need a dick to fuck a woman, or if the guy was truly a psycho, he could still do some bad stuff to them, again, without a dick.

Buncha dumb fucks.

Still, would Gloria Steinem approve? Germaine Greer? Naomi Wolfe?

They might go easy on the criminal, but that's somewhat general of their view of all criminals.

I heard Angela Davis opposes prisons—herself having some field experience in what she speaks of. I heard or read she also opposed the Million Man March because it went against her Communist beliefs.

Again, some diversity.


For the record, I don't consider myself one of these "male feminists" such as my prime minister. Not feminist, not anti-feminist, more, if you will, "afeminist," though with some sympathies.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Hmmm.

Let's say the OECD member countries—i.e. the developed or First World—or much of it—have a collective population exceeding 1 billion.

Let's say that half were women and as few as 1% were feminists—self-identified at least.

That'd be over 5 million people.

In my view, that allows for some diversity.

Oh there is diversity.....but very little of it.

Most women who look at the first world and say "Shit...things are pretty good, what about places where women are living in the fuckin' dark ages??" get called racist xenophobes and run out of the feminist camp as alt-right bigots.

LOL white identity politics is just as prevalent and even more evil than leftist identity politcs.

Not today and not more evil.

You're just so filled with hate you can't see they are the exact same shit.

That's why you have white people gunning down people of color now like it's Nazi Germany all over again.

Not anything close to like Nazi Germany, you need to read a history book.

But hey, when people of color get sick of dying like this and exact some epic payback, I'm sure you will whine like a little bitch.

Nah...they never will do it, they don't have it in them.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Not today and not more evil.

You're just so filled with hate you can't see they are the exact same shit.

FACT - leftists don't kill.
FACT - Conservatives have killed tons of people. Far right attacks happen 300 times a year.

Name one leftist mass killing in America in the last 10 years. For each one I will name three right wing mass killings. GO!

Yeah, I thought so, you can't come up with shit, now can you?

Yeah, I saw that video.

Right now my computer is kind of slow.

Yeah, I wasn't impressed, but I'd hardly describe Osbourne as a feminist (though I could be wrong).

It's not about her being a feminist. It's about her being a woman, and about the crowd of women audience that cheered her, and it's about the feminists who never protested this shit being on television.

Wasn't there a dissenter at the table?

Uh, where?

and what was the reason for the maiming—he cheated on her?

You call that a legitimate reason? What would womankind say if a man did this to a wife who cheated on him? What would women say if men on TV cheered him and the male audience repeatedly applauded?

Feminists cannot answer those questions. No feminist can answer them.

Don't these idiots know one doesn't need a dick to fuck a woman, or if the guy was truly a psycho, he could still do some bad stuff to them, again, without a dick.

Women rape women all the time. Rape is reported in a third of all lesbian relationships.

Still, would Gloria Steinem approve? Germaine Greer? Naomi Wolfe?

They might go easy on the criminal, but that's somewhat general of their view of all criminals.

No, they would never go easy on male criminals like they would female criminals. Feminists are calling for abolishing prisons for women - not men.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ns-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-13666066

https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...-in-jail-for-anything/?utm_term=.7372ca1ad477

I heard Angela Davis opposes prisons—herself having some field experience in what she speaks of. I heard or read she also opposed the Million Man March because it went against her Communist beliefs.

Again, some diversity.


For the record, I don't consider myself one of these "male feminists" such as my prime minister. Not feminist, not anti-feminist, more, if you will, "afeminist," though with some sympathies.

I won't identify with anti-feminists because of Trump supporters, people like Roosh V and Return of Kings, traditional Conservatives, and the other REAL misogynists who are just as bad as the radical feminists. Plus black feminists tend to be nicer and more defensive of men (black men in particular) than white feminists.

After the men's rights movement threw its lot behind MAGA, I stopped running with them. I call myself an egalitarian now.

 

[BotanyBoy]

FACT - leftists don't kill.

You're already wrong ....go back and try again.

 

[richard_daily]

Wow, great make believe storytelling. If you applied these skills around a real life woman you

er

wait, no wonder you've never been laid. Nevermind.

Uh huh:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=599561

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You're already wrong ....go back and try again.

But since you have no examples, I am right, you lost this fight, and you've jumped the shark. Game over, try again.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Uh huh:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=599561

Yup, I killed that dog to protect my wife and baby, and no, you have already admitted you have no case against me on that except that you don't like me. You admitted you have nothing else at all.

You shoulda checked yourself before you rekt yourself.

 

[richard_daily]

Yup, I killed that dog to protect my wife and baby, and no, you have already admitted you have no case against me on that except that you don't like me. You admitted you have nothing else at all.

You shoulda checked yourself before you rekt yourself.

You didn't kill a dog, and you don't have a wife.

You're in a fantasy world. You're an idiot.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You didn't kill a dog, and you don't have a wife.

You're in a fantasy world. You're an idiot.

Yup, I killed that dog to protect my wife and baby, and no, you have already admitted you have no case against me on that except that you don't like me. You admitted you have nothing else at all.

And since I am right and you are wrong I will harass you with this response endlessly until you realize you're defeated and go away. And you know I always outlast you because you're a fucking pussy.

BTW how's that AR-51 you claim to own? Does it compensate sufficiently for your total lack of a dick?