Feminism will be held accountable for shit like this.

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://wgntv.com/2016/03/24/man-pro...-to-pay-child-support-for-another-mans-child/

Man protests law requiring him to pay child support for another man’s child

Joe Vandusen thought it was a joke when he received a certified letter from the Iowa Department of Human Resources last month at his home in Davenport, according to WQAD.

"I opened it up and it was child support, for a kid that is not even mine," he said.

The child was recently born to his long estranged wife, and there's no way it's his, he said.

"We've had no contact whatsoever in 16 or 17 years, and the child just turned one year old," Vandusen said.

But by law, Joe is still legally responsible and the state and its Child Support Recovery Unit, are telling him, he had better pay up.

 

[nerfhearder]

That's not feminism, it's a dumb guy who never got a divorce.

 

[Cmdr_L]

That's not feminism, it's a dumb guy who never got a divorce.

And the divorce and child-support laws are the way they are because of feminists. Don't be intellectually dishonest.

 

[nerfhearder]

And the divorce and child-support laws are the way they are because of feminists. Don't be intellectually dishonest.

No they aren't.

 

[phrodeau]

Who is being held accountable for this guy?
http://www.mypokecard.com/en/Gallery/my/galery/5xg3mRKDb28l.jpg

 

[richard_daily]

And the divorce and child-support laws are the way they are because of feminists. Don't be intellectually dishonest.

No they aren't. If you believe that, you're as dumb as LT.

 

[Cmdr_L]

No they aren't.

No they aren't. If you believe that, you're as dumb as LT.

They're the only ones who lobby for this sort of thing. Why you would believe anything different is beyond me.

Who is being held accountable for this guy?
http://www.mypokecard.com/en/Gallery/my/galery/5xg3mRKDb28l.jpg

The only one who should be held accountable: himself. Because he was a mentally ill psychopath who chose to commit a horrible crime.

 

[richard_daily]

They're the only ones who lobby for this sort of thing. Why you would believe anything different is beyond me.

Ah, just some "feelings" from a wingnut... got it.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-12-02-paternity-usat_x.htm

Men's rights groups aren't advancing everywhere. California Gov. Gray Davis vetoed a bill in September that was opposed by women's organizations. It would have given men two years after discovering they weren't the father to produce the DNA evidence to prove it. Florida paternity fraud bills died this year. A package of bills passed the Michigan House 102-0 but is stalled in the Senate.

Tell us again how feminists aren't fighting to defend paternity fraud?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

They're the only ones who lobby for this sort of thing. Why you would believe anything different is beyond me.



The only one who should be held accountable: himself. Because he was a mentally ill psychopath who chose to commit a horrible crime.

Richard Daily is a male feminist cuck. He will categorically deny any evidence that is presented that disfavors feminists. Watch his response to my previous post. It's documented right there in USAToday and he will deny that it was documented.

 

[Cmdr_L]

Ah, just some "feelings" from a wingnut... got it.

The irony here is palpable.

Also, I guess classical Liberals are wingnuts now. Progressives in action, ladies and gents.

Richard Daily is a male feminist cuck. He will categorically deny any evidence that is presented that disfavors feminists. Watch his response to my previous post. It's documented right there in USAToday and he will deny that it was documented.

>male feminist cuck
Why be redundant?

But yeah, I'm no stranger to SOCJUS. This is standard operating procedure for them: deny reality and claim anyone who disagrees is some kind of thought criminal.

 

[richard_daily]

Richard Daily is a male feminist cuck. He will categorically deny any evidence that is presented that disfavors feminists. Watch his response to my previous post. It's documented right there in USAToday and he will deny that it was documented.

Nothing you've posted mentions feminism.

The reality of the situation is that women terrify you, and that's why you'll never have one.

 

[JinSun]

Who is being held accountable for this guy?
http://www.mypokecard.com/en/Gallery/my/galery/5xg3mRKDb28l.jpg

Glad to see there's still respect for old memes m'lady.

 

[Cmdr_L]

Nothing you've posted mentions feminism.

The reality of the situation is that women terrify you, and that's why you'll never have one.

Ah yes, the good old "you disagree with this ideology which claims to speak for all women (although in reality only 26% of American women and 18% of British women actually support it) therefore you hate/are afraid of all women" fallacy.

I mean, I'm not saying that you're an idiot, but you're an idiot.

 

[richard_daily]

Ah yes, the good old "you disagree with this ideology which claims to speak for all women (although in reality only 26% of American women and 18% of British women actually support it) therefore you hate/are afraid of all women" fallacy.

I mean, I'm not saying that you're an idiot, but you're an idiot.

And yet, nothing in any article LT is posting says anything about feminism.... Just more MRA butthurt from guys who have trouble with women and can't figure out why.

 

[Cmdr_L]

And yet, nothing in any article LT is posting says anything about feminism.... Just more MRA butthurt from guys who have trouble with women and can't figure out why.

Are you aware you're being intellectually dishonest? Or is it just a reflex? Do they teach you to think like that in Gender Studies? Because they should teach you to flip burgers, it'll better prepare you for life after college with that degree.

Of course, if your strategy is to ignore obvious subtext and interpret things as literally as possible when it suits you, and turnabout is fair play, then where did anything in the thread mention MRAs? Not very fun having your own bullshit turned on you, isn't it?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Richard Daily is a male feminist cuck. He will categorically deny any evidence that is presented that disfavors feminists. Watch his response to my previous post. It's documented right there in USAToday and he will deny that it was documented.

r/TheRedPill is strong in this one.

This isn't about feminism. It's about one moron who left his wife and never got a divorce.

 

[bronzeage]

Are you aware you're being intellectually dishonest? Or is it just a reflex? Do they teach you to think like that in Gender Studies? Because they should teach you to flip burgers, it'll better prepare you for life after college with that degree.

Of course, if your strategy is to ignore obvious subtext and interpret things as literally as possible when it suits you, and turnabout is fair play, then where did anything in the thread mention MRAs? Not very fun having your own bullshit turned on you, isn't it?

fucking newbs

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

The irony here is palpable.

Also, I guess classical Liberals are wingnuts now. Progressives in action, ladies and gents.



>male feminist cuck
Why be redundant?

But yeah, I'm no stranger to SOCJUS. This is standard operating procedure for them: deny reality and claim anyone who disagrees is some kind of thought criminal.

Ah yes, the good old "you disagree with this ideology which claims to speak for all women (although in reality only 26% of American women and 18% of British women actually support it) therefore you hate/are afraid of all women" fallacy.

I mean, I'm not saying that you're an idiot, but you're an idiot.

Are you aware you're being intellectually dishonest? Or is it just a reflex? Do they teach you to think like that in Gender Studies? Because they should teach you to flip burgers, it'll better prepare you for life after college with that degree.

Of course, if your strategy is to ignore obvious subtext and interpret things as literally as possible when it suits you, and turnabout is fair play, then where did anything in the thread mention MRAs? Not very fun having your own bullshit turned on you, isn't it?

Welp, looks like you know this guy inside and out already...

 

[Cmdr_L]

fucking newbs

wow ebin pwnage much rekt +1 upboat XDDDDDDDDD

Welp, looks like you know this guy inside and out already...

I mean for all intents and purposes 90% of SJWs might as well be the same person, since they all use the same arguments. And by arguments I mean logical fallacies.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

wow ebin pwnage much rekt +1 upboat XDDDDDDDDD


I mean for all intents and purposes 90% of SJWs might as well be the same person, since they all use the same arguments. And by arguments I mean logical fallacies.

SJWs have no sense of self-awareness. They and the Conservatives are all the same thing, the difference is who they hate.

 

[Cmdr_L]

SJWs have no sense of self-awareness. They and the Conservatives are all the same thing, the difference is who they hate.

Yeah, the Regressive Left and the Religious Right are quickly becoming indistinguishable.

 

[richard_daily]

You two make a cute couple.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Anybody who uses SJW as a slur as self identified as the villain. They wish their parents a miserable Christmas. They kick puppies down flights of stairs. They use sour milk in their coffee and they would have gotten away with it if not for those meddling teens.

 

[Cmdr_L]

You two make a cute couple.

Oh boi you sure showed me

Anybody who uses SJW as a slur as self identified as the villain. They wish their parents a miserable Christmas. They kick puppies down flights of stairs. They use sour milk in their coffee and they would have gotten away with it if not for those meddling teens.

Ah yes, because bad people have never claimed to be the good guys fighting for justice and to liberate the oppressed as an excuse to push authoritarianism. Not at all.

Well, you know, besides

Stalin
Hitler
Mao
Castro
Mugabe

I could go on, but you get the point. "SJW" is sarcastic: if I were to describe them accurately, I'd call them social authoritarians, or the regressive left. When the majority of the outspoken opponents to your "social movement" are Liberals, you have a serious problem.

There's a man named George Orwell who would like a word with you.