Feminism doesn't want equality, it wants female superiority. Proof.

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uk...often-end-up-getting-arrested-themselves.html

Male victims of domestic abuse are reluctant to report attacks because they are often subjected to false accusations themselves, according to new research.

More than 700,000 men each year are thought to fall victim to violent attacks at the hands of their partners, but many are too ashamed to report the offences.

It was thought much of the underreporting was due to men feeling embarrassed by the stigma of being a domestic violence victim.

But new research has suggested that many of those who do come forward risk being arrested themselves, after their abusers make false accusations against them.

And there's no feminist movement to change this reality.

 

[AnAmericanDarling]

Few men report abuse because they're afraid of damaged egos and looking effeminate. It has nothing to do with the Feminist movement. Move on.

 

[psiberzerker]

And there's no feminist movement to change this reality.

So, you just proved that you don't know any feminists. We talk about it all the time. (I'm not a feminist, but we talk about it, with our feminist friends, all the time.)

Few men report abuse because they're afraid of damaged egos and looking effeminate. It has nothing to do with the Feminist movement. Move on.

One of many reasons. It's domestic/sexual abuse. Very few victims report it, across the board. Male victims are much less likely to report, but for may different reasons. Another one due to sexism is because most can't admit to themselves they're being abused by women.

Because the (Feminist) narrative that men were abusers, and women victims. They no longer believe this, it was an attitude in the movement on into the 70s, but gradually went away as studies like this started actually being done.

RAINN was a major part of it. In fact, the single most common household abuse is Maternal. Mothers, abusing their children, physically, sexually, emotionally... However, due to conservative views, this was unthinkable until recently.

That's equality. Women can be at least as nasty as men.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Women beating up their husbands is actually a matter of mirth, and has been for as long as I remember. Maggie was constantly thumping Jiggs with a rolling pin or frying pan or other kitchen implement. Likewise Cora Dithers and her husband. In TV shows or comic strips, you'll quickly lose track of the number of times a woman slaps or kicks or pummels her SO.

 

[richard_daily]

More whining and crying from Lit's Incel club.

 

[psiberzerker]

Once again, arguing with the straw-feminists from a quarter of a century ago.

 

[richard_daily]

Once again, arguing with the straw-feminists from a quarter of a century ago.

Valarie Solanas was right.

 

[psiberzerker]

Valarie Solanas was right.

She wan't always right, no one is. A lot has changed. She's a heroine of the Lesbians, and, kind of a product of her generation. Rebelling against the patriarchy of the 50/60s.

And yeah, full-on patriarchy, with a boner. We've come a long way, but we're not done. We're never done.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Few men report abuse because they're afraid of damaged egos and looking effeminate. It has nothing to do with the Feminist movement. Move on.

Fucking bullshit. The facts clearly show it's because he'd be arrested instead. So fuck off.

So, you just proved that you don't know any feminists. We talk about it all the time. (I'm not a feminist, but we talk about it, with our feminist friends, all the time.)

One of many reasons. It's domestic/sexual abuse. Very few victims report it, across the board. Male victims are much less likely to report, but for may different reasons. Another one due to sexism is because most can't admit to themselves they're being abused by women.

Because the (Feminist) narrative that men were abusers, and women victims. They no longer believe this, it was an attitude in the movement on into the 70s, but gradually went away as studies like this started actually being done.

O'rly now?

https://www.theduluthmodel.org/what-is-the-duluth-model/frequently-asked-questions/

When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the circumstances of that violence tend to differ from when men use violence. Men’s use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional experiences. Women’s use of violence does not have the same kind of societal support. Many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Their violence is used primarily to respond to and resist the violence used against them. On the societal level, women’s violence against men has a trivial effect on men compared to the devastating effect of men’s violence against women.

Tell me again how I don't know any feminists when the feminists who created the Duluth Model, the legal guidestone for domestic violence law in America, say domestic violence against men is trivial "on the societal level" despite the fact that the prevailing reaction to battered men IS TO ARREST MALE VICTIMS because fucking nobody believes them and society still makes jokes about men getting beaten up.

Here's them again mocking male victims.
https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/tiger-woods-accident/n12622

Here's more feminists mocking and belittling the issue of battered men:
https://jezebel.com/294383/have-you-ever-beat-up-a-boyfriend-cause-uh-we-have

Tell me again how I know no feminists at all when I've shown you three examples of feminists who do exactly what I say they do. I can bury you under even more examples if you really want to keep running your ignorant flap.

RAINN was a major part of it. In fact, the single most common household abuse is Maternal. Mothers, abusing their children, physically, sexually, emotionally... However, due to conservative views, this was unthinkable until recently.

Bullshit. Feminists stifle all discussion of maternal abuse of kids because it interrupts their TOXIC MASCULINITY narrative.

There's no campaign out there to educate women not to beat up their husbands, there's no campaign out there to educate women not to abuse their kids. None, zero, zip, nada. Feminists will never allow such a thing because, again, it contradicts their enduring "evil muh soggy knees" narrative.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

More whining and crying from Lit's Incel club.

And the still-a-virgin male feminist defender of violence against men shows up right on time.

 

[psiberzerker]

Tell me again how I know no feminists

Personally, or you've heard of, cherrypicked for bad examples? Do you know Donald Trump, too? Because I can pull out all kinds of shitty stuff men say, AND don't use it as evidence of Patriarchy.

Feminists stifle all discussion of maternal abuse of kids because it interrupts their TOXIC MASCULINITY narrative.

Not the ones I know, work with, and help the victims, deal with their abuse. Male victims. Active feminists (And allies) dealing with trauma, and working past it. Are there feminists that continue this toxic narrative? Yes, there's also TERFs that att attack me for having a penis, and won't let me in their parties.

You know what? Real modern feminists, don't take them seriously. But, there's conservative assholes in every group. Even this one.

There's no campaign out there to educate women not to beat up their husbands, there's no campaign out there to educate women not to abuse their kids.

You want more organizations you can join, to help with our campaigns to do just that? Websites you can volunteer at, and talk to real victims, real advocates (And incidentally, quite a few real feminists) who are actively working on such campaigns? I mostly work with RAINN, and Incest survivors, further sub-specialized in Covert incest, because I grew up with it, and that's where I got help in the first place.

Feminists will never allow such a thing because, again, it contradicts their enduring "evil muh soggy knees" narrative.

Never, as in since 1992, when I started working with them? It's not even that new. If you do happen to get involved, try not to attack victims whenever you're triggered by the thought of feminism. They don't need it, but I can provide you with several links, if you're truly interested.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Personally, or you've heard of, cherrypicked for bad examples? Do you know Donald Trump, too? Because I can pull out all kinds of shitty stuff men say, AND don't use it as evidence of Patriarchy.

You go right ahead and fire that gun. It's not like everyone hears about how evil men are every fucking day. It's women who get free passes and far less publicity when they do bad things. How about you go look up Betty Swollocks and her little sex slavery stint she pulled. No jail time. That's less than what Brock Turner got. No fucking protests whatsoever. No one cared.

Not the ones I know, work with, and help the victims, deal with their abuse. Male victims. Active feminists (And allies) dealing with trauma, and working past it. Are there feminists that continue this toxic narrative? Yes, there's also TERFs that att attack me for having a penis, and won't let me in their parties.

Not All Feminists Are Like That!

But yet these same feminist trashburgers will fucking lose their ever loving shit whenever someone says "not all men are like that".

You know what? Real modern feminists, don't take them seriously. But, there's conservative assholes in every group. Even this one.

ALL of the feminists who have appreciable media presence or political power are part of the radicalized fearmongering machine. The ones you're talking about, have zero power to make any difference at all in terms of changing laws.

You want more organizations you can join, to help with our campaigns to do just that? Websites you can volunteer at, and talk to real victims, real advocates (And incidentally, quite a few real feminists) who are actively working on such campaigns? I mostly work with RAINN, and Incest survivors, further sub-specialized in Covert incest, because I grew up with it, and that's where I got help in the first place.

RAINN is way out in the doghouse in the outback for having said there's no such thing as rape culture. Their feminist card was pulled long ago.

Never, as in since 1992, when I started working with them? It's not even that new. If you do happen to get involved, try not to attack victims whenever you're triggered by the thought of feminism. They don't need it, but I can provide you with several links, if you're truly interested.

Attack victims? Nah, I'm not a Trump supporter, that's not how I roll. I don't make it a habit to become the monster that I despise.

I said there's campaign out there to educate women not to beat up their husbands, there's no campaign out there to educate women not to abuse their kids. I'm calling your bluff. What cards ya holdin', son?

 

[psiberzerker]

It's not like everyone hears about how evil men are every fucking day.

Which is why we're trying to change that narrative. It's not helping anyone, and we've been doing it for decades. I personally have been figting it for over a decade.

It's women who get free passes and far less publicity when they do bad things.

Some women, some bad things, and not free passes. ileen Wournos did some very bad things, and she didn't get any free passes, just a movie made of her story. (Also, if you like Charleze Theron, it's one of her best roles.

Not All Feminists Are Like That!

Right, not all anyone is like that. Not all men, not all women, not all feminists, and not all assholes on the internet. Some of us know what we're talking about, from decades of experience, with feminists, and victims.

the feminists who have appreciable media presence or political power are]/quote]

The ones who are out there attention whoring, instead of working with the victims.

The ones you're talking about, have zero power to make any difference at all in terms of changing laws

Because we're working with the victims, instead of attention whoring, and helping to write useless laws that psychopaths, and child molesters don't follow anyway, because they're compulsive triggered abusers. You know what? Speeding is illegal, the cops can't stop that. Murder is illegal, and the cops can't stop that.

RAINN is way out in the doghouse in the outback[/url] for having said there's no such thing as rape culture. Their feminist card was pulled long ago.

Because we're not a Feminist group. We're a victim's rights, and advocacy group. If you want to help, I have to warn you, there are a lot of Good feminists there, that don't hate men.

Attack victims?

You don't have to attack victims. You would just have to lose your temper on an Advocate, in front of a victim of paternal abuse. (Becue abusive fathers also abuse their wives. The victim's mothers.) So, you could still trigger them, if one of the women triggered you, and guess what, most of the Feminists at RAINN are survivors too.

I said there's campaign out there to educate women not to beat up their husbands, there's no campaign out there to educate women not to abuse their kids.

Let me get back to my other computer, and I'll start compiling a comprehensive list... We educate everyone. Men, Women, and children. About violence, and what leads to violence, but you've obviously been victimized, or victimized, and you attack people. You might want to start online, and work your way up in person, because Rage doesn't make you very helpful. It makes us look like Antifa, and other rage based advocates.

As you pointed out, there's too much of that already.

 

[psiberzerker]

This is primarily Sexual abuse, not Domestic Violence.

http://www.endsexualviolence.org/where_we_stand/male-victims/

http://www.quora.com/How-do-I-deal-with-my-emotionally-abusive-girlfriend

I'm just spitballing here, but you present like an Emotional abuse victim. Not an accusation, but you share some signs. (This is ways to work with such an Abuser. Several similar questions/answers linked.)

http://www.thehotline.org

All domestic abuse. (LGBTA as well) I can vouch for these people personally. If you know a battered husband, or suspect, you might want to send them here.

http://www.helpguide.org/articles/abuse/help-for-men-who-are-being-abused.htm

My back is killing me, and this computer doesn't have much power (Only one plugin for the chargers) but if you want more, or more focused links, I can help you narrow it down. Really a long list, depending on what you need, but we network, and cross-share, so you can also find more just getting active in the communities...

You can also PM me with a Rough location, if you want help finding services in your area...

 

[Jada59]

Few men report abuse because they're afraid of damaged egos and looking effeminate. It has nothing to do with the Feminist movement. Move on.

I believe that there are many and they do not report it but not necessarily for the reasons you state. Sometimes it is a fear of being believed. Other times (and I have seen this happen), the woman will falsely claim that the guy hurt her instead and keep up this charade until the guy gets arrested.

It's a sad situation and I know far too many abused people of both genders.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Which is why we're trying to change that narrative. It's not helping anyone, and we've been doing it for decades. I personally have been figting it for over a decade.

Well, you said you're not a feminist group, just a group with some nameless feminists in it, so that doesn't change my point - that the feminists with political and media power are corrupt as fuck. You aren't corrupt, though, and that's a good thing.

Some women, some bad things, and not free passes. ileen Wournos did some very bad things, and she didn't get any free passes, just a movie made of her story. (Also, if you like Charleze Theron, it's one of her best roles.

A LOT of women, actually. Since Laurel went chickenshit and started banning people for bringing up certain types of sex crimes, I can't list out to you the documented shit that women get caught doing, up to and including a fully institutional level, that gets no outcry, and no attention from the media, even in this age of #MeToo. For instance male victims of women rapists get punished by the government with child support if the rapist gets pregnant. A handful of women get the book thrown at them - but government statistics state women get less punishment than men for the same crime.

Which feminist group is out protesting the sentencing gap? None. Maybe your group is, but again you said you're not a feminist group. Still, whatever group you're working with, y'all are decent peeps.

The ones who are out there attention whoring, instead of working with the victims.

Yeah but they've got all the political power. Literally the Duluth "violence against men is trivial" Model is the de facto law of the land in terms of domestic violence. That is why it's a rule that battered men are arrested when they call the cops.

I admire your efforts at an egalitarian solution to things, and I wish you the best of luck, but you're never going to have the power to override the agenda of these feminists in power. The mockery and often outright punishment of battered men is never going to change, because "you go, girl" is how almost all Americans feel and always will feel about women battering men.

Because we're working with the victims, instead of attention whoring, and helping to write useless laws that psychopaths, and child molesters don't follow anyway, because they're compulsive triggered abusers. You know what? Speeding is illegal, the cops can't stop that. Murder is illegal, and the cops can't stop that.

Speeding and murder isn't condoned by the majority of the populace. But when you cut off a man's dick for wanting to divorce you, you can command a crowd of women cheering on the incident. See this video to know how most Americans feel about violence against men. A whole crowd of women cheered this innocent man's castration. What evidence is there that a crowd of women in real life would be any different?

No, I don't trust women in general to be offended at a woman's violence against men. I can't trust men to have a problem with it, why the fuck would I look to women to police their own? Yeah yeah muh soggy knees, but until I see women marching in the streets to protest the justice system's leniency toward female sexual abusers, and the humorous depiction of women's violence against men, I'm sticking to those guns. And once again, I don't trust men on this issue, either, especially not the male feminists. But at least you're doing something to fight this tide, and that's commendable.

This is something that is impossible to change, because it's biological, not cultural. To change people's attitudes about domestic violence against men you don't need feminism or RAINN - you pretty much need transhumanism.

Because we're not a Feminist group. We're a victim's rights, and advocacy group. If you want to help, I have to warn you, there are a lot of Good feminists there, that don't hate men.

Well if they're working in your group, RAINN and whatever, it follows that they must be good. I don't follow the "the only good feminist is a dead one" line of thinking For one, black feminists are actually loaded with true egalitarians. Seen and posted about them frequently. (Which is strange, considering how much shit black women catch from black men.)

You don't have to attack victims. You would just have to lose your temper on an Advocate, in front of a victim of paternal abuse. (Becue abusive fathers also abuse their wives. The victim's mothers.) So, you could still trigger them, if one of the women triggered you, and guess what, most of the Feminists at RAINN are survivors too.

I actually play nice first. I only lose my temper when someone tries to jump up my ass about something. I don't just consider someone's face a delicacy on sight.

Let me get back to my other computer, and I'll start compiling a comprehensive list... We educate everyone. Men, Women, and children. About violence, and what leads to violence, but you've obviously been victimized, or victimized, and you attack people. You might want to start online, and work your way up in person, because Rage doesn't make you very helpful. It makes us look like Antifa, and other rage based advocates.

As you pointed out, there's too much of that already.

Antifa is different. In World War II we were all Antifa. Nowadays if you get cornered by a buncha Nazis, Antifa is the only element around that will jump in for your defense. The cops won't, bystanders won't, no one will, except them if they're around. Just ask those preachers during that Unite the Right rally. They're literally our last line of physical defense against violent madmen.

As for victimization, no, I've seen many people get victimized, mostly emotionally, sometimes physically. I have seen how the world mocks them - especially men - and being the only person to stand up or speak up in almost all cases has been what defines me.

In any case, it's never NOT heroic to post links to egalitarian abuse support resources. We need more of those.

 

[psiberzerker]

Antifa is different. In World War II we were all Antifa.

No, we weren't. As a whole, we kind of went that way, eventually, but we pretty much stayed out of it until Japan attacked us, and gave the allied forces a ride to Normandy. There were plenty of Fascist and even Nazi sympathisers here. It got covered up for Political Correctness.

Antifa is basically Antifascist Sentiment. the people out there with Molotovs, and bandanas aren't Antifa, they're the Face of Antifa. For another example, you had the Occupation (Same people, BTW.) chanting "We are the 99%!"

I was in Portland buiding Right to dream @, the joke around camp was "They're keeping the cops, and the press Occupied."

I suggested they chant "We represent, the 99%!" It's maybe a little more Factual, if they actually were the 99%, then they could surround the Beltway and shut down Washington, but they didn't even have 1% of the 99%. It's just something they used to say.

So, what people Think when you say "Antifa" is batically the people who Claim to represnet US. The rest of us, who're against Nazis, and White Supremacists, but would prefer something a little more effective than using Terror Tactics against Terror Tactics.

You're not Captain America, and Hitler is Dead. Punching Nazis just lets them play the victim.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Well, you said you're not a feminist group, just a group with some nameless feminists in it, so that doesn't change my point - that the feminists with political and media power are corrupt as fuck. You aren't corrupt, though, and that's a good thing.


A LOT of women, actually. Since Laurel went chickenshit and started banning people for bringing up certain types of sex crimes, I can't list out to you the documented shit that women get caught doing, up to and including a fully institutional level, that gets no outcry, and no attention from the media, even in this age of #MeToo. For instance male victims of women rapists get punished by the government with child support if the rapist gets pregnant. A handful of women get the book thrown at them - but government statistics state women get less punishment than men for the same crime.

Which feminist group is out protesting the sentencing gap? None. Maybe your group is, but again you said you're not a feminist group. Still, whatever group you're working with, y'all are decent peeps.


Yeah but they've got all the political power. Literally the Duluth "violence against men is trivial" Model is the de facto law of the land in terms of domestic violence. That is why it's a rule that battered men are arrested when they call the cops.

I admire your efforts at an egalitarian solution to things, and I wish you the best of luck, but you're never going to have the power to override the agenda of these feminists in power. The mockery and often outright punishment of battered men is never going to change, because "you go, girl" is how almost all Americans feel and always will feel about women battering men.


Speeding and murder isn't condoned by the majority of the populace. But when you cut off a man's dick for wanting to divorce you, you can command a crowd of women cheering on the incident. See this video to know how most Americans feel about violence against men. A whole crowd of women cheered this innocent man's castration. What evidence is there that a crowd of women in real life would be any different?

No, I don't trust women in general to be offended at a woman's violence against men. I can't trust men to have a problem with it, why the fuck would I look to women to police their own? Yeah yeah muh soggy knees, but until I see women marching in the streets to protest the justice system's leniency toward female sexual abusers, and the humorous depiction of women's violence against men, I'm sticking to those guns. And once again, I don't trust men on this issue, either, especially not the male feminists. But at least you're doing something to fight this tide, and that's commendable.

This is something that is impossible to change, because it's biological, not cultural. To change people's attitudes about domestic violence against men you don't need feminism or RAINN - you pretty much need transhumanism.


Well if they're working in your group, RAINN and whatever, it follows that they must be good. I don't follow the "the only good feminist is a dead one" line of thinking For one, black feminists are actually loaded with true egalitarians. Seen and posted about them frequently. (Which is strange, considering how much shit black women catch from black men.)


I actually play nice first. I only lose my temper when someone tries to jump up my ass about something. I don't just consider someone's face a delicacy on sight.


Antifa is different. In World War II we were all Antifa. Nowadays if you get cornered by a buncha Nazis, Antifa is the only element around that will jump in for your defense. The cops won't, bystanders won't, no one will, except them if they're around. Just ask those preachers during that Unite the Right rally. They're literally our last line of physical defense against violent madmen.

As for victimization, no, I've seen many people get victimized, mostly emotionally, sometimes physically. I have seen how the world mocks them - especially men - and being the only person to stand up or speak up in almost all cases has been what defines me.

In any case, it's never NOT heroic to post links to egalitarian abuse support resources. We need more of those.

Actually, most of us weren't even born that long ago. I was, but I was just a young child. Even so, I and most people hated Hitler. A game we liked to play was gathering around a fire and placing cardboard boxes in it. When they started burning, we would chant "Hitler's house is burning down," to the tune of "London Bridge is Falling Down."

 

[BotanyBoy]

And there's no feminist movement to change this reality.

It's the core of identity politics....you can't change the very nature of the beast.

White, black, female....all the same brand of bigots.

Antifa is basically Antifascist Sentiment. the people out there with Molotovs, and bandanas aren't Antifa, they're the Face of Antifa.

Funny enough they became the face of modern fascism in the process.

Left wing terrorist.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

No, we weren't. As a whole, we kind of went that way, eventually, but we pretty much stayed out of it until Japan attacked us, and gave the allied forces a ride to Normandy. There were plenty of Fascist and even Nazi sympathisers here. It got covered up for Political Correctness.

Antifa is basically Antifascist Sentiment. the people out there with Molotovs, and bandanas aren't Antifa, they're the Face of Antifa. For another example, you had the Occupation (Same people, BTW.) chanting "We are the 99%!"

I was in Portland buiding Right to dream @, the joke around camp was "They're keeping the cops, and the press Occupied."

I suggested they chant "We represent, the 99%!" It's maybe a little more Factual, if they actually were the 99%, then they could surround the Beltway and shut down Washington, but they didn't even have 1% of the 99%. It's just something they used to say.

So, what people Think when you say "Antifa" is batically the people who Claim to represnet US. The rest of us, who're against Nazis, and White Supremacists, but would prefer something a little more effective than using Terror Tactics against Terror Tactics.

You're not Captain America, and Hitler is Dead. Punching Nazis just lets them play the victim.

Americans SHOT NAZIS ON SIGHT. We built an entire war machine dedicated to wiping them out. We gave zero fucks when the Soviets came for the civilians on their side of the Berlin divide.

We were all Antifa. No, we were meaner than Antifa. Antifa punches Nazis. WE. FUCKING. KILLED. NAZIS.

We bomb terrorists today. Fact. Just ask the Middle East. Nazis are terrorists. We need to start bombing in five minutes.

 

[psiberzerker]

We bomb terrorists today. Nazis are terrorists.

Right, but that's a bad plan. For one thing, terrorists (I agree, Neo-Nazis are terrorists) are decentralized, and routinely use innocent cvilians as armor. Against bombing, that's why they kidnap hostages, if they kidnap an entire Olympic team, they know the goodguys with bombs can't just bomb the building, without killing the hostages.

We could bomb the original real Nazis. (These are terrorists waving the same flag) Because they did have a centralized government, air defense, radar, and factories to bomb. Now, we have smart bombs we can guide through a door jam, so we can hit targets like that with minimal collateral damage.

Surgical Strike. Cut out the tumor, leave the innocents alone. And finally, bombing them pisses them off. That's why we're still bombing the "Middle east" now, and the middle east has doubled in size. (Just add Kazakhstan to the map. That used to be Soviet until we left a power gap there.)

We bred terrorists, here and aboad, to justify military spending. We don't want to win, we want to fight. If we win, we just have to make another enemy. So, it's "You killed my brother, BANG!"

"You killed OUR Brother!"

BOOM...

Bombing just escalates, but if you like your news directed by Michael Bay, then keep on bombing civilians.

 

[psiberzerker]

It's the core of identity politics.

Your whole schtick is Identity Politics. "Liberal! Left wing Terrorists!!!" Your whole argument just now was all Idenitity Politics. identifying the Enemy, defining the "Real Americans, and forcing your politics on people. "A progressive just called me a Nzi!"

"Where? When?"

"Well, you know those progressives, always calling people Nazis."

No, they're not ll the same brand, that's why they're fighting over who's special interests are more important. If they all were the same united front, if they were all still just Civil Rights, then they would still be effective.

What LJ is talking about are Radical Feminists, and they're still not consciously for Female Superiority. It's just assumed, and some of them are terrorists.

That doesn't make feminism a terrorist movement. if there is no feminist movement, then how can they be equivalent to Nazis? You've heard that, right? They're not Nazis. They're not trying to take over the world, and there's real Nazis again.

If you want to fight them, join Antifa, and show them how it's done. (Try not to take out any innocent civilians while yo're at it.)

 

[BotanyBoy]

Your whole schtick is Identity Politics.

No it's not.

You don't see me perpetuating racist/sexist bullshit like "white" privilege and "male" privilege then failing completely to back any of it up.

"Liberal! Left wing Terrorists!!!" Your whole argument just now was all Idenitity Politics. identifying the Enemy, defining the "Real Americans, and forcing your politics on people. "A progressive just called me a Nzi!"

That's not what identity politics is.

They're not Nazis. They're not trying to take over the world, and there's real Nazis again.

They behave just like them....because female supremacist.

There are?? When did that happen?

If you want to fight them, join Antifa, and show them how it's done. (Try not to take out any innocent civilians while yo're at it.)

If I'm fighting Nazis the last thing I'm going to do is join a bunch of dipshits who come out of their basement to set universities on fire to protest AGAINST free speech.

AntiFa has been more Nazi than any groups since the actual Nazis.

 

[psiberzerker]

That's not what identity politics is.

Of course not. That's exactly what you're accusing the feminists of doing. So, it's only IP if THEY do it.

AntiFa has been more Nazi than any groups since the actual Nazis.

This, exactly this. If you accuse progressives of calling you a Nazi. That's an example of Progressives using Identity politics. Your own example. If you call Antifa Nazis, that's what, exactly? Right Wing Liberalism?

You identify as a Right Wing Liberal. That's your Political Identity. You use Identity Politics, you're downright good at it.

Doesn't make it right, it just makes you a hypocrite.

 

[psiberzerker]

Step 1: Identify the enemy. (Feminists)

Step 2: Identify yourself. (Right wing liberal)

Step 3; Ignore their argument, and substitute your own. (She called me a Nazi!)

Step 4: Call them the opposite of their Identity.

Step 5: Go masturbate when someone calls you on it. Come back with the same accusations a few minutes later, and start the same fight over, somewhere else... Rinse, repeat.

That's your playbook. I've seen it more than enough times. You're a hypocrite. Your entire argument is based on proving the enemy, any enemy is the opposite of their identity, so that their argument is invalid.

Identity Politics is feminists are wrong, BECAUSE they are feminists. Therefore I am right. Black people are racist, because they are black. White people are racist, because they are white.

If you're going to use these tactics, you might as well learn the fucking words for it.