FedJudge: "We have charlatans, like the former president, in my view, who don't care about democracy and only care about power."

[jaF0]

Dustin Thompson, US Capitol rioter who said he was following Trump's orders, is found guilty​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.msn.com.icoCNN on MSN.com|30 minutes ago
Federal judge criticizes Trump: "We have charlatans, like the former president, in my view, who don't care about democracy and only care about power."

 

[phrodeau]

Psst… you made a thread about that guy last night.

 

[DirtKnapp]

It isnt a real Judge

 

[phrodeau]

It isnt a real Judge

Reggie Walton was appointed by both Presidents Bush.

 

[butters]

Reggie Walton was appointed by both Presidents Bush.

and he has trump's number, for sure

it's good hearing a judge say it out loud

 

[HisArpy]

and he has trump's number, for sure

it's good hearing a judge say it out loud

Actually, he's violated several of the judicial cannons of ethics by saying so.

He may believe what he said, but to say it in a case not involving Trump himself shows that he is biased against the people who appear in his courtroom if they are perceived by him to be Trump supporters. His failure to recognize his bias and that said bias will impact his judicial decision making is yet another violation of the cannons. The fact that he failed to recuse himself early on due to these issues is an exacerbating factor. As is the fact that he is now perceived to be biased by the general public which harms the judiciary's appearance of fairness and equality.

He fucked up.

 

[ll74]

Actually, he's violated several of the judicial cannons of ethics by saying so.

He may believe what he said, but to say it in a case not involving Trump himself shows that he is biased against the people who appear in his courtroom if they are perceived by him to be Trump supporters. His failure to recognize his bias and that said bias will impact his judicial decision making is yet another violation of the cannons. The fact that he failed to recuse himself early on due to these issues is an exacerbating factor. As is the fact that he is now perceived to be biased by the general public which harms the judiciary's appearance of fairness and equality.

He fucked up.

The case involves 45. He is a part of the majority of filings whether directly or indirectly.

 

[HisArpy]

The case involves 45. He is a part of the majority of filings whether directly or indirectly.

The case doesn't involve Trump as a PARTY. Thus to invoke his name as a basis for the judicial decision, even if only as commentary, is wrong and shows a bias on the part of the judge.

The judge knows this but has let his personal ideology overrun his logic and is now controlling his official acts.

This has created the appearance that a "conservative" or "Jan 6 insurrectionist" can get a "fair trial" in this courtroom before this judge.

 

[ll74]

The case doesn't involve Trump as a PARTY. Thus to invoke his name as a basis for the judicial decision, even if only as commentary, is wrong and shows a bias on the part of the judge.

The judge knows this but has let his personal ideology overrun his logic and is now controlling his official acts.

This has created the appearance that a "conservative" or "Jan 6 insurrectionist" can get a "fair trial" in this courtroom before this judge.

If the defense is using 45 as a defense, then the judge bringing him up is going to happen. Feel free to appeal the case as warranted.

 

[HisArpy]

If the defense is using 45 as a defense, then the judge bringing him up is going to happen. Feel free to appeal the case as warranted.

Sure chief, go ahead and believe in fairies and unicorns if you want. That doesn't change what THE JUDGE is obligated to do under the Cannons of Judicial Ethics.

 

[ll74]

Sure chief, go ahead and believe in fairies and unicorns if you want. That doesn't change what THE JUDGE is obligated to do under the Cannons of Judicial Ethics.

The court is not supposed to be political either...

Yet every single article on the ruling explains that they were appointed by an R or a D. Strange, that.

 

[HisArpy]

The court is not supposed to be political either...

Yet every single article on the ruling explains that they were appointed by an R or a D. Strange, that.

Once again you try to weasel out of your own words.

Why is that? Are you ashamed of them because they've been revealed as the bullshit they truly are?

 

[ll74]

Once again you try to weasel out of your own words.

Why is that? Are you ashamed of them because they've been revealed as the bullshit they truly are?

Lmao...yah, sure.....why not

 

[Rightguide]

Actually, he's violated several of the judicial cannons of ethics by saying so.

He may believe what he said, but to say it in a case not involving Trump himself shows that he is biased against the people who appear in his courtroom if they are perceived by him to be Trump supporters. His failure to recognize his bias and that said bias will impact his judicial decision making is yet another violation of the cannons. The fact that he failed to recuse himself early on due to these issues is an exacerbating factor. As is the fact that he is now perceived to be biased by the general public which harms the judiciary's appearance of fairness and equality.

He fucked up.

Reggie Walton sits on the FISC. I wonder if he was involved in granting phony FISA warrants against Trump officials and if so was he motivated by his now demonstrated bias against Trump?

 

[ll74]

Reggie Walton sits on the FISC> I wonder if he was involved in granting phony FISA warrants against Trump officials and if so was he motivated by his now demonstrated bias against Trump?

Lmao....it all makes sense now

 

[jaF0]

Dude's been on the Federal Bench in one capacity or another for 40 years. I get the impression he knows a wee bit more about Judging that Derpy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggie_Walton

Not only appointed by Shrub and Daddy, but St Ronnie too.

 

[icanhelp1]

Actually, he's violated several of the judicial cannons of ethics by saying so.

He may believe what he said, but to say it in a case not involving Trump himself shows that he is biased against the people who appear in his courtroom if they are perceived by him to be Trump supporters. His failure to recognize his bias and that said bias will impact his judicial decision making is yet another violation of the cannons. The fact that he failed to recuse himself early on due to these issues is an exacerbating factor. As is the fact that he is now perceived to be biased by the general public which harms the judiciary's appearance of fairness and equality.

He fucked up.

Kind of reminds ya of judge Emmet Sullivan

 

[KeithD]

How quaint that Harpy is still sucking Trump.

 

[HisArpy]

How quaint that Harpy is still sucking Trump.

Lol, I don't care WHO it is, if you break the law with the intent to harm someone else, you deserve to be fucked with a sharp pitchfork. Twice.

At this point, Trump seems to be guiltless except in your TDS afflicted mind. The judge at issue in this thread also appears to be stricken with TDS to the point he's allowing it to color his judgements and decisions.

 

[HisArpy]

Dude's been on the Federal Bench in one capacity or another for 40 years. I get the impression he knows a wee bit more about Judging that Derpy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggie_Walton

Not only appointed by Shrub and Daddy, but St Ronnie too.

If that were the case, he'd not be saying the shit he's saying in his official capacity.

 

[Champakian]

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/04/the_judge_in_a_january_6_case_should_be_disbarred.html

 

[HisArpy]

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/04/the_judge_in_a_january_6_case_should_be_disbarred.html

I said it first.

 

[HisArpy]

Don’t you hate when they go judge shopping

Most courtrooms aren't any better than Walmart.