Fearing govt shutdown, Chuck U agrees to $1.6 billion for border wall

[TalkRadio1]

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) admitted Tuesday that he has conceded some ground in negotiations with President Donald Trump over the proposed border wall, and liberals are furious over it.

“The $1.6 billion for border security negotiated by Democrats and Republicans is our position,” Schumer said at the media briefing.

Schumer later tweeted a clarification, saying that Trump would cause a government shutdown if he didn’t agree to the Democrats’ terms.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...-on-the-wall-and-liberals-are-furious-over-it

 

[Luk]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...-on-the-wall-and-liberals-are-furious-over-it

Why do all of your headlines never match the content of the articles you link? I guess being a disingenuous douchebag don't pay after all.

 

[chillywilly2]

Why do all of your headlines never match the content of the articles you link? I guess being a disingenuous douchebag don't pay after all.

But the point is....Lukkk..you're getting a BORDER WALL...yahooooo

 

[Luk]

But the point is....Lukkk..you're getting a BORDER WALL...yahooooo

Nope, never gonna happen.

 

[Laura_Junius]

Nope, never gonna happen.

I hope you're right, but I fear you're not.

 

[Luk]

I hope you're right, but I fear you're not.

The next president will have a functional and not racist brain, I'm right, don't worry.

 

[Gamine67]

How would we know, it’s pretty much been shutdown since that fat fucks been watching TV in the Oval Office.

 

[von_Bismarck]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/...-on-the-wall-and-liberals-are-furious-over-it

STFU, miles.

 

[Kirkrapine]

What would a wall do that a fence wouldn't?

 

[chillywilly2]

What would a wall do that a fence wouldn't?

At my house...its keeps the heat in in winter...a fence wouldn't do that

 

[HisArpy]

What would a wall do that a fence wouldn't?

Ask China. They might have an answer you haven't heard before.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Ask China. They might have an answer you haven't heard before.

Or any of the (D)'s he worships who live behind them in walled off communities.

Bet you won't find many refugees or passed out junkies in Obama's neighborhood!!!

 

[bellisarius]

The trick with the wall is not where the wall is but where it isn't. The naysayers continually bring up the absurdity of building a wall across the entire border. Not only is that not the plan, it's not even desired.

Humans, being the lazy louts we are, will invariably take the path of least resistance. That means heading towards they places where the wall isn't. Places where manpower can be concentrated. Far fewer people will be required to patrol and defend those places where the wall is. It's the "Castle Strategy" that goes back as far as mankind itself.

Those sections of the border that do not have a wall can be monitored in any number of different ways based on technology. Manpower resources can be deployed as required, where required.

 

[Rightguide]

He'll want amnesty in return for what's really needed.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Ask China. They might have an answer you haven't heard before.

They were dealing with invaders, not immigrants. And the Great Wall never seems to have kept out invaders anyway.

I recall a line from The Journeyer, by Gary Jennings, a historical novel about the life of Marco Polo, who notoriously made no mention of the Great Wall in his memoirs, leading some to doubt their authenticity. In Jennings' version, Polo simply did not consider the wall worth mentioning, because: A Mongol tells Polo, "No army has ever had any trouble getting past the wall. All they had to do was bribe the sentries with a bit of silver. No wall is higher or stronger or more forbidding than the men behind it." The Border Patrol is not strong or forbidding, only well-armed.

 

[Que]

Only one of the two parties in America is in favor of motor -voter laws, opposed to voter ID laws, wins nearly every recount, typically leads in mail-in ballots, is opposed to cleaning up voter rules of duplicates, felons and the dead, allowing felons to vote, is In favor of amnesty, and opposed to border enforcement and deportation.

If the border wall will not impact their electoral prospects, and they've never seen an expensive government boondoggle that they don't claim will stimulate the economy, why should they oppose it so vociferously?

Why?

We know why!

 

[SissySalina]

Could have sworn HE said Mexico would pay for the wall, so why does HE need to budget money?

 

[Luk]

Only one of the two parties in America is in favor of motor -voter laws, opposed to voter ID laws, wins nearly every recount, typically leads in mail-in ballots, is opposed to cleaning up voter rules of duplicates, felons and the dead, allowing felons to vote, is In favor of amnesty, and opposed to border enforcement and deportation.

If the border wall will not impact their electoral prospects, and they've never seen an expensive government boondoggle that they don't claim will stimulate the economy, why should they oppose it so vociferously?

Why?

We know why!

Only one party supports a treasonous wannabe dictator who supports White Nationalists, Russia, and Saudi's murderous regime all the while you dumbfucks are complicit in his attempt to destroy the fabric of America.

 

[HisArpy]

Only one party supports a treasonous wannabe dictator who supports White Nationalists, Russia, and Saudi's murderous regime all the while you dumbfucks are complicit in his attempt to destroy the fabric of America.

Lol., so much fail.

 

[Luk]

Lol., so much fail.

Dear gawd, go away, little Timmy.

 

[HisArpy]

Dear gawd, go away, little Timmy.

More fail. And you know what the best part is? You're doing it to YOURSELF!

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/Laugh.gif

 

[Busybody18]

Only one party supports a treasonous wannabe dictator who supports Terrorist Muslims and Black Terrorists, Syria, and Iran's murderous regime all the while you dumbfucks are complicit in his attempt to destroy the fabric of America.

FYP


YW!

 

[Kirkrapine]

Only one of the two parties in America is in favor of motor -voter laws, opposed to voter ID laws, wins nearly every recount, typically leads in mail-in ballots, is opposed to cleaning up voter rules of duplicates, felons and the dead, allowing felons to vote, is In favor of amnesty, and opposed to border enforcement and deportation.

If the border wall will not impact their electoral prospects, and they've never seen an expensive government boondoggle that they don't claim will stimulate the economy, why should they oppose it so vociferously?

Why?

We know why!

Because it's pointless, needless, useless, and an insult to Mexico.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Only one party supports a treasonous wannabe dictator who supports White Nationalists, Russia, and Saudi's murderous regime all the while you dumbfucks are complicit in his attempt to destroy the fabric of America.

LOL says the open border socialist!!!!


Youz funny Luk.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Lol., so much fail.

He can't back any of it up and clearly doesn't know the history of his own preferred party.