FDA to allow morning-after pill over the counter for 17-year-olds

Cathleen

Summer breeze...
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Posts
31,006
Is 17 the new 18? Any thoughts on the subject? Italics mine.



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The "morning-after pill" will be available without a prescription to women 17 and older, the Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday. The minimum age has been 18.

Plan B, also called the morning-after pill, is intended to prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex.

On March 23, a federal court ordered that Plan B, an emergency contraception pill, be made available over the counter to those 17 and up, the agency said in a statement on its Web site. The agency will not appeal that order, the statement said.

In the order, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman also asked the agency to consider whether the pill should be available to women of all ages without a prescription, saying that such a determination is best left to the expertise of the FDA rather than a federal district judge.

And he rebuked the FDA for apparently departing from its own procedures with respect to making decisions on the pill's over-the-counter status, noting the "unusual involvement of the White House in the Plan B decision-making process."

The plaintiffs in the case presented "unrebutted evidence of the FDA's lack of good faith" toward the application to switch Plan B from prescription to non-prescription use, the judge wrote.

"This lack of good faith is evidenced by, among other things, (1) repeated and unreasonable delays, pressure emanating from the White House, and the obvious connection between the confirmation process of two FDA commissioners and the timing of the FDA's decisions; and (2) significant departures from the FDA's normal procedures and policies ... as compared to the review of other switch applications in the past 10 years," Korman wrote.

In August 2006, the FDA approved the sale of Plan B without a prescription to those 18 and older, but those 17 and under needed a prescription to obtain it.

But, the agency said in Wednesday's statement, "in accordance with the court's order, and consistent with the scientific findings since 2005 by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA sent a letter to the manufacturer of Plan B that the company may, upon submission and approval of an appropriate application, market Plan B without a prescription to women 17 years of age and older."

"No useful purpose would be served by continuing to deprive 17-year-olds access to Plan B without a prescription," Korman wrote in his order. "Indeed, the record shows that FDA officials and staff both agreed that 17-year-olds can use Plan B safely without a prescription. The FDA's justification for this age restriction, that pharmacists would be unable to enforce the prescription requirement if the cutoff were age 17, rather than 18, lacks all credibility."

Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards said in a statement that the FDA's announcement is "a strong statement to American women that their health comes before politics. And that's the way it should be. This decision is common-sense policy that will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and protect the health and safety of all women."

The morning-after pill -- made by Duramed, a subsidiary of Barr Pharmaceuticals -- is intended to prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex. It works by stopping ovulation and decreasing the chances that a fertilized egg will attach to the uterus. When used within 72 hours of unprotected sex, it can lower the risk of pregnancy by almost 90 percent, the maker says.

Critics charge that the drug's action amounts to an abortion, and they opposed making it available over the counter.



src
 
IMHO, it should be available to anyone who is sexually active. I've seen the girls in these clinics that are receiving these treatments, they are NOT happy to be there, they are NOT abusing the privilege of advanced medical science. They are there because they have no choice and are embarrassed beyond belief.

In an idyllic world, parents would talk to their kids about sex and it's consequences, but in reality, kids aren't aware of their actions and it's the girls that get held to the fire when the shit hits the fan.

We all want to say, "not my kid!" but how many of us truly communicate openly with our kids to educate them of the realities of life and it's consequences? From the time I was born my mother was completely open and honest when I and my siblings had questions about sex. The ONLY questions she wouldn't answer were personal questions of what she was doing in the bedroom, but any general question, no matter how uncomfortable, was answered in complete honesty. The results were two girls and a boy who were raised to respect themselves and make themselves responsible for their actions and the prevention of any subsequent STD or unwanted pregnancy.

The prevention of unwanted pregnancies start with the parents of the kids - BOTH kids - who are having sex. It is not the fault of the girl alone, why should we make her bear the responsibility of an unwanted pregnancy, which ultimately falls upon the parents and/or society to care for?

And for all those "right to lifer's" out there who want to mandate that all fetus' be born, that's a great idea, as soon as you step your asses up to the plate and take care of them, rather than only preventing the termination then leaving it up to the mother, mothers family, and the rest of society to care for the child and the mother from cradle to grave, which is what has become the life of the welfare system.
 
There's a huge controversy over this here in the uk. The age of consent here is 16 but if a GP believes a child younger than that is sexually active, they can prescribe contraceptive pills and morning after pills without parental knowledge or consent.

Morning after pills are available over the counter after a brief chat with a pharmacist and often they don't bother asking the age of the girl.

There have also been cases that have come to light where very young girls have been allowed to have abortions without parental knowledge or consent. The medical professionals involved have to act in the best interest of their patient and they cannot break confidentiality and tell the girl's family, they can only advise her to do it herself.

Family planning clinics will hand out condoms to children if they believe they are sexually active. The UK has the worst teenage pregnancy rate in Europe and I'm not surprised. The government also facilitates this by handing out houses and benefits to young women who get themselves knocked up. I know women who have become pregnant (without a regular partner or support from one) specifically to get a council house and avoid going out to work. There are now often two or three generations in the same families who have done this and as they all start procreating very young, we have grandmothers in their late 20s/early 30s who still go out on the pull with their own teenaged daughters!

*facepalm*

Overwhelmingly, the other major problem is feckless boys and young men who pressurize young and/or underage girls into unprotected sex and then move on and have nothing to do with them, safe in the knowledge that the taxpayer will pick up the bill of any medical care or children that result. Our government is singularly useless at rounding up deadbeat dads and most of them don't work anyway so whatever they are eventually forced to 'contribute' comes from the public purse to start with. As soon as they learn they've fathered a kid, they stay on benefits to avoid being forced to cough up or only do 'cash in hand' work that is not declared or taxed.

Welcome to Blighty. :eek:
 
Last edited:
Well, considering that the age of consent in most states is 16 it should be at least that low.
 
VelvetDarkness said:
Really? I didn't know that. I thought it was 18 in most US states. Learn something new every day.
It varies from state to state, and in some states there are limits as to how much older the older partner can be.
There are now often two or three generations in the same families who have done this and as they all start procreating very young, we have grandmothers in their late 20s/early 30s who still go out on the pull with their own teenaged daughters!
A friend of mine once taught in a women's prison, and she encountered a couple of inmates who were in their late 30's and already great-grandmothers! :eek:
 
i believe that if you can take your 13 year old daughter to the doctor after she has started her period and put her on birth control then a 17 year old girl who had an accident should be able to help herself.

to be honest my parents were never open to me about sex and never talked to me about it. i believe it is many mistakes parents make. I lost my virginity when i was 13 and it wasnt willingly but needless to say i did things with that particular boy to lead it up to that. Though i know it wasnt my fault. In saying this i shouldnt have been running around with a guy who was 17. BUT if there would have been a morning after pill i would have found a way to get it. I was lucky not to be pregnant by him. I feel the same for other girls. I believe abortions are more damaging to a younger girls body than a pill even though i do not know the full effects of what the pill can do. If i can remember correctly the package said not to be used by anyone under 16. Sooo..so what if a 17 year can get it?

i myself have taken the morning after pill when i had an accident or two. It was before i firmly decided to take birth control(i grew up in a strict catholic home and my mother is still to this day mad that i take birth control). Though i was over 18 i knew i had been under 18 i would have made the same descion. And still to this day i am SO HAPPY i didnt have that guys baby.

I believe that girls and boys will do what they want no matter how firm of a hold parents think they have on them. Also they will find a way to have sex if they really want to. In saying all of this i believe that for a girl who is a young and her parents would not allow birth control because they think that "protects" her from having sex because she just "shouldnt" do it then she should be aloud to protect herself.

I do not see this as any form of "abortion". Also i have known girls under the age of 18 who have had older friends (18 years of age) purchase the morning after pill for them. There is no way of stopping it. Though i believe just as the morning after pill package suggests, that it should NOT be used as a form of birth control. It is merely an emergency pill.

I think this controversy is stupid. I like to think about what chapelle once said(i am serious about this, he was a smart comedian on this one)...how old is 15 really...well think how old is 17 really? I mean those who are on the defense for the other side and are saying hell NO...should really think back to when they were 17. I understand that people want to protect their children but 17 is really close to graduation. No girl i know wants to be pregnant for graduation pictures. Not to mention in my highschool the girls and guys did things parents would fall over cold about. But they never knew.

Its personally no ones business how a young woman tries to protect herself from having the burden of a newborn before she is actually able to begin her own life.

also i agree with a above statement. Infinity706 said that if the legal consent in most states is 16 then it should be legal. I believe this as well. I live in North Carolina and i am a paralegal. I have seen statutory rape cases before. IF a girl of the age of 16 in NC has the capacity to consent to a MAN as old as 4 years older than her then she should be able to buy this pill.

sorry i went off on a tangent. This debate got me heated yesterday. :D
 
Yes - should be availible. Its not a form of birth control that anyone would use on a regular basis. I would suggest that for most gils/women seeking a morning after pill the inconcienence involved in getting it prescribed far outweighs the disadvantages of other froms of birth control. By that logic a service which provides the morning after pill is unlikely to be incorrectly used. Birth control is a basic human right. It shoul be provided to ANYONE (no matter their age) who wishes to avail... Anyone who is responsible enough to seek it should not be refused it.... .my 2c worth
 
I got into a debate with my mom on the subject after writing my earlier post. She believes you CAN die from taking it. And that it is also taking away parents rights. I dont agree. The morning after pill is like a large dosageof birth control. It merely stops the released egg from attaching itself to uterine wall. That way the egg dies and you can recieve your period. It is a released hormone. UGHHH why do people not understand? lol Whether they say no to 17 year olds or not...its going to happen...most 17 year olds have 18 year old friends. Its just a given. Just like 19 and 20 year olds have 21 year old friends who buy beer. Its no different. But ne ways thats all for now ;)
 
UGHHH why do people not understand? lol Whether they say no to 17 year olds or not...its going to happen...most 17 year olds have 18 year old friends. Its just a given. Just like 19 and 20 year olds have 21 year old friends who buy beer. Its no different. But ne ways thats all for now ;)

I agree. Saying "no" will work just as well as making abortions illegal, and we all know how well that worked!:rolleyes: In a perfect world, kids wouldn't be having sex. In a perfect world, parents would take a more proactive roll in their kids' sex education, rather than whining that the schools are teaching tolerance or that Planned Parenthood is promoting underage sex.

I am NOT promoting that under age kids be having sex, but we all know the reality of things, and what is worse, condemning the young women - because they're the ones to bear the burden - or helping them? There are too many variables to say that the cause of teen pregnancy is any one thing, however, lack of education and self-esteem play large rolls in the development of the problem.

I know for a fact that had my parents not been proactive, open, and honest about sex from the time of my birth to the moment I became sexually active, that my life would have taken a much different course, likely with me getting my girlfriend pregnant, and the life altering effects that has.
 
Arrrrrrrrgh it makes me so angry when people call the morning after pill an abortion. It isn't! Natalya you explain it perfectly- I don't understand why its such a big fucking deal for people. Why shouldn't it be available? There is absolutely no reason.
It possibly saved me from becoming a mother (god forbid) at an even younger age than that.
Better to make it available to women of all ages than end up with underage pregnancies, ruined homes, and unemployed girls on government funding.

Sorry thats a gross generalisation I know.
 
Double Standards

The government is aiding and abetting sexual use of a child.
If a photograph of the girl is posted by herself or just in possession it is a Federal crime, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.
Should the FDA be investigated for child seduction and endangerment?
 
The government is aiding and abetting sexual use of a child.
If a photograph of the girl is posted by herself or just in possession it is a Federal crime, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.
Should the FDA be investigated for child seduction and endangerment?

What are you talking about? :confused:
 
Back
Top