Farce or horror story?

REDWAVE

Urban Jungle Dweller
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Posts
6,013
Henry Kissinger, the war criminal who has been brought back, supposedly to get to the bottom of what happened on Sept. 11, is refusing to disclose his global business clients for potential conflicts of interest. The man who's supposed to uncover the truth is starting out by hiding things himself. Is there any doubt whatsoever this will be a coverup commission?

On Sept. 11, the military and intelligence agencies, who suck up billions upon billions of dollars of our money, sat around and did nothing, allowing thousands of Americans to be slaughtered. Bush and the top people in government are guilty of treason and mass murder of their own people. The whole way Bush first stonewalled this investigation, and now is sabotaging it, shows he's got a lot to hide. Bush, Rumsfeld, and Myers (head of the Air Force at the time) are the axis of treason.

They had numerous advance warnings, all of which they ignored. They could easily have scrambled jets to intercept the hijacked airplanes. Instead, they did nothing. The plans for an invasion of Afghanistan were on Bush's desk BEFORE Sept. 11.

If it weren't such a horror story, it would be a farce . . .
 
What do you honestly think the public reaction would have been if jets had been scrambled to blow those planes out of the sky? I'm talking then, not now, when such a think would be understood, if not agreed?
 
Tough talk Red...

Coming from someone who hates our form of government, loathes the military, and embraces a political notion that would have added about a hundred layers to the bureaucracy that let the info slip through in the first place. Your wealth of hypocracy astounds me. :D
 
Replies

RP-- they could have stopped the hijackers before the planes even got off the ground-- if they had wanted to.

LC-- don't shoot the messenger just because you don't like the message.
 
Back
Top