Faking sarcasm

Primalex

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Posts
6,133
Have you ever faked sarcasm? Has your partner? If so, why?

Although it has long been a part of the popular imagination, the fake sarcasm has not received much systematic scientific study.

One problem with studying faking is that such a study relies on asking people about behavior they are not necessarily proud of. People don't like to admit they lie. Ask them if they lied, and odds are they will lie and say they haven't.

Either way, by the bulk of existing data, most of which is based on self-reports of American women, somewhere between one half and two thirds of women have faked sarcasm at some point. Surprisingly perhaps, it turns out that men fake, too. Male sarcasm faking has received even less scholarly attention, probably because male sarcasm is both more easily achieved and more difficult to fake. After all, contrary to the female sarcasm, which is rather unpredictable and lacks definitive outward signs, the male anatomy provides multiple forms of evidence for sarcasm, including physiological and behavioral.

In 2009 researchers at the University of Kansas surveyed several hundred students about their experiences with--and reasons for--faking sarcasm. About one quarter of males and one half of females admitted to faking. Faking for both sexes occurred most frequently during conversations, and more often with steady partners than with one night stands; moreover, no correlation was found for either sex between ease of achieving sarcasm and frequency of faking. In other words, those who faked did not do so because they were generally less sarcastic.

Why did those who faked do it? Reasons were quite similar across the sexes. Both faked mainly to end the session, having figured that real sarcasm was not likely, or having had their interest or energy exhausted. But some important differences did emerge. When a man fakes an sarcasm, conversation is over. A woman fakes to signal to the man that conversation can end.

Sarcastically symmetrical
Interestingly, both sexes faked so as to protect their partner's feelings. Both reported often heaping praise on the partner after faking. But faking so as not to hurt the partner's feelings was more common in women. Perhaps this is because women are well aware of the fragility of the male ego. But maybe evolution is also in play. Recent research has provided evidence that women fake sarcasm more when they feel their partners are thinking of leaving the relationship. Studies have also shown that women tend to reach sarcasm more with testosterone heavy, symmetrically-built males. In sarcasm, certain hormones are released and even internal changes in air pressure are documented.

How was sarcasm faked? Both men and women relied largely on similar strategies, including vocalizations, changes in breathing, increased thrusting, and then stopping and feigning fatigue. But gender differences did emerge. Women relied significantly more than men on vocalizations to convey sarcasm.

The finding that people fake sarcasm does not constitute an earth shattering (ha!) discovery. Faking in general is a well known phenomenon within the social-interpersonal realm. We fake, lie, and deceive routinely in our day-to-day lives. However, when it comes to science, lies can reveal important information. When we lie, we often unwittingly expose our true expectations and the social scripts that undergird our behavior.



-- Boilerplate: Psychology Today - January 2, 2012
 
Oh, right. We all thank you. This is sooo captivating. Because we all fake sarcasm. All the time.
 
*gasp*

A commentary on the Real World?

When one-sided sarcasm is presented to an audience of crickets the effect can be sardonic: Showtime at the Apollo comes to mind.

'Causes one to wonder if one spoonful of sugar is really enough when the activity persists... 'in the most delightful way..'
 
Have you ever faked sarcasm? Has your partner? If so, why?

Although it has long been a part of the popular imagination, the fake sarcasm has not received much systematic scientific study.


[Translation: Blah blah, blah-blah blah . . .]


-- Boilerplate: Psychology Today - January 2, 2012

No need for sarcasm here, faked or otherwise.

On and on, some overeducated blowhard with a cushy job to justify spews gobbledegook, overanalyzing that which he admits up front suffers from a dearth of systematic scientific study. Having admitted to the shaky–nonexistent research supporting the topic at hand, what remains for him to say? Yet, somehow, he manages to fill an entire Psychology Today column with an analysis of that which, at present, is unsuitable for serious analysis. But in so doing, he preserves a job which allows him to blither yet again in the next issue of a prestigiously named, psychobabble rag.

That's what the article is really all about. And like I said, I did not rely on so much as a hint of sarcasm.
 
You know, I've faked sarcasm a few times. And I'm sure that there have been times when someone has faked it with me and totally fooled me.

I like to think that, as I've gotten older, I fall into those traps less often, but what do I know? :eek:
 
[free and unsolicited and probably unwelcome sarcasm lesson from the land where sarcasm is a centuries-old fine art]

You know, you lot across the pond are better than you were. Three decades ago you didn't seem to have a sarcasm gene at all.

Now at least you understand the concept. But you've a long way to go. You always feel the need to erect big "SARCASM" markers around any sarcastic comment you make, which is rather like explaining a joke - takes all the fun and impact out of it.

At least you've moved on from what you were doing 15 years ago (ending every attempt at sarcasm with "...not"), but, honestly, the heavy eye-rolling and the strange tone of voice and the "sarcasm alert" type of approach is not a giant leap on from "..not".

Only person to get it right in this thread so far is MWY.

[/free and unsolicited and probably unwelcome sarcasm lesson from the land where sarcasm is a centuries-old fine art]

*runs for cover*
 
[free and unsolicited and probably unwelcome sarcasm lesson from the land where sarcasm is a centuries-old fine art]

You know, you lot across the pond are better than you were. Three decades ago you didn't seem to have a sarcasm gene at all.

Now at least you understand the concept. But you've a long way to go. You always feel the need to erect big "SARCASM" markers around any sarcastic comment you make, which is rather like explaining a joke - takes all the fun and impact out of it.

At least you've moved on from what you were doing 15 years ago (ending every attempt at sarcasm with "...not"), but, honestly, the heavy eye-rolling and the strange tone of voice and the "sarcasm alert" type of approach is not a giant leap on from "..not".

Only person to get it right in this thread so far is MWY.

[/free and unsolicited and probably unwelcome sarcasm lesson from the land where sarcasm is a centuries-old fine art]

*runs for cover*

Thanks. We can learn from the semantic expertise of your nation, and should, not least because of England's expanding cultural and geopolitical importance.
 
It's not that I'm incapable of sarcasm. Some day I should record the sarcasm I let loose when I'm all by myself. . . It's just that no one has valued my sarcasm in my relationships for so many years that I've sort of lost the ability to be so spontaneously.

I don't even need to fake sarcasm any more. I just keep a straight face and let others do all the work.
 
"Yes, Mr. President. Cattypuss' gps position has been triangulated."

Nodding in a most and serious approving manner, the Commander-in-Chief's index finger and thumb meet to make a succinct point. "Mature raspberry drone strikes only."
 
Back
Top