Fags Confiscate Nations Personal Property

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Should the Supreme Court declare same-sex marriage a constitutional right, only Congress and the federal courts could define marriage, not the states. Since real- and personal-property laws are almost exclusively state laws, the gay-marriage issue is not only about gay marriage but rather about how American society will function and be structured in the future if marriage is declared to be a constitutional right. From WSJ

 

[eyer]

The Supreme Court unconstitutionally allocating itself the power to define marriage...

...is simply the federal government once more doing what all governments eventually always do when left unchecked: corruptly swiping, and then unconstitutionally wielding, more and more power.

The Constitution exists, as the law of the land, to keep all in check equally...

...the People, the States, and the federal government, each one distinguishable by the specific powers and rights the law of the land accords them, both negatively and positively.

Today, over half the people are on the federal dole, and the states themselves are hardly any less dependent...

...reportedly, Ben Franklin, as he left the Pennsylvania Statehouse on Monday, September 17, 1787, was asked:

Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?

A republic, Franklin replied...

...if you can keep it.

The republic is lost...

...the United Socialist State of America is a nation of men, not law.