Extreme section

Glassdreams said:
I was just wondering, what happened to the extreme section?


Methinks that the majority was none too intrigued by paranormal blowjobs and alien butt rape. Just a guess.
 
well I'm not interested in that either, but if you notice its still on the site under non human, I was more talking about the beastiality and things of that sort
 
Glassdreams said:
well I'm not interested in that either, but if you notice its still on the site under non human, I was more talking about the beastiality and things of that sort


*turns green* Whatever floats your boat...
 
here at lit, beastiality is a serious no-no. this place isnt as open-minded as you think.
 
you know what, I was asking a simple question, I wasn't going to say why I was interested but you had to chime in with a comment mystery and you guys have to give me attitude I don't even know you so back the fuck off, but thanks Emerald
 
Glassdreams said:
you know what, I was asking a simple question, I wasn't going to say why I was interested but you had to chime in with a comment mystery and you guys have to give me attitude I don't even know you so back the fuck off, but thanks Emerald


Honey, if you're going to be at Lit, you've got to remember one thing and one thing only- grow Teflon skin. People around here aren't always very nice, or their humour is very sarcastic, and some people are just plain trolls. My comments were TAME compared to other things you'll see here.

And why would you be inquiring about bestiality stories if you weren't looking to read them?

Another thing, apex was right, bestiality IS a serious no-no. It's along the same lines as sex with a child because animals, like minors, can't give their consent. That's why all figures represented in stories have to be 18 or older. I don't usually pass judgment, but- grossville, dude. I'm one of the most liberal minds you'll ever meet and even I have enough sense to know that fantasizing about animals is just fucking sick.

(Now, THAT was giving you attitude).
 
you misunderstood my comment, I meant that I wasn't going to say what I'm interested in because I know what people think, this is the first time I've posted on these forums and I've lost all respect for this website.
 
Glassdreams said:
you misunderstood my comment, I meant that I wasn't going to say what I'm interested in because I know what people think, this is the first time I've posted on these forums and I've lost all respect for this website.

stop. you're gonna make us cry.
 
Well, Hell...

In that case let me be the first to say "Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!"


We have seen so many assholes of the bad kind come and go around here one more is going to make no difference at all.

You won't even be a memory.
 
Glassdreams said:
it's not me who's acting like an asshole.. get your shit straight


You have no clue as to how big of an asshole I can be, AND you don't want to know either.

I'm one of the nicer ones.
 
:eek: What a nice thing to say, Emerald_eyed.

(I thought 90% of the board had me on ignore and another 5% just ignored me out of habit!) :D
 
I'm sure you're not an asshole irl or anything, but I was just trying to get a simple question answered. I'm not a bitch either and I'm not some crazy freak. I just wanted to know.
 
i'm sure you're all aware of what a fantasy is, right? do you think anyone actually had a sexual encounter with a werewolf or an alien? impossible! just cause glassdreams might fantasize about beastiality doesn't mean shes gonna go do things to her pets. and beastiality is so broad, what if she has a "nonconsent" fantasy about a gorilla or something? there are a lot of really outlandish stories on here, i really don't think that you guys were fair to glassdreams. and what about nonconsent and things like that? it's not illegal to fantasize, it doesnt even harm anyone or anything to fantasize about it. i thought that's what literotica was all about: a place to share your fantasies, no matter what they are. i'm sure there are plenty of readers looking at this link right now that probably feel for her but are afraid to post, for fear that they, too, might be seen as an outcast. i guess it comes down to freedom of speech, and you guys have just as much protection under the 5th amendment as she does so bash away, but i just think you should know you are not being fair at all. thats really all i got.
 
MysteryWhiteGirl said:
Another thing, apex was right, bestiality IS a serious no-no. It's along the same lines as sex with a child because animals, like minors, can't give their consent. That's why all figures represented in stories have to be 18 or older. I don't usually pass judgment, but- grossville, dude. I'm one of the most liberal minds you'll ever meet and even I have enough sense to know that fantasizing about animals is just fucking sick.
Actually, there is no policy on Lit. about beastiality - only about sex involving children, and that is not beceause of consent - it is about legality (Lit. is based in California, and I believe even textual stories about child sex there may be illegal) and/or it is about what Laurel and Manu are comfortable with and where they wish to draw the line (which I agree with it). If it was about consent, then we wouldn't have stories about non-consent, would we?

There are and have been stories about beastiality since I have been here. Just to be clear beastiality is certainly not my cup of tea, but not because of a question of consent (which I have debated here on the GB in the past).

In short, not everyone feels the same way you do, so don't pass your personal prejudices off as official Lit. policy.
 
MysteryWhiteGirl said:


Another thing, apex was right, bestiality IS a serious no-no. It's along the same lines as sex with a child because animals, like minors, can't give their consent. That's why all figures represented in stories have to be 18 or older. I don't usually pass judgment, but- grossville, dude. I'm one of the most liberal minds you'll ever meet and even I have enough sense to know that fantasizing about animals is just fucking sick.

(Now, THAT was giving you attitude).


i never said that i thought it was a serious no-no. i said here at lit its a serious no-no. i dont do it myself because im just not attracted to animals. but i dont have a problem with it as long as nothings getting hurt.
 
morbidfetishism said:
i'm sure you're all aware of what a fantasy is, right? do you think anyone actually had a sexual encounter with a werewolf or an alien? impossible! just cause glassdreams might fantasize about beastiality doesn't mean shes gonna go do things to her pets. and beastiality is so broad, what if she has a "nonconsent" fantasy about a gorilla or something? there are a lot of really outlandish stories on here, i really don't think that you guys were fair to glassdreams. and what about nonconsent and things like that? it's not illegal to fantasize, it doesnt even harm anyone or anything to fantasize about it. i thought that's what literotica was all about: a place to share your fantasies, no matter what they are. i'm sure there are plenty of readers looking at this link right now that probably feel for her but are afraid to post, for fear that they, too, might be seen as an outcast. i guess it comes down to freedom of speech, and you guys have just as much protection under the 5th amendment as she does so bash away, but i just think you should know you are not being fair at all. thats really all i got.


The freedom of speech is located in the 5th amendment? BWAH-HAHAHAHAHA! Try the 1st amendment, moron.

But it's ironic that you chose to mention the 5th amendment, which is the right to not have to testify against oneself in court, or self-incrimination. I'd say by asking about bestiality stories in particular, this person did incriminate his/herself.

Moreover, I stick to my previous statement- if you fantasize about sex with something that 1) is an actual animal that isn't even your own species and 2) that can't even give legal consent, you're fucking sick.

In closing, if you're going to rant about something here, please know what you're talking about, else you'll fast become one of Lit's many pariahs. Just a suggestion.
 
apexpark said:
i never said that i thought it was a serious no-no. i said here at lit its a serious no-no. i dont do it myself because im just not attracted to animals. but i dont have a problem with it as long as nothings getting hurt.


I didn't mean to misquote you; however, the REASON it's a big no-no at Lit is because animals cannot give consent. Now, they DO have non-consent stories, but between consenting adults, and in just about all of them, there is a little force and then the "victim" warms up to it. I've never seen any stories depicting a brutal, violent, actual rape in a story that doesn't polish over the reality of such an act.
 
Back
Top