Erotic Artists Critique

bluntforcemama

Aqua Vulva
Joined
Nov 11, 2000
Posts
30,225
Jennifer Janesko: When will her work actually start growing and show more variety? http://www.janesko.com/home.htm It becomes mundane after a while. She's very talented, but all her work tends to blend together and hold no interest for the viewer. What do you think?
 
Pinup art is neat but by its very nature doesn't grow in the traditional sense.
 
True, but I would think that the artist would become bored with the same productions over and over again. Why not spice it up a little?
 
It's the mercenary aspect that provokes it and then makes it freeze.

Olivia is a favorite of mine, but she's never gone all that far beyond imitating Vargas.

Giger's success killed his creativity. I can't tell the difference between his Necronomicon and something he produced yesterday.

I think diversity and progression is the sole property of the struggling (emotionally or monetarily) artist.
 
So you think that changing artists are trying to find their niche in order to be successful? Olivia's stuff does have thought-provoking material, though. What about the whole American Geisha series?
 
Myst said:
So you think that changing artists are trying to find their niche in order to be successful? Olivia's stuff does have thought-provoking material, though. What about the whole American Geisha series?


I liked the Geisha stuff, much like I appreciate all of her work (Julie Strain, yes!) and it is a minor progression in technique and subject. But she refuses to evolve in terms of theme or thought like a traditional artist. Not necessarily a bad thing, she's not poor by any stretch.


http://www.michael-parkes-gallery.com/olvia3.jpg
American Geisha


When I think of major progressions, I think of the big guns like Man Ray working with new or invented media and themes or Magritte becoming more realistic and less static or Picasso's separate periods. It was often said that every period was the dawn of a new affair.

Do you like Michael Parkes? He's a modern mercenary that I think keeps pushing, but I'm not an artist, so what the hell do I know...



http://www.artbrokerage.com/images/parkes/parkes_dusk.jpg
 
avatar.php


This reminds me of a Jackson Pollack.
 
Yes, I'm VERY familiar with Michael Parkes, I have several of his prints framed in my living room. As for Jackson Pollack (who was born in Wyoming, let me remind you) may be one of America's finest artists. I suspect he was one of the first American artists to be internationally recognized.
 
Marxist said:




When I think of major progressions, I think of the big guns like Man Ray working with new or invented media and themes or Magritte becoming more realistic and less static or Picasso's separate periods. It was often said that every period was the dawn of a new affair.



Yes, Picasso was known for his personification of influential biases by his mistresses, especially when there were times when the periods overlapped. Where they overlapped is the most interesting.
 
Ricky Carralero!

His Work Is Quite Like Sorayama In His Early Days?

I'm Not An Artwork Goddess Like Myst Or Anything, But I do Like A Few People Very Much.
 
Myst said:
Jennifer Janesko: When will her work actually start growing and show more variety? http://www.janesko.com/home.htm It becomes mundane after a while. She's very talented, but all her work tends to blend together and hold no interest for the viewer. What do you think?

There is no depth to her work. Nothing that can be viewed as subjective. What you see is what you get. There are no questions asked. You know it is a scintillating female, and there is nothing else. What's to critique? The style? Airbrushed female perfection isn't new. Put those women on a bike or as part of graffiti, then I'd call it art. The context is boring.
 
The Prohibited Book By

Luis Royo Is Fabulous!

I Have Posted My Other Favorites Before:)

Here Is Another. It Does It NO Justice At This Size!
 
Myst....about Pollack

Hi, I love the modernists and conceptualism as much as any artist with growth and learning in mind...so much can be caught by studying these great artists. Polack was a man in his own category and therefore very radical. However, he wasn't the first american artist to be known internationally....think of Impressionist Mary Cassat or Hudson River School artist Frederick Church, who was in his time considered the most famous artist in America and travelled the world.

Art history just happens to be my thing--as well as doing art.

I find the works that were questioned about by Janesko to be complete commercialism. There is no emotive content to her work and the air brushing---ugh! save that for the tank of a Harley in my opinion....

However there is a respect I feel that she has put forth the energy to do these works and make her own website.

Zane
 
Re: Myst....about Pollack

cyn1959 said:
Hi, I love the modernists and conceptualism as much as any artist with growth and learning in mind...so much can be caught by studying these great artists. Polack was a man in his own category and therefore very radical. However, he wasn't the first american artist to be known internationally....think of Impressionist Mary Cassat or Hudson River School artist Frederick Church, who was in his time considered the most famous artist in America and travelled the world.

Art history just happens to be my thing--as well as doing art.

I find the works that were questioned about by Janesko to be complete commercialism. There is no emotive content to her work and the air brushing---ugh! save that for the tank of a Harley in my opinion....

However there is a respect I feel that she has put forth the energy to do these works and make her own website.

Zane

Oh my. Can I be your intellectual love slave?
 
Rude Nasty Ass Bitch. Artist Royo

Thank you very much for the posting. The artist is new to me, and I clearly missed your earlier postings? Where may I find them, please.

I will try Google for the artist, whose work appears quite exciting to these eyes.

imouse
 
Back
Top