acitore_vuli
Scuttle Buttin'
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2002
- Posts
- 4,485
Seems lots of people are jumping on the Ernie Els bandwagon now that he's won the first two events on the PGA tour. Obviously he's playing great and has a huge headstart at winning the money title. Add the fact that Tiger's still rehabbing and probably won't play competitive golf until mid-late February and you have a strong argument for Ernie being the dominant golfer in 2003.
However, I think it's wishful thinking on the part of the golfing community that Ernie will be a legitimate threat to dethrone Tiger as the #1 player in the world or even win the money title in 2003. It would be great to see someone challenge Tiger day in and day out, but it's not realistic.
Since joining the PGA tour in '94 Els has won 12 events. Since joining the PGA in '96, Tiger has won 34 events. If you follow the stats, as I do, you can find staggering numbers that explain why Tiger is far and above the best player in the world and perhaps the best player the world has ever known.
In 2001 Els and Woods both played in 18 events with Els finishing in the top 10 seven times, while Woods finished in the top 10 thirteen times, including two majors.
One stat that has floored me for the last several years is the consecutive cuts stat. Davis Love III and Chris Riley are currently tied for second with 16 consecutive cuts made. Tiger is in first place with 96 cuts made.
It will be interesting to see how the 2003 season plays out, but I wouldn't put too much stock in Ernie winning many, if any more tournaments this year, since he averages 1.29 wins per year.
Tiger, on the other hand averages 4.86 per year.
I believe Tiger is the best golfer the world has known to date and will go on to break every major record there is, barring injury.
What are your thoughts?
However, I think it's wishful thinking on the part of the golfing community that Ernie will be a legitimate threat to dethrone Tiger as the #1 player in the world or even win the money title in 2003. It would be great to see someone challenge Tiger day in and day out, but it's not realistic.
Since joining the PGA tour in '94 Els has won 12 events. Since joining the PGA in '96, Tiger has won 34 events. If you follow the stats, as I do, you can find staggering numbers that explain why Tiger is far and above the best player in the world and perhaps the best player the world has ever known.
In 2001 Els and Woods both played in 18 events with Els finishing in the top 10 seven times, while Woods finished in the top 10 thirteen times, including two majors.
One stat that has floored me for the last several years is the consecutive cuts stat. Davis Love III and Chris Riley are currently tied for second with 16 consecutive cuts made. Tiger is in first place with 96 cuts made.
It will be interesting to see how the 2003 season plays out, but I wouldn't put too much stock in Ernie winning many, if any more tournaments this year, since he averages 1.29 wins per year.
Tiger, on the other hand averages 4.86 per year.
I believe Tiger is the best golfer the world has known to date and will go on to break every major record there is, barring injury.
What are your thoughts?