G
Guest
Guest
Hello all-
I just posted the end of a novel-length tale (the beginning is here: http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=467983) titled Sexual Immersion, in the mind-control section. This thread comes up in response to the early feedback I'm getting on the ending.
The story is thirty-six chapters, so it's a fairly long journey for anyone reading to the end. In voting, each section currently rates anywhere from a 4.92 - 4.79 (and that includes some jerk who consistently voted it a "1"). The story has some real admirers, some less than admirers, etc. as all stories do.
So far the responses to the ending are "More!" in some form or another. Some believe the tale got cut off too quickly, some just seem to want to keep reading, one thinks the ending is fine, but they'd love a sequel (that one is essentially where I feel the ending is).
My question/issue is in trying to get a feel for whether the story does, indeed, end in a "wrong" way, or whether it's more that readers are mostly greedy and just want more because they want more. I could look at the responses as, "Hey, it's great that the appetite is there", or, "Damn, maybe I blew the ending, even though it seems right to me".
Obviously it's impossible for anyone to give an opinion on the specifics without reading the entire tale. I do want to learn more for future projects, though. I think that some of the feedback suggests a lack of understanding about the time and energy that goes into writing a long story like that—one reader said something about how I can obviously crank this stuff out, not getting that it took three years to write and edit the tale, even if it did all get posted in a month's time.
Anyway, just wondering if other writers here have had a similar experience, and any advice on sifting through the feedback winds.
I just posted the end of a novel-length tale (the beginning is here: http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=467983) titled Sexual Immersion, in the mind-control section. This thread comes up in response to the early feedback I'm getting on the ending.
The story is thirty-six chapters, so it's a fairly long journey for anyone reading to the end. In voting, each section currently rates anywhere from a 4.92 - 4.79 (and that includes some jerk who consistently voted it a "1"). The story has some real admirers, some less than admirers, etc. as all stories do.
So far the responses to the ending are "More!" in some form or another. Some believe the tale got cut off too quickly, some just seem to want to keep reading, one thinks the ending is fine, but they'd love a sequel (that one is essentially where I feel the ending is).
My question/issue is in trying to get a feel for whether the story does, indeed, end in a "wrong" way, or whether it's more that readers are mostly greedy and just want more because they want more. I could look at the responses as, "Hey, it's great that the appetite is there", or, "Damn, maybe I blew the ending, even though it seems right to me".
Obviously it's impossible for anyone to give an opinion on the specifics without reading the entire tale. I do want to learn more for future projects, though. I think that some of the feedback suggests a lack of understanding about the time and energy that goes into writing a long story like that—one reader said something about how I can obviously crank this stuff out, not getting that it took three years to write and edit the tale, even if it did all get posted in a month's time.
Anyway, just wondering if other writers here have had a similar experience, and any advice on sifting through the feedback winds.