Employment

J

JAMESBJOHNSON

Guest
You cant cheat God, and before you know it we'll have full employment with no jobs. Its absurd, and proof of Paradox Rule. But folks are dolts.
 
You stand before us as a stark reminder as to the dangers of eating too much paste as a child.
 
Why do conservatives constantly talk about sucking cocks, assholes, and feces? What's wrong with you guys?

So I see you are still trying to suck yours too. How's that working out for you?

By the way, I'm not a conservative asshole.
 
So I see you are still trying to suck yours too. How's that working out for you?

By the way, I'm not a conservative asshole.


You're just really into talking about other guys' dicks?

Here you go, bro:


uncut2.jpg
 
Last edited:
You're just really into talking about other guys' dicks?

Here you go, bro:

No, I was just wondering when you will stop trying to suck yours?

Of course you haven't answered the question, just implied, 1) I'm a conservative and 2) I like talking about someones dick, neither of which I am.
 
To be fair to the OP, I think he is, inartfully, making a solid point: the official unemployment numbers are highly dubious. They only ever go down because the USG conveniently decides that you've "left the labor force" if you've been out of work longer than six months and are no longer hitting the pavement every day. On top of that, we're not even adding enough jobs to keep up with population growth--let alone recover the jobs lost--AND most of the jobs being added to the economy are part-time service jobs, which are sometimes exempt from paying state or federal minimum wage.

If you corrected for all that, we'd have an official unemployment rate in the double digits and an underemployment rate in the high double digits.

This is, of course, by design. A large number of unemployed people--say, large enough for there to be 3-5 people in line for any given job vacancy--means that employers can keep wages low and treat employees like shit, which means they can further divorce productivity from wages and increase their profits.
 
To be fair to the OP, I think he is, inartfully, making a solid point: the official unemployment numbers are highly dubious. They only ever go down because the USG conveniently decides that you've "left the labor force" if you've been out of work longer than six months and are no longer hitting the pavement every day. On top of that, we're not even adding enough jobs to keep up with population growth--let alone recover the jobs lost--AND most of the jobs being added to the economy are part-time service jobs, which are sometimes exempt from paying state or federal minimum wage.

If you corrected for all that, we'd have an official unemployment rate in the double digits and an underemployment rate in the high double digits.

This is, of course, by design. A large number of unemployed people--say, large enough for there to be 3-5 people in line for any given job vacancy--means that employers can keep wages low and treat employees like shit, which means they can further divorce productivity from wages and increase their profits.

Yep, you only count if you can collect unemployment pay. If you graduated high school or college, got outta prison, came back to work after cancer, got fired, left the military, if youre business went bankrupt, youre not counted.
 
To be fair to the OP, I think he is, inartfully, making a solid point: the official unemployment numbers are highly dubious. They only ever go down because the USG conveniently decides that you've "left the labor force" if you've been out of work longer than six months and are no longer hitting the pavement every day. On top of that, we're not even adding enough jobs to keep up with population growth--let alone recover the jobs lost--AND most of the jobs being added to the economy are part-time service jobs, which are sometimes exempt from paying state or federal minimum wage.

If you corrected for all that, we'd have an official unemployment rate in the double digits and an underemployment rate in the high double digits.

This is, of course, by design. A large number of unemployed people--say, large enough for there to be 3-5 people in line for any given job vacancy--means that employers can keep wages low and treat employees like shit, which means they can further divorce productivity from wages and increase their profits.

You're, sadly, making the argument the GOP wants you to make. Here let me give you an example in picture form.

politifact%2Fphotos%2FZero_on_Job_Creation.jpg


And if you replace 32 with 40 on this chart...well you see my point.

Jobs-vs-aca-votes.png
 
You're, sadly, making the argument the GOP wants you to make. Here let me give you an example in picture form.

politifact%2Fphotos%2FZero_on_Job_Creation.jpg


And if you replace 32 with 40 on this chart...well you see my point.

Jobs-vs-aca-votes.png

I am active in politics, I'm aware the the GOP isn't a good actor in this. What you're missing, however, is that President Obama, and the conservative wing of the Democratic Party to which he belongs, aren't better actors.

President Obama, not the Republicans, is the person who keeps putting Social Security cuts on the table. (The Republicans are aware the public knows their record on the issue and they can't do what Obama can. Unfortunately for both, the batshit insane half of the GOP caucus keeps accidentally saving the program by obstructing Obama's "liberal" agenda.)

President Obama, not the Republicans, appointed the most infamous teachers' union buster as Secretary of Education.

President Obama, not the Republicans, appointed the most infamous union buster--period--in the country to the position of Commerce Secretary.

President Obama, not the Republicans, insisted that what Wall Street did in the years leading up to the 2007-2009 market crash was "immoral but not illegal" and twisted the arms of every Democratic AG in the country to sign off on a slap on the wrist "settlement" with the banks behind closed doors in Chicago in an election year.

I could go on and on here. Bottom line, if you really pay attention to the issues, you'll realize the current leadership of the Democratic Party is just as anti-worker as the GOP leadership, they're just better about hiding/lying about it.
 
Most of your jobs are going to China and India.

All human beings performing jobs that can be automated by machines/robots/computers will be purged from their employment and forced into the following.

Much like in China, extremely large portions of the gross population will be forced into towering highrise slum apartment complexes where your claustrophobic and unsanitary living space is only 200-300 square feet. You will be forced to work 16-18 hours per day under excruciating conditions in a factory which is attached to the back of your slum apartment facility where you get paid slave-like wages.

There are huge financial rewards for agreeing to be sterilized or have an abortion.

Only the very wealthy will be able to live in their own houses, drive vehicles, own private property, retain civil rights, and move about freely.

This is all part of the United Nations eugenics/deindustrialization/agenda 21.

Alex Jones has been talking about this for years.
 
Last edited:
I am active in politics, I'm aware the the GOP isn't a good actor in this. What you're missing, however, is that President Obama, and the conservative wing of the Democratic Party to which he belongs, aren't better actors.

Dude....nothing will convince DanC that Obama and the DNC aren't the picture perfect example of political altruism any more than you could convince the tea party cock suckers on here that Obama isn't Marx incarnate.

In the blue corner you have.

Mercury14
Anything named Sean/Shawn/Shaun
SDG (RobDownSouth)
RacistSexistDoucheGuzzler (Irezumi)
RJthoughts
LT (this one is special, don't touch his ears)


There are a few others that are close but they are usually fairly sane and reasonable if you present an argument that is backed up with data/experts/studies etc. But the fuckers on this list don't give a shit about that....it's bat shit lefty or GTFO.

Example...Sean(not renauldo) call's people scum bags for having a job and working to pay them bills. Bat shit mother fuckers.

In the red corner ya got

JAMESBRACIST
Vettebiggot
KoalaBro
BusyBootay(Pablo Plunder this week)
Miles (not around so much)
VatAss
RetardRuse

There are a few other crazies/trolls....but this is the core group of "I hate big gubbmint telling me what to do unless it's to ban gays, ban porn, ban drugs, ban fun, ban rock n' roll, ban education, ban women, ban niggers and build a fence to keep the fuckin' wet backs out.

Obama death panels, Obama gestapo, Obama is hitler, Obama is marx, Obama is...

Example.....sequester and austerity are what america needs, it's the only way to prosperity, unless Obama is doing it. Then it's an evil conspiracy to subjugate the white man. Yep...that actually happened, like 40 times.

You get the picture.

Have fun, the GB is a magical place of assholery...I highly suggest you never take anything here seriously for the sake of your mental and physical health. Good luck.....and godspeed.

tumblr_lick9ifBEn1qi9ecjo1_400.gif
 
Last edited:
Dude....nothing will convince DanC that Obama and the DNC aren't the picture perfect example of political altruism any more than you could convince the tea party cock suckers on here that Obama isn't Marx incarnate.

In the blue corner you have.

Mercury14
Anything named Sean/Shawn/Shaun
SDG (RobDownSouth)
RacistSexistDoucheGuzzler (Irezumi)
RJthoughts
LT (this one is special, don't touch his ears)


There are a few others that are close but they are usually fairly sane and reasonable if you present an argument that is backed up with data/experts/studies etc. But the fuckers on this list don't give a shit about that....it's bat shit lefty or GTFO.

Example...Sean(not renauldo) call's people scum bags for having a job and working to pay them bills. Bat shit mother fuckers.

In the red corner ya got

JAMESBRACIST
Vettebiggot
KoalaBro
BusyBootay(Pablo Plunder this week)
Miles (not around so much)
VatAss
RetardRuse

There are a few other crazies/trolls....but this is the core group of "I hate big gubbmint telling me what to do unless it's to ban gays, ban porn, ban drugs, ban fun, ban rock n' roll, ban education, ban women, ban niggers and build a fence to keep the fuckin' wet backs out.

Obama death panels, Obama gestapo, Obama is hitler, Obama is marx, Obama is...

Example.....sequester and austerity are what america needs, it's the only way to prosperity, unless Obama is doing it. Then it's an evil conspiracy to subjugate the white man. Yep...that actually happened, like 40 times.

You get the picture.

Have fun, the GB is a magical place of assholery...I highly suggest you never take anything here seriously for the sake of your mental and physical health. Good luck.....and godspeed.

tumblr_lick9ifBEn1qi9ecjo1_400.gif

I'm in the red corner?:confused:
 
I am active in politics, I'm aware the the GOP isn't a good actor in this. What you're missing, however, is that President Obama, and the conservative wing of the Democratic Party to which he belongs, aren't better actors.

President Obama, not the Republicans, is the person who keeps putting Social Security cuts on the table. (The Republicans are aware the public knows their record on the issue and they can't do what Obama can. Unfortunately for both, the batshit insane half of the GOP caucus keeps accidentally saving the program by obstructing Obama's "liberal" agenda.)

President Obama, not the Republicans, appointed the most infamous teachers' union buster as Secretary of Education.

President Obama, not the Republicans, appointed the most infamous union buster--period--in the country to the position of Commerce Secretary.

President Obama, not the Republicans, insisted that what Wall Street did in the years leading up to the 2007-2009 market crash was "immoral but not illegal" and twisted the arms of every Democratic AG in the country to sign off on a slap on the wrist "settlement" with the banks behind closed doors in Chicago in an election year.

I could go on and on here. Bottom line, if you really pay attention to the issues, you'll realize the current leadership of the Democratic Party is just as anti-worker as the GOP leadership, they're just better about hiding/lying about it.

I know it's soooooooooooooo anti-worker, right! Remember all the union busting laws passed by all those D govs? Oh wait? You mean ALL the union busting laws were passed by guys like Scott Walker, Mitch Daniels, and Rick Snyder are Republitards! No way that can't be possible because you "active in politics". Look I'm active in your mom but I don't go around bragging about it.

Now don't republitards claim to love freedom but have no problem getting big government into education?

Really Obama got EVERY AG to sign off on his deal? Agreed to between the nation's five largest banks and attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia, the deal settles charges of foreclosure processing abuses dating back to 2008. Again you're active in politics so you know this, right?

Sure the commerce secretary may be a union busting millionaire but didn't the GOP nominate the same person for President? Also, she's never been called "evil" unlike someone else.

I could go on destroying you but I'd rather not waste the rest of my time. Instead I'm just going to post a graphic to sum up how poorly the GOP is thinking about doing to jobs.

chart-20111209-gop-job-elimination.png
 
I know it's soooooooooooooo anti-worker, right! Remember all the union busting laws passed by all those D govs? Oh wait? You mean ALL the union busting laws were passed by guys like Scott Walker, Mitch Daniels, and Rick Snyder are Republitards! No way that can't be possible because you "active in politics". Look I'm active in your mom but I don't go around bragging about it.

Now don't republitards claim to love freedom but have no problem getting big government into education?

Really Obama got EVERY AG to sign off on his deal? Agreed to between the nation's five largest banks and attorneys general from 49 states and the District of Columbia, the deal settles charges of foreclosure processing abuses dating back to 2008. Again you're active in politics so you know this, right?

Sure the commerce secretary may be a union busting millionaire but didn't the GOP nominate the same person for President? Also, she's never been called "evil" unlike someone else.

I could go on destroying you but I'd rather not waste the rest of my time. Instead I'm just going to post a graphic to sum up how poorly the GOP is thinking about doing to jobs.

chart-20111209-gop-job-elimination.png

Why are the complete fucking morons always so loud and cocksure? Pro-tip: If your argument is comprised completely of pasting links and launching into ad hominem attacks, the only person you are "destroying" is any person who may have referred to you as a critical thinker or socially adept.

Unlike you, I actually get paid for political work, so I think my time is infinitely more valuable than yours, but allow me to try to educate you. I believe in public service.

1) If you think that the Republican governors are the only people who are actively anti-union, you're wildly mistaken. See: Rahm Emanuel and the Chicago teacher's strike, Jerry Brown and the United Farm Workers, the current administration's record on things like EFCA, minimum wage, etc during the two years they had supermajorities in both houses of Congress.

2) The Democratic AGs--I didn't say every AG in the country, that a strawman, but it's to be expected from "special" people like you--were strong-armed into signing off on the shitty foreclosure deal, which rushed into making a settlement with actors who have violated the terms of every single other settlement they've ever engaged in without having all the facts. The terms of the settlement--provided the banks actually honor it, which they have a record of not doing--basically amounts to counting things they were doing anyway as "penalties" and fining them the equivalent of a rounding error on the profits they made off the crimes. The settlement, in other words, was yet another backdoor bailout for the banks. If you read direct sources on the deal rather than skimming HuffPo articles, you might know this.

3) Believe it or not, the fact that one side of a two party system is transparently on the wrong side of an issue does not mean the other side is on the right side of the issue. Both sides in a debate can actually be arguing in bad faith.

4) Mitt Romney being an asshole is in no way germane to the argument you are trying to put forward, unless your argument is basically "the other side is way worse," which isn't even true on most issues. (If you recall, Obama explicitly said that he and Romney had the exact same position on "entitlements" during the debates.)

5) My mom is a college graduate and professional. She wouldn't sleep with you, no woman with options would, given the way you handle argument.
 
Also, plenty of people think Pritzker is evil. Ask anyone who works in the hotel industry or the Chicago public school system.
 
Back
Top