Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She’s very prettyHappy Saturn-Day, take a look at those rings!
https://hwcdn.voyeurweb.com/albums/29959/large/2084965-nipple-rings.jpg?key=8cd69526f79f9e1aa338b01960f767db2bcb08c1
This seems to have become Emily’s posiTITTY thread.
Dm
That particular one was allegedly a little skew.What's so bad about Dicks?
Well, he proved a villain. That's what his officially authorized biographer W. Shakespeare wrote. At least the winter of his discontent was made glorious summer by the nudie pics of Bamagan.What's so bad about Dicks?
Not when played by Peter Cook.That particular one was allegedly a little skew.
So far, the pics have provided naughty bits as parts of entire humans (unless they're AI-generated), so one could at least (claim to) relate to the models as people. Surely, for those folks who are visually pleased by unclad male anatomy, the same approach could be followed, and thus be more than the sort of sexting-limited imagery that fits the usual usage of the term 'dick pics.' Of course, if a waving wang would not be allowed by the site, maybe buns seen from behind would have to suffice.They DO seem to bring about a lot of positive feelings. They do for me.
Let's just everyone steer clear of dick picks, OK? The mood might take an unfortunate turn.
Thor's have made an appearance.So far, the pics have provided naughty bits as parts of entire humans (unless they're AI-generated), so one could at least (claim to) relate to the models as people. Surely, for those folks who are visually pleased by unclad male anatomy, the same approach could be followed, and thus be more than the sort of sexting-limited imagery that fits the usual usage of the term 'dick pics.' Of course, if a waving wang would not be allowed by the site, maybe buns seen from behind would have to suffice.
Hmm. There have been both boobies and booties. So maybe posterior-i-titty thread.This seems to have become Emily’s posiTITTY thread.
Em
Given this has become a photo thread, I don’t see why the male physique should not be included.So far, the pics have provided naughty bits as parts of entire humans (unless they're AI-generated), so one could at least (claim to) relate to the models as people. Surely, for those folks who are visually pleased by unclad male anatomy, the same approach could be followed, and thus be more than the sort of sexting-limited imagery that fits the usual usage of the term 'dick pics.' Of course, if a waving wang would not be allowed by the site, maybe buns seen from behind would have to suffice.
Both homo and equoerotic at the same timehttps://www.interviewmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/HERO-scaled.jpg
Jeremy Irons will always live rent-free in the small bit of me that still likes staring at men.
Wow, look at the definition. If you ever want to know if someone has low bodyfat, look for those serratus muscles next to the lats.https://www.interviewmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/HERO-scaled.jpg
Jeremy Irons will always live rent-free in the small bit of me that still likes staring at men.
Neigh!Both homo and equoerotic at the same time.
Em
https://www.interviewmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/HERO-scaled.jpg
Jeremy Irons will always live rent-free in the small bit of me that still likes staring at men.
I don’t typically go for a guy’s looks, but every rule has its exceptions:
https://res.heraldm.com/content/image/2021/01/22/20210122000472_0.jpg