IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 73,859
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Norfolk Southern helped convince government officials to repeal brake rules — and corporate lobbyists watered down hazmat safety regs.
Amid the lobbying blitz against stronger transportation safety regulations, Norfolk Southern paid executives millions and spent billions on stock buybacks — all while the company shed thousands of employees despite warnings that understaffing is intensifying safety risks. Norfolk Southern officials also fought off a shareholder initiative that could have required company executives to “assess, review, and mitigate risks of hazardous material transportation.”
Case in point...see the tweet above claiming the chemicals were classified as non-hazardous....were they? Everything I have seen shows they were properly classified. And because they were...first responders were able to handle the spill effectively.So many people complaining...thinking issues are new. They aren't. Social media just spreads details...or potential details...quicker. But this is what Americans vote for.
That was in error. The real story is that NS fought (and won) against regulations that would've kept the train from getting this close to residences. (See my second source)Case in point...see the tweet above claiming the chemicals were classified as non-hazardous....were they? Everything I have seen shows they were properly classified. And because they were...first responders were able to handle the spill effectively.
Lol...why is that a "story"? Ok...let's play...what alternative transportation do you suggest? Shall we create dedicated rail lines? So how do you propose to get a product from Point A to Point B without traveling through a town? What has a higher accident rate...rail...or semi? Does the probability of a accident increase or decrease on transfer rate? Why were rail lines built where they are?That was in error. The real story is that NS fought (and won) against regulations that would've kept the train from getting this close to residences. (See my second source)
Because a train derailed.Lol...why is that a "story"?
I'm not suggesting anythingOk...let's play...what alternative transportation do you suggest? Shall we create dedicated rail lines? So how do you propose to get a product from Point A to Point B without traveling through a town? What has a higher accident rate...rail...or semi? Does the probability of a accident increase or decrease on transfer rate? Why were rail lines built where they are?
I wasn't complaining, actually. Just discussing. A good solution would be to have engineers of railroads get together and analyze the fault of the rails as well as proximity to residences and add new railways if able and new regulations where required.This is the issue I have with my fellow Democrats...they are reactive. Not proactive. They complain...but have no solutions.
We don't have this information because the investigation is still underway.My question...why did the train derail? Were they traveling too fast? Was a bearing out on the car? Was there actual infrastructure issues? Answering these questions are way more important than trying to propose a whole new rail system avoiding habitation...whi h east of the Mississippi is impossible.
Preliminary reports suggest a bearing went out. I know that the RR's have heat sensing monitoring stations at regular intervals on their track, especially on the mainlines, which this is. So, if a bearing is the cause was the monitor station faulty? Had it been tampered with? Or was this just a catastrophic failure? The NTSB report will cover it.Lol...why is that a "story"? Ok...let's play...what alternative transportation do you suggest? Shall we create dedicated rail lines? So how do you propose to get a product from Point A to Point B without traveling through a town? What has a higher accident rate...rail...or semi? Does the probability of a accident increase or decrease on transfer rate? Why were rail lines built where they are?
This is the issue I have with my fellow Democrats...they are reactive. Not proactive. They complain...but have no solutions.
My question...why did the train derail? Were they traveling too fast? Was a bearing out on the car? Was there actual infrastructure issues? Answering these questions are way more important than trying to propose a whole new rail system avoiding habitation...whi h east of the Mississippi is impossible.
what has he specifically done or not done to warrant this accusation?Buttplug is uniquely incompetent for the position he's in,
I don't think it's about what he's done. It's about who his is and what he represents to Ishy. Buttigieg is a successful, intelligent, family man. And he's gay, and in a gay marriage. Hence, Assmeal's bigotry.what has he specifically done or not done to warrant this accusation?
i agree. ish admires him from behind closet doors.I don't think it's about what he's done. It's about who his is and what he represents to Ishy. Buttigieg is a successful, intelligent, family man. And he's gay, and in a gay marriage. Hence, Assmeal's bigotry.
I would think the fire department had MSDSs on file,Case in point...see the tweet above claiming the chemicals were classified as non-hazardous....were they? Everything I have seen shows they were properly classified. And because they were...first responders were able to handle the spill effectively.
Yeah, and they’ve had a whole eight months of construction season and loads of available labor to get all that done.they got 1.9 trillion to fix the railroads.
and the airports, and the cities.
I knew they wouldn't do shit.
in a perfect world, yes you would.I would think
If Norfolk Southern does not do right by the people of that town (and just basically everyone affected by this seemingly preventable accident) a whole lotta ugly is gonna happen really fast.