Dum Liberal Cocksuckers

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/tea-party-science-98488.html?hp=r3

TEA PARTIERS ARE SMARTER.


The liberal looks at a pot of boiling water and thinks, lemme dunk my hand in there and see if its hot; I don't wanna be judgmental.

The Tea Partier says, FUCK THAT!

 

[dan_c00000]

Ouch.

And 100 is considered average. Which means most of the "very conservative" are, for lack of a better phrase, fucking dumb.

 

[doctor_insanus]

Followed the link in the article, found this little nugget:

"In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending."

Oh... and it's also spelled "dumb."

 

[dan_c00000]

Followed the link in the article, found this little nugget:

"In this dataset, I found that there is a small correlation (r = -0.05, p = 0.03) between the science comprehension measure and a left-right political outlook measure, Conservrepub, which aggregates liberal-conservative ideology and party self-identification. The sign of the correlation indicates that science comprehension decreases as political outlooks move in the rightward direction--i.e., the more "liberal" and "Democrat," the more science comprehending."

Oh... and it's also spelled "dumb."

Don't you love it when these old, racist fucks even read the whole article.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I hope I ruined your day.

 

[neci]

i put noodles into my boiling water.

 

[Liar]

i put noodles into my boiling water.

Communist.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Communist.

Don't believe her, libs lie about everything.

 

[Que]

Ouch.

And 100 is considered average. Which means most of the "very conservative" are, for lack of a better phrase, fucking dumb.

So a chart consisting of highly average people with a range in either side of +/- 6 points no reference to sample size is conclusive in your mind?

Since I'm sure you figure you're a genius your IQ is 34 points or more above the top of your little graph right? Nearly 6 times the difference between the high and average in your graph.

In your experience can you tell me some of the differences you've observed between people with an IQ of say 99 and 101?

I'm sure the equally bright person that made that lovely graph was scientific enough to understand the concept of significant figures. So since he elected to display to decimal places I guess we can assume that the sample size was somewhere around a hundred thousand people?

Since you like the idea of graphing intelligence how would you feel about, oh...I don't know....say...a bell curve as it relates to intelligence in race or would that just be silly?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

This is a simple battle between the producers of wealth and the consumers of wealth. Whether or not the Constitutional proscriptions against government overreach will be enforced or breached by an ever growing body of non-productive consumers of wealth. Consumers recruited, encouraged, and enabled, by the first Marxist President and his pro-Marxist Democrat Party, together bent on creating a bigger demand for the redistribution of private wealth and property than the private sector itself can protect at the ballot box.

And so it begins, the attempted murder of the civil society along with its notions of government of the people, by the people, and for the people, and in its place an attempt to establish a post constitutional republic governed by the administrative state centered in Washington DC.

Its a trial we gotta go thru to repudiate the libs and Marxists. The USSR did it, Europe is doing it, and we're no smarter.

 

[sr71plt]

Hey, did everyone note how Mitch McConnell backed up his dedication to keeping government costs down and got bought off on his principals in the government shutdown by attaching a $2 billion dam project for his state as a rider on the government-back-in-business bill?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

And they will be repudiated. If not by us, but by the law of diminishing return.

They always are. Every lib ploy is a Ponzi scheme to fuck the folks outta their money.

 

[sr71plt]

I said, JBJ, did you notice how a $2 billion dam project in Mitch McConnell's state got added as a rider to the government reopening bill? You didn't seem to catch that.

 

[unregistered]

 

[miles]

Did you hear the clown President today? Notice how he thanked the stressed government workers who tolerated the shutdown, what about the long suffering private sector citizen who shoulders the costs of this bloated government burden? What about the hardships placed on them?

They don't belong to the government employees' union.

 

[unregistered]

 

[sr71plt]

Yes, but I don't think that JBJ has absorbed that.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Hey Seymour, you slumming at the GB? They'll eat you alive here, boy.

I already posted something to that effect. I think I said they spent two weeks twisting Obama's dick for more pork.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Obviously, he as some difficulty understanding United States.

Oh! Principal Skinner is the smartest poster ever to come to LIT. He'll get his ass handed to him here.