TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
Does black racial extinction matter? 
Does white racial extinction matter?
- Thread starter Wilson23
- Start date
In the terms laid out in the OP, with no surviving purebreds free of one drop from outside their "race"?Does black racial extinction matter?
Probably not.
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
So if some group thinks there is no scientific motivation to preserving a specific race group, they have your blessing.
Interesting.
Interesting.
Bear in mind that "preserving" a "race group" here means nothing but keeping its members from breeding outside it.
BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 9,757
When you say “black” who are you talking about? African Americans or Native Africans? Two different populations with two different cultures.Does black racial extinction matter?
Actually, in the case of Native Africans, we’re talking dozens of cultures. Sudan is very different from Mali, which is also different from South Africa.
Blackness like whiteness is a European colonial construct.
It's about "racial" extinction, not cultural. We're talking blood and genomes. Forget for the moment we're human and think in terms of dog breeds -- dogs have no culture, but their breeds are distinguishable.
BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 9,757
Eugenics is garbage. There are no pure bloodlines. Some populations merely have higher frequencies of certain genes. Northern Europeans have a mutation that help them digest dairy. Sub-Saharan Africans are more resistant to malaria, but also more likely to get sickle-cell anemia.
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
And that was an effort to destroy the Scots as a nation by putting English blood into their gene pool. Wouldn't have worked.
Also, there never was any noble right of "jus primae noctis." Of course feudal lords could do what they pleased with their peasant girls -- there was no authority to whom the girls could complain -- but it was never a matter of legal right.
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
Glad to see you proudly asserting you got the proper pathway for eugenics figured out. Always nice to see people showing who they really are.
YDB95
Hopeless Romantic!
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 14,957
Understanding it is not the same as advocating for it.
My point was that it WOULDN'T work. You couldn't turn the Scots English that way. Scotland is full of people of English ancestry who are as Scottish as Robert Bruce.
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
I see the point is so far over your head it may as well be in orbit.
Not if the point has anything to do with races, it isn't. There is not really any "white genocide" or "great replacement" going on. No one is trying to "breed them out."
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/The_Great_Replacement
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/White_genocide
Last edited:
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
You're advocating for indifference to the elimination of racial groups.
I see zero difference between you and some person in a white pointed hood "just asking" if extinction of certain racial groups is really something to be worried about.
Oh, well, you fail to see that difference only because you are an idiot, you see.
TastySuckToy
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
- Posts
- 3,761
You're right. The white pointed hood individual is at least more honest about their position.
The whitehood would approach the perceived problem with trees and ropes. I'm favoring a hands-off, libertarian approach to their hurryings and their scurryings and their marryings and their buryings and their natural selections (Joyce or Yeats, I'm not sure which -- somebody Irish, anyway). If in another century that means no pureblood whites are left anywhere, so what? It's SAVING the "white race" which would require some positive effort.
Last edited:
briancamdudetenger2018
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2023
- Posts
- 2,540
WNs have a slogan called the 14 words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children."
Now, this is based on the faulty assumption that any nonwhite (or not-pure-white) descendants whites may have are NOT of "our people." If your daughter marries a n****r, their children are your posterity, same as if the father were white.
Now, this is based on the faulty assumption that any nonwhite (or not-pure-white) descendants whites may have are NOT of "our people." If your daughter marries a n****r, their children are your posterity, same as if the father were white.
I once saw a WN cartoon showing three Jews, drawn as humanoid rats, discussing the NAACP's "Plan B" -- full equality for gorillas, including marriage to white women.
That is a distinctly American twist on antisemitic CTs: The Jews were behind the black civil rights movement, because they want to encourage race-mixing, because a mixed-race population is stupider than a white population, and therefore easier for the Jews to control.
That is a distinctly American twist on antisemitic CTs: The Jews were behind the black civil rights movement, because they want to encourage race-mixing, because a mixed-race population is stupider than a white population, and therefore easier for the Jews to control.
It seems slightly archaic even to discuss all this stuff now -- but there was a time, and not so very long ago, when preserving the racial purity of white bloodlines was considered important enough that interracial marriage was illegal in many American states. And even now, many whites view it as somewhat . . . indecent.
Similar threads
