Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

[Marxist]

I know Todd does. Cheyenne is only just bringing them up for discusssion (right). Sin. is drunk and thinks he wrote the articles he posts. Ishmael is just lonely and mad that he got stuck with a camel-jockey name.


P.S.--Uncle Bill does write his own, but he could copy and paste his old ones and no one would know the difference.

 

[bluespoke]

I know Todd does. Cheyenne is only just bringing them up for discusssion (right). Sin. is drunk and thinks he wrote the articles he posts. Ishmael is just lonely and mad that he got stuck with a camel-jockey name.


P.S.--Uncle Bill does write his own, but he could copy and paste his old ones and no one would know the difference.

It's irrelevant whether they believe them or not. They are fodder for debate.

Debate the issues, ignore the thread, it's your choice.

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

It's irrelevant whether they believe them or not. They are fodder for debate.

Debate the issues, ignore the thread, it's your choice.

Debate whether or not Arafat is a _________based on zero evidence? No thanks.

You're just mad I didn't mention you, bluspoke.

 

[Cheyenne]

I'd hate to think that you actually believe all the original stuff you post to the bb, Marxist. Aren't you often just trying to stir things up? Like with this thread, perhaps?

 

[Marxist]

I'd hate to think that you actually believe all the original stuff you post to the bb, Marxist. Aren't you often just trying to stir things up? Like with this thread, perhaps?

What have I posted that's so unbelievable? Anything "gross" is obviously in jest or fun. Sort of like this thread.

 

[bluespoke]

Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

Debate whether or not Arafat is a _________based on zero evidence? No thanks.

You're just mad I didn't mention you, bluspoke.

Debate the whole thread not just one part. If that part concerns you so much do some research, if not do the other thing I suggested, ignore the thread.

Not mentioning me is a blessing, nothing to get mad about.

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

Debate the whole thread not just one part. If that part concerns you so much do some research, if not do the other thing I suggested, ignore the thread.

It only takes one assertion that's unbelievable and unsubstantiated to ruin any argument.

 

[Cheyenne]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

It only takes one assertion that's unbelievable and unsubstantiated to ruin any argument.

Kind of like the one that says all white men hate Oprah?

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

Kind of like the one that says all white men hate Oprah?

Yes. Much like that. If I'd said that.











p.s.--The key word is all. Reading is fundamental, y'know.

 

[RawHumor]

Now you two break it up.

Marxist, do I have to send you to KM's house for discipline again?

 

[Marxist]

Now you two break it up.

Marxist, do I have to send you to KM's house for discipline again?

My ass is still sore RH.



Yes.

 

[Cheyenne]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

Yes. Much like that. If I'd said that.



p.s.--The key word is all. Reading is fundamental, y'know.

So you said American white men. Still wrong, as many of them told you on your thread. So would that qualify as "one assertion that's unbelievable and unsubstantiated to ruin any argument?"
I don't think so. The rest of your comments about Oprah had at least some merit, even if you were wrong on that one point about American white men hating her.

 

[RawHumor]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

So you said American white men. Still wrong, as many of them told you on your thread. So would that qualify as "one assertion that's unbelievable and unsubstantiated to ruin any argument?"
I don't think so. The rest of your comments about Oprah had at least some merit, even if you were wrong on that one point about American while men hating her.

Cheyenne, I don't wanna spank you, but... okay, I DO wanna spank you... where was I? Oh yeah!

I actually agreed with him about Oprah... at least I would think that most white men in a America should dislike her (hate is too strong of a word) - except maybe the anti-meat crowd.

Hey, weren't you going to send me a pic?

 

[p_p_man]

I seem to be the only one who voted that they are pulling our collective leg...

It's just that I can't believe anyone would believe much of the drivel that's cut and pasted by the Right Wing unless they were joking...

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

So you said American white men. Still wrong, as many of them told you on your thread. So would that qualify as "one assertion that's unbelievable and unsubstantiated to ruin any argument?"
I don't think so. The rest of your comments about Oprah had at least some merit, even if you were wrong on that one point about American while men hating her.

Cheyenne, you're literal as hell and I love you.



That doesn't mean you have to worry about me showing up on your doorstep with flowers and candy any time soon. I know a great burden has been relieved from your shoulders.



BTW--I think the Texas trial of Oprah on "food slander" shows the general contempt that she's held in.

 

[Cheyenne]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Past

BTW--I think the Texas trial of Oprah on "food slander" shows the general contempt that she's held in.

That says more about Texas than the general population of white American males.

I believe she won that trial, too.

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and

I believe she won that trial, too.

She did.





edited to add: That's where she found Dr. Phil as well. Man, that woman's an opportunist.

 

[RawHumor]

I'm sorry

What was this thread about again?

 

[Dillinger]

I believe you need more choices to your poll Marxist.

And I believe I need to know who you include in the label "right wing" - unless you just mean the handful of people you initially mentioned.

I believe that some of them very much believe what they post and what they cut&paste post. I believe that some of them sometimes bring things up just to see the reaction they get. I believe that some of them bring things up because they think there is some truth to it but not sure about the entire truth and are interested in discussion. I believe some of them are assholes.

I happen to believe exactly the same thing about the Lit "left wing" - if there is indeed a "left wing" anymore than there is a "right wing."

Again I believe I would need to have you tell me who is in the "left wing" so I can have something to compare the "right wing" against.

While you're at it. I would find it very useful if you can define for me who the liberals are - and if they're the same as the left wing, or maybe some of them just overlap. And who the libertarians are and if they're the same as the right wing or if some of them over lap.

And please do let us know what other categories there are and who falls into them.

Or, at least, let me know which category or categories I fall into so that everyone can take my comments with the proper grain of salt and through the filter of the appropriately applied label.

 

[Marxist]

I believe you need more choices to your poll Marxist.

And I believe I need to know who you include in the label "right wing" - unless you just mean the handful of people you initially mentioned.

I believe that some of them very much believe what they post and what they cut&paste post. I believe that some of them sometimes bring things up just to see the reaction they get. I believe that some of them bring things up because they think there is some truth to it but not sure about the entire truth and are interested in discussion. I believe some of them are assholes.

I happen to believe exactly the same thing about the Lit "left wing" - if there is indeed a "left wing" anymore than there is a "right wing."

Again I believe I would need to have you tell me who is in the "left wing" so I can have something to compare the "right wing" against.

While you're at it. I would find it very useful if you can define for me who the liberals are - and if they're the same as the left wing, or maybe some of them just overlap. And who the libertarians are and if they're the same as the right wing or if some of them over lap.

And please do let us know what other categories there are and who falls into them.

Or, at least, let me know which category or categories I fall into so that everyone can take my comments with the proper grain of salt and through the filter of the appropriately applied label.

That settles it Dill, I'm cutting your meds. back to half.

 

[Dillinger]

*lol* That might help a bit... but, if I can make a suggestion, you might want to double my dose of a few of them...

Results may vary.

 

[Problem Child]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

p.s.--The key word is all. Reading is fundamental, y'know.

And that reminds me of that wise old saying...


'What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is.'

Dan Quayle

 

[clit_licker30]

Yes, Rush said it was OK.

 

[Dixon Carter Lee]

Debate the whole thread not just one part. If that part concerns you so much do some research, if not do the other thing I suggested, ignore the thread.

The old "ignore me" comment is annoying. A cut and paste loony is free to give his opinion, and so is Marxist, and if his opinion is that the Control-V Freak is using the same part of his brain the rest of use to hold farts inside while riding in elevators, then rant away.

And if you don't like it, ignore him.

 

[Marxist]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does The Right Wing Of Lit. Actually Believe Their Copy and Pastes?

And that reminds me of that wise old saying...


'What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is.'

Dan Quayle

Dan Quayle did more for the UNCF in that one moment than a Lou Rawls telethon.