Does anyone else remember this story?

[emmataytay]

abc

.........

 

[sr71plt]

A boy? A voyeur to sex? Masturbating? It shouldn't be on Literotica that you read it.

 

[Catchalot]

Wait, the word boy is now prohibited? How about girl, is that prohibited too?

Last I knew, a boyfriend could be any age, I could hang out with the boys (I'm 49) My dad calls me his oldest boy, and the list goes on . . . .

 

[sr71plt]

Wait, the word boy is now prohibited? How about girl, is that prohibited too?

Last I knew, a boyfriend could be any age, I could hang out with the boys (I'm 49) My dad calls me his oldest boy, and the list goes on . . . .

My guess is that you didn't read the OP (since deleted). Even if the story itself specified the character was over 18, this clearly was an underage story (from the description).

And if you didn't read the OP, aren't you making some sweeping assumptions here? Or maybe you're disappointed you didn't get to read an underage incest story?

 

[Catchalot]

I read it, and I stand by my post.

The word "Boy" doesn't mean under 18, so get over yourself.

 

[lovecraft68]

I read it, and I stand by my post.

The word "Boy" doesn't mean under 18, so get over yourself.

My wife call my son in law "A nice boy" he's 25

I refer to him as a good kid cause to me he is one.

If there is a sweeping generalization here its on part of the site.

 

[Catchalot]

The thing is, we're not even talking about a story, we're talking about a poster's description of a story. By defending the use of a word, I'm now into underage sex by SR's way of thinking.

The guy is way out of line.

 

[sr71plt]

Did you bother to read my response to the OP? The description of the story indicated that the Web site wouldn't purposely post it. That was my response--what the Web site probably wouldn't do so if the story bore out that description. (it gave a scenario that you'd really have to strettttch your believability to make into an all-adult situation, and it specified the character was a boy--without giving an age. Don't be stupid about this.) I didn't give a personal preference about it at all.

And then you got all smart mouthed.

You probably don't see any significance to the OP deleting the post either, rather than asserting that the character had been specified to be an adult.

This isn't about my personal preferences. I don't get the vapors about 15-year-olds engaging in sex. It's about the Web site's rules.

My goodness the vultures are out today.

 

[Catchalot]

Ah, does itty bitty Pilot feel violated, because I disagreed with him, poor baby Go open another box of wine and chill out, it ain't no skin off your four inches bro.

 

[sr71plt]

Well, no, I don't. It seems obvious that you're the one who wants to fight and be a real asshole about it. Now you can do it with yourself(or maybe you and Lovecraft68 will enjoy yammering with each other.)

All I did was question whether a story described as underage could be found here. The OP apparently got the point. He/she erased the description rather than further clarifying the description as not underage. Apparently you don't understand the significance of that and want to fight me about a Web site rule. How irrelevant and juvenile is that? You've even reverted to babytalk.

 

[lovecraft68]

Well, no, I don't. It seems obvious that you're the one who wants to fight and be a real asshole about it. Now you can do it with yourself(or maybe you and Lovecraft68 will enjoy yammering with each other.)

All I did was question whether a story described as underage could be found here. The OP apparently got the point. He/she erased the description rather than further clarifying the description as not underage. Apparently you don't understand the significance of that and want to fight me about a Web site rule. How irrelevant and juvenile is that? You've even reverted to babytalk.

You're sadly mistaken if you think that an underage story could not have been found here.

There is no real screening process and the only way an underage story gets pulled is if someone finds it and feels like reporting it.

So I don't think its accurate to say the story could not have been read here.

Should not you can say, but it certainly could have been here.

 

[Catchalot]

You called me a vulture because I disagreed with you.

Bobby is twenty-four, and for his mother's 45th birthday he came home for a week to celebrate it with his parents. He found dirty home movies while looking for his old Topgun video cassette. He heard them coming down the hall, so he hid in the closet.

Dad had bought Mom some sexy new lingerie, and she couldn't wait to get fucked in it. Bobby watched from the closet, but he got caught. Dad talked him into boning his mother, and her last words before she passed out were, "That's my boy."

Now, if that sparks your kiddy fetish, that's your problem.

Are you gonna tell me I can't write that story and post it here because you don't think it passes the rule test?

The OP never said underage, they never mentioned any age at all. You decided to insult them by implying they'd broken the rules. You're the asshole here, just deal with it.

 

[lovecraft68]

You called me a vulture because I disagreed with you.

Bobby is twenty-four, and for his mother's 45th birthday he came home for a week to celebrate it with his parents. He found dirty home movies while looking for his old Topgun video cassette. He heard them coming down the hall, so he hid in the closet.

Dad had bought Mom some sexy new lingerie, and she couldn't wait to get fucked in it. Bobby watched from the closet, but he got caught. Dad talked him into boning his mother, and her last words before she passed out were, "That's my boy."

Now, if that sparks your kiddy fetish, that's your problem.

Are you gonna tell me I can't write that story and post it here because you don't think it passes the rule test?

The OP never said underage, they never mentioned any age at all. You decided to insult them by implying they'd broken the rules. You're the asshole here, just deal with it.

It passes because you said 24 first.

But you could leave it out and still write it that way.

"Be a good boy and lick your mother's pussy the way she told you to" would pass as well.

I think of age is assumes unless the author states something or makes his character act is such an immature way as to create the idea he is underage.

I've heard of role playing stories being banned here when adults pretend to be kids.

Its a privately owned site and whereas no other crime or squick factor is an issue there is an obvious aversion to under age by the one person who runs lit. Underage is not illegal it is a rule they chose for the site.

On one hand they enforce it to the point of paranoia. On the other hand the negligible screening process leaves the site full of those stories.

 

[Catchalot]

Dipshit said the scenario implied he was underage, and you'd have to streeetch your belief system for it to be an adult. I just posted a quick scenario that works just fine, and its identical to what the OP posted minus the age, but the scenario is the same.

Luckily, he said he was done fighting about it, so he won't return to this thread, because he's a man of his word