Does a small cock effect a man's ability to be dominate ?

MilwaukeeMike28

Really Really Experienced
Joined
May 18, 2005
Posts
469
I would think a little cock or even an average sized cock would effect a man's ability to be sexually dominate. What do you think ?
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
I would think a little cock or even an average sized cock would effect a man's ability to be sexually dominate. What do you think ?

Nah, I think its about personality.
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
I would think a little cock or even an average sized cock would effect a man's ability to be sexually dominate. What do you think ?

Having been in the community off and on for more than 30 years, I've seen Dominants with small- and average- and above-average-sized cocks... and pyls the same... as bisexplicit says, personality is more important.
 
Marquis said:
My cock is about average.

I do ok.
Just ok? yeesh, you have two girls Marquis, I'd think you'd have to be super ok.....

:p
 
<insert obligatory joke involving ship size and ocean motion>

But really. Domination is a personality... and attitude... a trait -- it's absolutely not tied to anatomy at all.
 
Sir_Winston54 said:
Having been in the community off and on for more than 30 years, I've seen Dominants with small- and average- and above-average-sized cocks... and pyls the same... as bisexplicit says, personality is more important.

what he said
 
Liana26 said:
what he said

But if a guy has a small cock and he's asking if it affects his ability to dominate, and adds that he think it would, I would say -- absolutely. He will be having a very difficult time of it. He already told himself he thinks it's a problem.

It has nothing to do with the size, but the self confidence issue. If he is obsessing about his size, he will be second guessing his abilities.

No matter what a female sub tells him -- even his own female sub -- if he can't get that issue out of his head he'll be distracted by it.

He needs to get over the issue himself. What other people think won't really help.

Akasha
 
Have to agree with Akasha and add a Dominant does not dominate with their cock, pussy, breasts, or other body parts, they dominate with their mind and character/personality. If you are going to be insecure about some part of you, especially if you think it has relevance to the ability to dominate, you are going to be fighting an uphill battle from day one.

Catalina :rose:
 
Why are some men so hung up about size issues? It makes no difference at all....domination is a mind and personality thing!

With ref to Akasha's post, some very good points, but I wonder, if that person is so insecure would he actually manage to put across his domliness? Or would it be like a cover to hide his insecurities? :)
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
I would think a little cock or even an average sized cock would effect a man's ability to be sexually dominate. What do you think ?
i suppose it would depend upon the many other circumstances involved.

1. are we talking about a smoothly plucked cock ... or ... fully feathered.
2. does it's early morning wake up calls annoy the neighbors.
3. is it running about galivanting like a gigilo in heat, pecking at every hen it finds... or is the cock monogamous.
4. is the small to average sized cock intent on being a 'dominate' to a slave or does it prefer a 'submit'.
5. is this a fully pedigreed small to average size cock we speak of.
6. has this dominate cock yet been registered and been assigned it's proper barcode at the web site provided for the recognition of status provided for such.
7. is this cock a purdue or a butterball.

please excuse my lack of caps ... the caps key lock on my keyboard is broken. thanks.
 
Dominant. Not dominate.

I couldn't help it. That bugs the hell out of me.
 
sinn0cent1 said:
i suppose it would depend upon the many other circumstances involved.

1. are we talking about a smoothly plucked cock ... or ... fully feathered.
2. does it's early morning wake up calls annoy the neighbors.
3. is it running about galivanting like a gigilo in heat, pecking at every hen it finds... or is the cock monogamous.
4. is the small to average sized cock intent on being a 'dominate' to a slave or does it prefer a 'submit'.
5. is this a fully pedigreed small to average size cock we speak of.
6. has this dominate cock yet been registered and been assigned it's proper barcode at the web site provided for the recognition of status provided for such.
7. is this cock a purdue or a butterball.

please excuse my lack of caps ... the caps key lock on my keyboard is broken. thanks.


*giggles* I love a smart ass.
 
This may be an old cliche', but I just can't help myself. "It is not the size of the wand that counts. It's the magic within it."
Spank my ass hard and for a long time and I'll beg you to put it into me no matter what size it is.
 
sunfox said:
Dominant. Not dominate.

I couldn't help it. That bugs the hell out of me.

Okay. I'll nominate sunfox for a slot on the Language Nazi staff. All in favor, say "aye." Those opposed, signify by the same sign.
 
Actually cock size IS important to all "true pyl"s... Along with wardrobe (black leather ONLY please, unless it's black silk, of course), bankroll (nothing less that 10K a month, usd, please and thank you.), transportation (sports cars that go really fast or motorcycles), and of course the usual tall, dark, muscled and handsome thing...

Okay, enough being rude here.

No, cock size doesn't matter when it comes to domination. Confidence does though, and if it worries you that much it will affect you and your partner.
 
Why would the size of your dick matter if your the DOM? If your sub complains go down to the sex shop and get the biggest one they got, problem solved.
 
Sir_Winston54 said:
Okay. I'll nominate sunfox for a slot on the Language Nazi staff. All in favor, say "aye." Those opposed, signify by the same sign.

I try not to be all picky, but sometimes it's just impossible for me to not say something. :D
 
hazel43 said:
This may be an old cliche', but I just can't help myself. "It is not the size of the wand that counts. It's the magic within it."
Spank my ass hard and for a long time and I'll beg you to put it into me no matter what size it is.
a similar version i am more familiar with .......
'it's not the size of the worm that matters ... it's all about 'how well' it wiggles.
 
I have a male dominant friend, married to a female submissive. She complained once he didn't have the longevity she'd like. He trussed her up, winched up a big dildo, inserted a industrial vibrator in her rope bondage, and let her contemplate duration for a few hours. All I had to say was, "do you have a sister?"

cheers, sw
 
sinn0cent1 said:
...please excuse my lack of caps ... the caps key lock on my keyboard is broken. thanks.
I think the one in your head is broken, too. :rolleyes: Isn't butterball a turkey?
 
MilwaukeeMike28 said:
I would think a little cock or even an average sized cock would effect a man's ability to be sexually dominate. What do you think ?
It's not how big you maike it, it's how you make it big.
 
DVS said:
I think the one in your head is broken, too. :rolleyes: Isn't butterball a turkey?
Yes, it certainly is .... i was just waiting to see if anyone was paying attention. ;) heh..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top