Do you think the Official Conspiracy Theorists like tinfoil?

[phrodeau]

(edited)
Every security camera image that I've ever seen had a date and time stamp.

How many have you seen?

Dates and times are easily derived from timecodes on the video frames, which are implanted in the framing data. It's only visible on the screen if the vertical hold is out of adjustment.

 

[NothingHitMe]

People saw and heard these members give way: loud, dramatic and explosive. To say that they were caused by explosives is conclusory, not dispositive. .

Are you insisting then that hundreds of witnesses are all idiots?

Including those who have seen and heard explosives, including controlled demolitions many times before?

This sounds like you are only making excuses. Bugger off.

 

[NothingHitMe]

Dates and times are..balabababab

Now you pretend that you are the expert.

You're not. You're a shill. Nobody cares a fuck about your personal opinion or your claims. You can't support those claims with a cited expert opinion, links, and sources, you have nothing.

 

[fillmup]

Why is anyone here wasting time arguing with an intellectual dwarf. He should be wrapped in tin foil and duct taped securely.

 

[NothingHitMe]

Gringao counter this, and stop dodging;

"Cellphones can't make calls from passenger aircraft from the 5-6 miles up, while the plane is flying at 500mph. Expert opinion and scientific studies agrees with this, as has been cited repeatedly. That brings into the question the airfone calls, which could be dismissed since there are no records of them, and it is already widely known that the cellphone calls were faked."

If you can dispute it, then provide evidence. I believe that on other threads about phone calls none of you shills has been able to prove that cellphones can make calls under those conditions.

None of you have won that debate yet. I checked.

 

[NothingHitMe]

Why is anyone here wasting time arguing with an intellectual dwarf. He should be wrapped in tin foil and duct taped securely.

Hello intellectual dwarf, you must be another tinfoil hat wearer.

 

[breakwall]

In the real world, where most of us live, you don't need video of someone getting shot to prove that someone suffered a gunshot wound.

What you get is a gaping hole and possibly an imbedded slug. You don't need to be a genius to figure out that it's a gunshot wound.

At the Pentagon, there is a gaping hole, filled with debris consistent with that of an Boeing 747. Aboard that Boeing 747 there were 64 people, all dead.

There is a list of names located on CNN here.

125 employees at the Pentagon also died during that incident and their names are also listed on CNN

Pictures of the debris at the site can be found here. An effort has been made to match the debris up to the location of the jet it came from.

I would also enter this disturbing image as proof of the human loss at the Pentagon. This is Exhibit GX-P200045, entered into evidence at the Moussaoui trial.

Eyewitness testimony to the plane crash can be found here. And while I can't speak to the veracity of the host site, it has working links to back up it's quotes to such sources as Navytimes, CNN, Detroit News, DC Military and the Guardian UK.

The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. If NO cameras were present and NO images were taken, the result would still be the same: On September 11th, 2001, Flight 77, a Boeing 747, crashed into the Pentagon, killing all 64 aboard and 125 employees in the building itself.

If there were NO airliner, I would be interested to know just where those 64 people went to.

 

[NothingHitMe]

View Poll Results: What do you think? Do the tinfoil hats suit them? Are they completely crazy and wrong

Yes - they're NUTS in tinfoil hats 39 88.64%
No - I'm wearing one too (wooohooo!) 5 11.36%


Voters: 44. This poll is closed

I win.

 

[Drinking Cap]

View Poll Results: What do you think? Do the tinfoil hats suit them? Are they completely crazy and wrong

Yes - they're NUTS in tinfoil hats 39 88.64%
No - I'm wearing one too (wooohooo!) 5 11.36%


Voters: 44. This poll is closed

I win.

So do you and the rest of LN's personalities get together for a party now or what?

 

[Sean]

Gringao counter this, and stop dodging;

"Cellphones can't make calls from passenger aircraft from the 5-6 miles up, while the plane is flying at 500mph. Expert opinion and scientific studies agrees with this, as has been cited repeatedly. That brings into the question the airfone calls, which could be dismissed since there are no records of them, and it is already widely known that the cellphone calls were faked."

If you can dispute it, then provide evidence. I believe that on other threads about phone calls none of you shills has been able to prove that cellphones can make calls under those conditions.

None of you have won that debate yet. I checked.

BECAUSE THE PLANE WASN'T FIVE MILES UP YOU FUCKING CRETIN. IT WAS AT ABOUT 1500 FEET. YOU ARE A FUCKING TOOL.

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)
I win.

That looks familiar.

 

[phrodeau]

I have some questions yet unanswered.

How many crash tests did Boeing do on the 757?

I saw a photograph indicating damage from the engines on the Pentagon. Was that a hoax? If it was, do you have proof?

How many people witnessed explosives in the WTC buildings before they were detonated?

How was the seismic data collected, and did it take into account the flexibility of the WTC's foundation?

Do you have evidence of any steel and concrete building of that stature collapsing at slower than freefall speed - controlled demolition or not?

 

[fillmup]

I win.

OK, I figured it out. You're Dollparts alt aren't you? She's the only one here naive and dumb enough to continue fostering such a stupid train of thought.

 

[plasticman33]

BECAUSE THE PLANE WASN'T FIVE MILES UP YOU FUCKING CRETIN. IT WAS AT ABOUT 1500 FEET. YOU ARE A FUCKING TOOL.

Relax Sean, they don't give IQ tests to register here.

 

[NothingHitMe]

BECAUSE THE PLANE WASN'T FIVE MILES UP YOU FUCKING CRETIN. IT WAS AT ABOUT 1500 FEET. YOU ARE A FUCKING TOOL.

I can do that too

PROVE IT THEN WITH CITED SOURCES, LINKS, SHOWING THE EXACT HEIGHT THAT THE PLANES WERE FLYING AT. YOU ARE A FUCKING TOOL.

 

[unregistered]

 

[NothingHitMe]

Relax Sean, they don't give IQ tests to register here.

Hi tinfoil hat wearer, this is yours isn't it?

http://www.digitalfox.com/digitalfox/johnf-ingkerry/foilhat_files/foil5.jpg

 

[zipman]

Relax Sean, they don't give IQ tests to register here.

Heh!

 

[NothingHitMe]

Hello shill

 

[Gringao]

So you claim. Where's the passport photo and/or other ID photo to compare the faces of the men alleged to be them, and their ID photos?

Why would I waste my time doing that when you've been wrong about every single point so far?

 

[Sean]

Fucking hell, it takes something fairly spectacular to put me, Gringao and Zip on the same side of an argument.

 

[Gringao]

Fucking hell, it takes something fairly spectacular to put me, Gringao and Zip on the same side of an argument.

I feel so...dirty.

 

[NothingHitMe]

Why would I waste my time doing that when you've been wrong about every single point so far?

Dodging again.

Where's the passport photo and/or other ID photo to compare the faces of the men alleged to be them, and their ID photos

Otherwise you really are a fucking loser

 

[NothingHitMe]

Fucking hell, it takes something fairly spectacular to put me, Gringao and Zip on the same side of an argument.

Why would it? You're a shill too without any doubt

 

[zipman]

Fucking hell, it takes something fairly spectacular to put me, Gringao and Zip on the same side of an argument.

Fairly spectacular - no.

Incredibly moronic - yes.