Do you think Mueller should be fired?

Should Mueller be fired


  • Total voters
    109
You keep posting that BS but to date you haven't provided a single piece of evidence that Steele, or anyone on his behalf, worked with people claiming to represent the Russian government in their discussions with him.
Not to mention the fact you've never provided any evidence there was an attempt to "frame" Trump.

Whereas there is concrete proof the Trump campaign was excited to meet with someone who represented the Russian government, in order to get information detrimental to Clinton's election efforts.

You're biggest problem is you're not informed enough to post:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/the-russians-colluded-massively-with-democrats/
 
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence but it gets pretty suspicious after a year of the same old bullshit.

My guess is they find something....because if you keep digging, I mean, nobody is 100% clean. Especially Trump...he may have found a way to keep most things under the radar.

I wonder if they dug deep into Mother Teresa's past....maybe they find something....
 
Obstruction? A president cannot be indicted merely for exercising his or her constitutional duties.
Read the articles of impeachment (indictment) of Johnson, Nixon, and Clinton.

This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller's team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the defendant.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/30556/disaster-mueller-indicted-russian-company-didnt-ryan-saavedra

Ah, The Daily Wire
"DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified."... The Daily Wire has published a number of articles which cast doubt that climate change is occurring and that humans contribute to climate change. Experts have described the articles as inaccurate and misleading.
Believe what you want, AJ.
 
He could announce to the world why he did it and it wouldn't change the fact that Comey was fired. He has every constitutional right to control the DOJ or the FBI and direct their activities, though their is no evidence he even did that.

This is not settled as much as you like to think it is. As several others have said, it will go to SCOTUS unless the house flips, or heads start popping out of dark places.
 
More and more comes out daily, more folks flipping around Cohen and Manafort, more secret meetings exposed that lend credence to the dossier, fissures are starting to appear in the bubble.
 
Has anyone asked Shep if he ever wondered why, if the FBI was only concerned with Russian infiltration, why they didn't have any spy (informants) in the Clinton Campaign?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Didn't think so.

Because Clinton isn't fucking president and probably wasn't infiltrated by anyone.
 
How do you know that they didn't?
Because Trump hasn't said anything about it.

Trump is President, and he can find those things out. If there was a program of surveillance of all the campaigns, Trump would shut it down and expose the whole scheme. Instead, Trump didn't bother to research beyond his TV, and announced that only his campaign was spied on.
 
Because Trump hasn't said anything about it.

Trump is President, and he can find those things out. If there was a program of surveillance of all the campaigns, Trump would shut it down and expose the whole scheme. Instead, Trump didn't bother to research beyond his TV, and announced that only his campaign was spied on.
I'll repeat the obvious: If a Deep State existed, either Tromp would be long gone already, or the DS is so incompetent that it poses no danger, being unable to get a nice clean hit (term of art for successful op) even on the fat juicy target Tromp.

Beware the boogeyman.
 
Has anyone asked Shep if he ever wondered why, if the FBI was only concerned with Russian infiltration, why they didn't have any spy (informants) in the Clinton Campaign?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Didn't think so.

So what about Gowdy and Napolitano? They making it up, too?
Maybe Hannity is the only one that matters to you.
 
Trump wasn't President when Obama ordered his campaign infiltrated either.

Gowdy disputes Trump's 'spy' claim, says FBI acted properly

A senior House Republican briefed by the FBI on its Russia probe is disputing President Donald Trump's allegation that the agency spied on his 2016 campaign for political purposes. Rep. Trey Gowdy told "CBS This Morning" and Fox News there is no evidence of FBI misconduct or that the agency planted a "spy" in Trump's campaign. His statements appeared to contradict the president, who has said the FBI planted a "spy for political reasons and to help Crooked Hillary win."



Hmmmmmmmmmmmmnmm.........



Comshaw
 
How do you know that they didn't?

No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened. Remember the DNC told the FBI to get lost when they wanted to look at their computers for evidence of Russian hacking the Democrats themselves alleged.

Remember too, the entire basis for the investigation of "collusion" by the Russians and the Trump Campaign was a baseless manufactured dossier, compiled by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign, and used by the Obama administration as probable cause to obtain Fisa Court warrants to spy on American citizens to undermine the election in Hillary's favor. In the event she failed to be elected the conspiracy would continue efforts to frame the President and further a silent coup to reverse the election.

Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.
 
No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened. Remember the DNC told the FBI to get lost when they wanted to look at their computers for evidence of Russian hacking the Democrats themselves alleged.

Remember too, the entire basis for the investigation of "collusion" by the Russians and the Trump Campaign was a baseless manufactured dossier, compiled by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign, and used by the Obama administration as probable cause to obtain Fisa Court warrants to spy on American citizens to undermine the election in Hillary's favor. In the event she failed to be elected the conspiracy would continue efforts to frame the President and further a silent coup to reverse the election.

Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.


Again.....

Gowdy disputes Trump's 'spy' claim, says FBI acted properly




Comshaw
 
No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened. Remember the DNC told the FBI to get lost when they wanted to look at their computers for evidence of Russian hacking the Democrats themselves alleged.

Remember too, the entire basis for the investigation of "collusion" by the Russians and the Trump Campaign was a baseless manufactured dossier, compiled by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign, and used by the Obama administration as probable cause to obtain Fisa Court warrants to spy on American citizens to undermine the election in Hillary's favor. In the event she failed to be elected the conspiracy would continue efforts to frame the President and further a silent coup to reverse the election.

Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.

So, your evidence is circumstantial, but the mountain range of circumstantial evidence of Trump collusion and obstruction is irrelevant?
 
No evidence of such has been leaked, and it would have if it happened. Remember the DNC told the FBI to get lost when they wanted to look at their computers for evidence of Russian hacking the Democrats themselves alleged.

Remember too, the entire basis for the investigation of "collusion" by the Russians and the Trump Campaign was a baseless manufactured dossier, compiled by foreign agents, paid for by the Clinton Campaign, and used by the Obama administration as probable cause to obtain Fisa Court warrants to spy on American citizens to undermine the election in Hillary's favor. In the event she failed to be elected the conspiracy would continue efforts to frame the President and further a silent coup to reverse the election.

Remember Comey and Clapper both testified under oath they did not spy on the Trump campaign, Now they say in public they did but only out of a concern for Russian "collusion" which we now know was a totally manufactured line of bullshit with ZERO evidence of its existence.

No one cares what liars have to say, liar.
 
Collusion is not necessarily a crime and Mueller's brief doesn't mention it.

Conspiracy IS a felony and it's already been admitted.

The chickens panic as the fox approaches.
 
Back
Top