Do you believe that men are a threat to the nation's security?

[LJ_Reloaded]

Or do you say "not all men"?

http://www.feministcurrent.com/2016/01/07/its-time-to-consider-a-curfew-for-men/

“What real impact would a curfew have?” you might ask. Certainly it would send the message that we are taking men’s behaviour seriously and that it is no longer acceptable. Certainly it would allow women to move about more safely at night — on campus, in their homes, at bars, at the bus stop. Certainly it would name the problem. It would say, unequivocally, “The problem is you, men. You are the problem, and therefore, it is you who must be stopped.”

http://www.radfemcollective.org/news/2015/8/29/an-interview-with-julie-bindel

will heterosexuality survive women’s liberation?

It won’t, not unless men get their act together, have their power taken from them and behave themselves. I mean, I would actually put them all in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans. I would give them a choice of vehicles to drive around with, give them no porn, they wouldn’t be able to fight – we would have wardens, of course! Women who want to see their sons or male loved ones would be able to go and visit, or take them out like a library book, and then bring them back.

What, you say not all men are like that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NotAllMen

The phrase "not all men are like that," as a general defense of men in gendered criticisms of their behavior, has been around for more than a decade.[5] It has been used as early as 1836 in author Charles Dickens' book The Pickwick Papers, in which, in response to the statement "Men are such deceivers", Mr Tupman replies "But not all men". The #NotAllMen Twitter hashtag was tweeted as early as 2011. The first viral tweet with this phrase, which was not yet a hashtag, was a satirical tweet by Shafiqah Hudson (sassycrass on Twitter) in February 2013: "ME: Men and boys are socially instructed to not listen to us. They are taught to interrupt us when we- RANDOM MAN: Excuse me. Not ALL men."[5][6] The stereotypical "Not-All-Man", barging into a conversation criticizing male behavior, was caricatured in a comic by artist Matt Lubchansky on April 14, 2014.[3][5][7] Lubchansky's comic was quickly retweeted and otherwise shared by several notable male celebrities including Wil Wheaton, Paul F. Tompkins, Matt Fraction, and John Scalzi.[3]

Before 2013, #NotAllMen was not seen as a derailment tactic; the most common strategies cited by feminist bloggers were "'what about the men?' and 'patriarchy hurts men too'—pleas for inclusion, not for exemption".[3] The hashtag #NotAllMen "seemingly began as a sincere way to counter feminist arguments".[8] #NotAllMen, however, is often impugned by feminists. As a feminist writer states, "The phrase has been reappropriated by feminists and turned into a meme meant to parody its pervasiveness and bad faith."[5] #NotAllMen-related memes include references to Aquaman, Adventure Time, Magic: The Gathering, and the Kool Aid Man crashing through a wall to exclaim "not all men".[9]

If you're a feminist then you must believe that men are a national security emergency. Because #YesAllWomen are oppressed by men, and #NotAllMen is a pathetic answer to that. Right?

http://time.com/114043/yesallwomen-hashtag-santa-barbara-shooting/

Because every woman I know has experienced some form of sexual harassment, abuse or assault, myself included. #YesAllWomen

So are you a good feminist or not?

(Hint: Yes, I'm making fun of feminist logic.)