Distrust of Asian Americans on the rise

RobDownSouth

Oh Look....
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Posts
75,137
I wonder why?
LvqekiN.jpg
 
Thankfully DimmBulb doesn't represent patriotic Asian-Americans.
 
I am a white Gentile. I prefer Orientals to whites. I have never known an Oriental I did not like. I expect China to achieve world hegemony by the end of this century. I hope that by then the Chinese mainland adopts a democratic form of government. Because democracy works well in Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, and because the average IQ in China is 105, I am confident that democracy will work well on the mainland.

I also expect the United States to be dominated by a high IQ cognitive elite composed largely of Jews and Orientals. As our economy and our society become increasingly complex, there will be a growing need for brilliant people to be in charge.

Race does not matter. What matters is IQ.
 
I am a white Gentile. I prefer Orientals to whites. I have never known an Oriental I did not like. I expect China to achieve world hegemony by the end of this century. I hope that by then the Chinese mainland adopts a democratic form of government. Because democracy works well in Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, and because the average IQ in China is 105, I am confident that democracy will work well on the mainland.

I also expect the United States to be dominated by a high IQ cognitive elite composed largely of Jews and Orientals. As our economy and our society become increasingly complex, there will be a growing need for brilliant people to be in charge.

Race does not matter. What matters is IQ.
IQ is a made-up statistic
 
IQ is a made-up statistic
For over a century IQ tests have demonstrated their ability in predicting academic and economic success and other desirable outcomes in life. The U.S. military pioneered the use of IQ tests during the First World War. It remains committed to the tests because they can tell who can learn complex skills quickly and well and who cannot.

-----------

The Truth About Income Inequality in America​


By Charles Murray
FEBRUARY 10, 2012, The Atlantic

In the early 1990s, Bill Gates was asked what competitor worried him the most. Goldman Sachs, Gates answered. He explained: "Software is an IQ business. Microsoft must win the IQ war, or we won't have a future. I don't worry about Lotus or IBM, because the smartest guys would rather come to work for Microsoft. Our competitors for IQ are investment banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley." Gates's comment reflected a reality that has driven the formation of the new upper class: Over the last century, brains became much more valuable in the marketplace.

https://www.theatlantic.com/busines...th-about-income-inequality-in-america/252892/
 
Last edited:
For over a century IQ tests have demonstrated their ability in predicting academic and economic success and other desirable outcomes in life.
How many IQ tests have you taken that had any bearing on your life, job, family or outcome?

How many have been the same?

Get a fucking clue
 
How many IQ tests have you taken that had any bearing on your life, job, family or outcome?

How many have been the same?

Get a fucking clue
I was given an IQ test when I was seven years old. I was told I scored well.

I had to take one IQ test to qualify for computer training. My last two computer jobs required me to pass IQ tests.
 
For over a century IQ tests have demonstrated their ability in predicting academic and economic success and other desirable outcomes in life.
You sure put a lot of faith in a test, yet reality shows it is the risk taker personalities that actually succeeded best in the financial arena. Take Bill Gates as an example, his success is not founded in IQ but in risk taking. As an employee for IBM he bought windows from two university programmers, and then licensed it to his employer, keeping the ownership for himself. No IQ requirement there....just plain old balls.

From personal experience a friend of mine who is very successful in business was a high school drop out. In public school he was in the "special education classes". Yet he left school took a risk and started a business, and worked solely to that purpose and today is a multi millionaire, with what I suspect is a sub 100 IQ.

Just two examples of average IQ success. You only need to look to the vast number of un or under-employed PhD's out there to show how a higher IQ does not entail either personal or professional success.

Then again you only give a shit about IQ as a proof in your own personal racism.
 
You sure put a lot of faith in a test, yet reality shows it is the risk taker personalities that actually succeeded best in the financial arena. Take Bill Gates as an example, his success is not founded in IQ but in risk taking. As an employee for IBM he bought windows from two university programmers, and then licensed it to his employer, keeping the ownership for himself. No IQ requirement there....just plain old balls.

From personal experience a friend of mine who is very successful in business was a high school drop out. In public school he was in the "special education classes". Yet he left school took a risk and started a business, and worked solely to that purpose and today is a multi millionaire, with what I suspect is a sub 100 IQ.

Just two examples of average IQ success. You only need to look to the vast number of un or under-employed PhD's out there to show how a higher IQ does not entail either personal or professional success.

Then again you only give a shit about IQ as a proof in your own personal racism.
Bill Gates has an IQ of 160.
 
I was given an IQ test when I was seven years old. I was told I scored well.

I had to take one IQ test to qualify for computer training. My last two computer jobs required me to pass IQ tests.
Of course they did.

Lol
 
Wherever you look, Asians [ie., Orientals] outperform whites academically and financially...

we have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between Asian IQ — North Asian IQ — and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

I think Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society.

- Jared Taylor Interview
 
Asians have faced fierce discrimination in America, but this has not stopped them from working hard and getting ahead.In fact, they have been so successful in "racist" America that whites have even begun to complain about Asian achievement.

Whether one looks at Japanese and Chinese, who have been in America for generations, or Koreans and Vietnamese, who have arrived more recently, Asians have been remarkably successful...

The achievements of more recent Asian immigrants have been well publicized. Everyone has heard of Vietnamese children who came to America unable to speak English and then, a few yearslater, graduated at the tops of their high-school classes...

Throughout this period of constant prejudice and persecution, Chinese worked hard, saved their money, and built better lives for themselves. By the time they had full, legal standing in this country, many Chinese had incomes comparable to those of native-born whites.

By 1969, Chinese as a group outearned Italian, German, and even Anglo-Saxon Americans.

During the 1960s, Chinatown was the part of San Francisco with the most unemployment and poverty, the highest rate of tuberculosis, the least education, and the most substandard housing. Nevertheless, in 1965, only five people of Chinese ancestry went to jail in the whole state of California.

- Jared Taylor, "Paved with Good Intentions"
 

Top 10 Smartest Countries by IQ - Ulster Institute 2019:*​

  1. Japan - 106.49
  2. Taiwan - 106.47
  3. Singapore - 105.89
  4. Hong Kong (China) - 105.37
  5. China - 104.10
  6. South Korea - 102.35
  7. Belarus - 101.60
  8. Finland - 101.20
  9. Liechtenstein - 101.07
  10. Netherlands & Germany (tie) - 100.74...

Top 10 Smartest Countries Based on Reading, Math and Science - OECD PISA 2018:​

  1. China - 555, 591, 590
  2. Singapore - 549, 569, 551
  3. Macau (China) - 525, 558, 544
  4. Hong Kong (China) - 524, 551, 517
  5. Estonia - 523, 523, 530
  6. Canada - 520, 512, 518
  7. Finland - 520, 507, 522
  8. Ireland - 518, 500, 496
  9. Korea - 514, 526, 519
  10. Poland - 512, 516, 511
  11. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/smartest-countries
 
Now show us their healthcare, education systems, income gaps, living conditions, prison system, etc etc.
 
or over a century IQ tests have demonstrated their ability in predicting academic and economic success and other desirable outcomes in life. The U.S. military pioneered the use of IQ tests during the First World War. It remains committed to the tests because they can tell who can learn complex skills quickly and well and who cannot.
They still sent our boys to die in a stupid war that never should have happened
 

Top 10 Smartest Countries by IQ - Ulster Institute 2019:*​

  1. Japan - 106.49
  2. Taiwan - 106.47
  3. Singapore - 105.89
  4. Hong Kong (China) - 105.37
  5. China - 104.10
  6. South Korea - 102.35
  7. Belarus - 101.60
  8. Finland - 101.20
  9. Liechtenstein - 101.07
  10. Netherlands & Germany (tie) - 100.74...

Top 10 Smartest Countries Based on Reading, Math and Science - OECD PISA 2018:​

  1. China - 555, 591, 590
  2. Singapore - 549, 569, 551
  3. Macau (China) - 525, 558, 544
  4. Hong Kong (China) - 524, 551, 517
  5. Estonia - 523, 523, 530
  6. Canada - 520, 512, 518
  7. Finland - 520, 507, 522
  8. Ireland - 518, 500, 496
  9. Korea - 514, 526, 519
  10. Poland - 512, 516, 511

  11. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/smartest-countries
China has the largest because it literally has 1/5 of population by sheer statistics it will

India while it should rival China have a large amount of poverty

And the fact that you uesd all of China is telling
 
China has the largest because it literally has 1/5 of population by sheer statistics it will

India while it should rival China have a large amount of poverty

And the fact that you uesd all of China is telling
The average of China, taken of all Chinese, is high.
 
They still sent our boys to die in a stupid war that never should have happened
The military doesn't use an IQ test however. The ASVAB is more like taking timed finals for every subject all at once. It's still broken but it has some ups. I'm in the 99th percentile in English for males, 95th for females. Mechanical skills. I'm not even above average for a woman. I forget what the other tests are but I couldn't possibly be but so high with math.
 
Regardless of the "stats", race doesn't determine smarts. Culture, environment and determination factor.
 
Back
Top