Did you know that wanting to pleasure your woman is actually SEXIST?

[LJ_Reloaded]

I'm literally dying with laughter here

help me

I can't fucking breathe

somebody help me

http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/12/focusing-on-her-pleasure/

We’re starting to talk more about giving equal weight to women’s pleasure in man/woman sexual encounters, and that’s awesome.

As a woman, you’d think I’d be all for focusing more on women’s pleasure in sex. And I am – mostly.

Sometimes, though, I’ll hear a hetero guy talking about how important women’s pleasure is, and it leaves me cringing. Worse yet, sometimes I’ve had sex with men who said they were all about my pleasure – and in a sense, they were – yet I still ended up feeling like their feelings and needs were more important than my actual experiences.

In this article, I’ll be discussing three ways “I love giving a woman pleasure!” can still be all about the male partner. I’ll also talk about what to do if you experience this or think you might be doing it.

 

[Queersetti]

I'm literally dying with laughter here

help me

I can't fucking breathe

somebody help me

Dammit, man, stay away from those peanuts!

 

[Colonel Hogan]

From the article:

Take the pressure off yourself to be the perfect lover.

Uh...okay. So I'll just cum on your face, then.

 

[girlsmiley]

IWorse yet, sometimes I’ve had sex with men who said

I had no idea.

 

[Aella_]

I had no idea.

oy GS, how did you manage to trip'n fall in this thread?
You and the OP couldn't be any more different (like chalk and cheese).

 

[knottygirl]

My body doesn't respond to a guy like this; who seems more interested in my orgasm than his own. He comes across as submissive and weak. I don't even like guys to go down on me. The physical stimulation is very pleasant, but mentally, it is a turn off. I'm much more likely to have an orgasm from giving head (while squeezing my thighs together). So basically, the less a guy seems to care about my orgasm; the more he uses my body as a means to achieve his own pleasure, the more likely he is to give me an orgasm. Its a paradox. Like the tighter you grip jello, the more likely you are to drop it. I just focus on giving the male(s) pleasure, and my own pleasure will usually come about as an effortless bi-product. From an evolutionary perspective, giving primacy to the male orgasm makes perfect sense. It is, after all, the only orgasm that is necessary for procreation.

It is really hard for feminazis to have gratifying sex with men. They want to enjoy egalitarian, reciprocal, affirmative consent sex with good feminist boys who have been properly stripped of all their toxic masculinity. But for some reason, their bodies just won't cooperate. When this happens, they predictably blame men.

 

[Borscht]

XXXXXX

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

My body doesn't respond to a guy like this; who seems more interested in my orgasm than his own. He comes across as submissive and weak. I don't even like guys to go down on me. The physical stimulation is very pleasant, but mentally, it is a turn off. I'm much more likely to have an orgasm from giving head (while squeezing my thighs together). So basically, the less a guy seems to care about my orgasm; the more he uses my body as a means to achieve his own pleasure, the more likely he is to give me an orgasm. Its a paradox. Like the tighter you grip jello, the more likely you are to drop it. I just focus on giving the male(s) pleasure, and my own pleasure will usually come about as an effortless bi-product. From an evolutionary perspective, giving primacy to the male orgasm makes perfect sense. It is, after all, the only orgasm that is necessary for procreation.

It is really hard for feminazis to have gratifying sex with men. They want to enjoy egalitarian, reciprocal, affirmative consent sex with good feminist boys who have been properly stripped of all their toxic masculinity. But for some reason, their bodies just won't cooperate. When this happens, they predictably blame men.

And the thing is, going down on a woman ain't a feminist thing. They have no right to claim that as theirs. It's something that is awesome if and when both parties enjoy it, no matter what the ideology.

Feminists cannot have gratifying sex with men because they see all men as some kind of insidious or overt threat.

On the other hand I guess Conservatives can have "meaningful" sex if the woman accepts her role as an object, but if you ask me that's as dry and spiritually empty as feminist sex *ducks*

 

[rosco rathbone]

It's not too complicated. All the female wants is for you to take her pleasure into account in a kind of casual, offhand, competent way while simultaneously ravishing her and making her the love slave to your unbearably intense passionate needs. This is all obvious to anyone with normal sex experience by age 25.

 

[knottygirl]

It's not too complicated. All the female wants is for you to take her pleasure into account in a kind of casual, offhand, competent way while simultaneously ravishing her and making her the love slave to your unbearably intense passionate needs. This is all obvious to anyone with normal sex experience by age 25.

Well put!