Dershowitz: Trump 100% WRONG There Never Should Have Been Special Counsel

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,158
The self promoted civil libertarian got this one wrong for sure. Sessions recused himself and they are many unanswered questions about the extent of the collusion between the Trump campaign and the acceptance of Russian help in the 2016 election. Trump fired Comey and brought it in himself.

The only answer was to have a special counsel investigate the issue.

And to add some perspective: 4 years of Benghazi: 0 indictments.

14 months of Mueller: 23 indictments.
 
Is there some reason why this isn't in the original thread where i don't need to flip between 2 tabs to read what the fuck you're talking about?

Counterpost is counter.
 
The self promoted civil libertarian got this one wrong for sure. Sessions recused himself and they are many unanswered questions about the extent of the collusion between the Trump campaign and the acceptance of Russian help in the 2016 election. Trump fired Comey and brought it in himself.

The only answer was to have a special counsel investigate the issue.

And to add some perspective: 4 years of Benghazi: 0 indictments.

14 months of Mueller: 23 indictments.

So . . . guess what? One of those Russian businesses, Concord Management and Consulting, wants its day in court. It has retained the Washington law firm of Reed Smith, two of whose partners, Eric Dubelier and Katherine Seikaly, have told Mueller that Concord is ready to have its trial — and by the way, let’s see all the discovery the law requires you to disclose, including all the evidence you say supports the extravagant allegations in the indictment.

Needless to say, Mueller’s team is not happy about this development since this is not a case they figured on having to prosecute to anything more than a successful press conference. So, they have sought delay on the astonishing ground that the defendant has not been properly served — notwithstanding that the defendant has shown up in court and asked to be arraigned.

Understand, service of process is simply the means by which a party seeks what Mueller has already got: the opposing party’s appearance in the lawsuit. But Mueller’s argument is so priceless we can’t let it go unstated: In order to serve the defendants in a criminal case in which Mueller alleges that Russia is an adversary government that conducted espionage operations against the American election, the Justice Department sought the assistance of . . . yes . . . the government of Russia. I know you’ll be shocked to hear this, but DOJ says Russia never got back to them.
 
Those are a lot of "just trying to deflect and obscure" words there, Beco. Hope you stay around for the end of this movie.
 
Back
Top