"Deplorables" said they were unfairly labeled - and then proved they fit the label

[RoryN]

"Deplorables" said they were unfairly labeled - and then proved they fit the label

Over and over again, they come back to Hillary & Dems slighting them as additional reason for voting for 45. Calling people who support him "deplorables" went too far, they cried!

Then, once given some leeway, they proceeded to double down on racism, sexism, homophobia, and proactive stupidity - to an absurd extent. The entire world thinks so, not just us liberals in the U.S. There's no denying it: the history has been written.

So, it's interesting to me to hear warnings from them not to call them a bad name again, for fear of the same consequences. If anything, we should double down on the term next election, because it fits more than ever now.

(Aside from all that, hasn't it been beautiful to hear the anti-politically-correct crowd whining for political correctness the last 2 years?)

 

[Mello_SixtyNine]

A lot of those "deplorables" helped Obama win two terms.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The Republicans are the Liberal party now....get a clue Rory.

 

[Kirkrapine]

The Republicans are the Liberal party now....get a clue Rory.

In American political discourse, that word does not mean what you think it does.

 

[nowisthetime]

A lot of those "deplorables" helped Obama win two terms.

How much is "alot"?

That doesn't change the fact that they are Deplorable, defective human beings.

 

[BotanyBoy]

In American political discourse, that word does not mean what you think it does.

The last 2 generations of American's not getting a basic civics class because progressives HATE that shit and run our education system......doesn't change the meaning of the words buddy.




Liberal =/= socialist no matter how desperate you are to hide behind the significantly less offensive and evil banner of liberalism.

 

[RobDownSouth]

^^^^ Speaking of "deplorable, defective human beings"....

 

[oO00Oo]

*chuckle*

 

[Kirkrapine]

"Deplorable" is really far too kind a word, isn't it?

 

[Kirkrapine]

The last 2 generations of American's not getting a basic civics class because progressives HATE that shit and run our education system......doesn't change the meaning of the words buddy.

The way words are used does change their meaning. Liberal != libertarian.

 

[BotanyBoy]

^^^^ Speaking of "deplorable, defective human beings"....

Not being an anti-USA neo-Marxist doesn't make you deplorable or a defective human being Rob.

Sorry, try again.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Not being an anti-USA neo-Marxist doesn't make you deplorable or a defective human being Rob.

It does in your case.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The way words are used does change their meaning.

No, it doesn't......up is not down, slavery is not freedom and liberalism is not socialism no matter how badly you want to pretend otherwise.

Liberal != libertarian.

No.....but Libertarian does = liberal, "progressives" and Democrats do not.

 

[Busybody18]

Over and over again, they come back to Hillary & Dems slighting them as additional reason for voting for 45. Calling people who support him "deplorables" went too far, they cried!

Then, once given some leeway, they proceeded to double down on racism, sexism, homophobia, and proactive stupidity - to an absurd extent. The entire world thinks so, not just us liberals in the U.S. There's no denying it: the history has been written.

So, it's interesting to me to hear warnings from them not to call them a bad name again, for fear of the same consequences. If anything, we should double down on the term next election, because it fits more than ever now.

(Aside from all that, hasn't it been beautiful to hear the anti-politically-correct crowd whining for political correctness the last 2 years?)

http://gomag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Unhinged-Photo.png

 

[RoryN]

"Deplorable" is really far too kind a word, isn't it?

Without question.

 

[jaF0]

"Deplorable" is really far too kind a word, isn't it?

Without question.

I just call 'em BBs.

 

[Kirkrapine]

No, it doesn't......up is not down, slavery is not freedom and liberalism is not socialism no matter how badly you want to pretend otherwise.

Words are defined by consensus. Up is down if we decide to use the word "up" to mean "down."

 

[BotanyBoy]

Words are defined by consensus.

Yes...and the consensus is that liberalism =/= government administration over the distribution of goods and services and or means of production.


We have a word for that....one you and the others who support such government control are DESPERATE to avoid.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not being an anti-USA neo-Marxist doesn't make you deplorable or a defective human being Rob.

Sorry, try again.

That's the best you got, deplorable demi-gook demagogue?

You got nothin'.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Yes...and the consensus is that liberalism =/= government administration over the distribution of goods and services and or means of production.

That is not the consensus. The consensus is that "liberal" means the kinds of public policies practiced by FDR and LBJ.

 

[nowisthetime]

Over and over again, they come back to Hillary & Dems slighting them as additional reason for voting for 45. Calling people who support him "deplorables" went too far, they cried!

Then, once given some leeway, they proceeded to double down on racism, sexism, homophobia, and proactive stupidity - to an absurd extent. The entire world thinks so, not just us liberals in the U.S. There's no denying it: the history has been written.

So, it's interesting to me to hear warnings from them not to call them a bad name again, for fear of the same consequences. If anything, we should double down on the term next election, because it fits more than ever now.

(Aside from all that, hasn't it been beautiful to hear the anti-politically-correct crowd whining for political correctness the last 2 years?)

I have noticed they bitch about political correctness in order to have free reign in being assholes to folks they find genetically "different" from themselves. They need someone to feel superior to in their sorry ass, insecure lives.


Mango Manchild is an uncouth and lawless loudmouth bully, a great role model for these tools. Too bad decent people, including many of their own family members shun and often shame them.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That's the best you got, deplorable demi-gook demagogue?

You got nothin'.

The guy who's best response is busting out a racial slur says I got nothing.

In a thread about how righteous the left is, the left is the first to get belligerently racist, good job Rob.

I'm sure all the other righteous social justice warriors here on the GB will support you and your racism since it's being applied "correctly" enough for them to give you a pass.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That is not the consensus.

Yes, it is, go look it up in pretty much every reference source available.

The consensus is that "liberal" means the kinds of public policies practiced by FDR and LBJ.

FDR yes.

LBJ no.

Either way by today's standards both were flaming Nazi bigot alt-right scum.

Social liberalism is about public works, infrastructure and civil services promoting positive liberty and being paid for in theory by fair and equitable taxation.

NOT the class warfare through wealth redistribution for the sake of social and economic equity, and certainly not along the intersectional ideological lines that you along with most of the modern US left including the official DNC platform are openly pursuing.

Democrats are not FDR social liberals anymore....the only person you're lying to by trying to pretend they are is yourself, and maybe KeithD who is dumb enough to buy that. Point is only the truly delusional and moronic are buying that steaming pile.

Democrats and the American left are not anywhere in the liberal camp anymore...they packed up and went further left to the socialist(of some variety) camp.

 

[Kirkrapine]

Democrats and the American left are not anywhere in the liberal camp anymore...they packed up and went further left to the socialist(of some variety) camp.

You're hallucinating.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're hallucinating.

You're the one who's pretending the democrats haven't changed since 1936.

You're the one who's hallucinating.

I've already linked to you numerous times the parts of the official platform clearly demonstrating their desire to pursue equity along racial, gender and economic lines and endless promises to fight for wealth redistribution and economic control to make it happen.

I've already linked to you several (D) critters who openly advocate nationalizing major sectors of the US economy from energy to agriculture.

Again, social liberalism is NOT about wealth redistribution and economic control, it's about policy/civil services/infrastructure to promote positive liberty.

The concepts are not even close to the same and never will be, that is why they have different names that are NOT interchangeable synonyms.