Democrats
- Thread starter Cheyenne
- Start date
Lost Cause
It's a wrap!
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Posts
- 30,949
Marxist wannabes.....
When not spewing hatred for people who work hard for what they've earned, or successfully manipulated their stocks to be well off. When not decrying big business for being TOO successful, villifying them into subhuman demons, when they are in reality, employers to the alot of people. When not using divisive wording like, "class/rich/poor/justice/living wage/rightwinger/black/white/big business/and the "theft" of the presidency in 2000." (read your fucking Constitution)
Most believe in the Marxist doctrine of take from the rich, give to those who don't work for it. If they got total control of the system, it would be a repeat of every "October" revolution, or Zimbabwe "justice".
Notice I still am smiling.
When not spewing hatred for people who work hard for what they've earned, or successfully manipulated their stocks to be well off. When not decrying big business for being TOO successful, villifying them into subhuman demons, when they are in reality, employers to the alot of people. When not using divisive wording like, "class/rich/poor/justice/living wage/rightwinger/black/white/big business/and the "theft" of the presidency in 2000." (read your fucking Constitution)
Most believe in the Marxist doctrine of take from the rich, give to those who don't work for it. If they got total control of the system, it would be a repeat of every "October" revolution, or Zimbabwe "justice".
Notice I still am smiling.
sigh
chant mistress
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
- Posts
- 10,248
Re: Marxist wannabes.....
Who are you talking about? That description fits exactly nobody that I know, and I know a lot of Democrats. Good lord, talk about divisive language....
Lost Cause said:When not spewing hatred for people who work hard for what they've earned, or successfully manipulated their stocks to be well off. When not decrying big business for being TOO successful, villifying them into subhuman demons, when they are in reality, employers to the alot of people. When not using divisive wording like, "class/rich/poor/justice/living wage/rightwinger/black/white/big business/and the "theft" of the presidency in 2000." (read your fucking Constitution)
Most believe in the Marxist doctrine of take from the rich, give to those who don't work for it. If they got total control of the system, it would be a repeat of every "October" revolution, or Zimbabwe "justice".
Notice I still am smiling.
Who are you talking about? That description fits exactly nobody that I know, and I know a lot of Democrats. Good lord, talk about divisive language....
Lost Cause
It's a wrap!
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Posts
- 30,949
Speaking of the Dempublicans...
WASHINGTON (AP) Reversing course, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would donate thousands of dollars she received from indicted ImClone founder Sam Waksal to charity.
Clinton and a soft money account set up on her behalf by Democrats received $33,000 from Waksal, campaign finance records show.
Clinton will donate the $7,000 received by her Senate campaign and her political action committee to a charity that has yet to be determined, the New York Democrat's spokeswoman Karen Dunn said Friday.
The remaining $26,000 was donated to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's New York Senate 2000, a soft money account set up on Clinton's behalf.
''She recommends that they do the same,'' Dunn said.
A spokeswoman for the DSCC said Clinton's request was being taken under advisement.
''But our policy in the past has been once its spent its spent,'' Tovah Ravitz said.
On Thursday, Dunn told the New York Post that Clinton ''has no plans to return the money at this time.'' Dunn added that she did not believe that Waksal gave the senator any money this year.
During her 2000 Senate bid, Waksal pumped $26,000 into the soft money account the DSCC set up for Clinton. He also chipped in the maximum allowable $2,000 to her election campaign account. Last year, Waksal donated another $5,000 to Clinton's political action committee, HILLPAC.
Waksal, 54, was arrested in June on charges he secretly advised family members to sell their ImClone stock on Dec. 27 after learning that his biotech company's cancer drug, Erbitux, had been rejected by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA decision was made public two days later.
Earlier this week, Waksal was charged with obstruction of justice and bank fraud in addition to previous securities fraud and perjury charges.
In the past, Clinton has handed over questionable campaign money.
In January, Clinton said she would turn over nearly $8,000 in contributions from Enron and its accountant, Arthur Andersen, to a charitable fund set up to help employees of the bankrupt energy giant.
A spokesman for Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said Friday he would return his own $3,000 contribution from Waksal.
*I guess that makes it right huh?
WASHINGTON (AP) Reversing course, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday she would donate thousands of dollars she received from indicted ImClone founder Sam Waksal to charity.
Clinton and a soft money account set up on her behalf by Democrats received $33,000 from Waksal, campaign finance records show.
Clinton will donate the $7,000 received by her Senate campaign and her political action committee to a charity that has yet to be determined, the New York Democrat's spokeswoman Karen Dunn said Friday.
The remaining $26,000 was donated to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee's New York Senate 2000, a soft money account set up on Clinton's behalf.
''She recommends that they do the same,'' Dunn said.
A spokeswoman for the DSCC said Clinton's request was being taken under advisement.
''But our policy in the past has been once its spent its spent,'' Tovah Ravitz said.
On Thursday, Dunn told the New York Post that Clinton ''has no plans to return the money at this time.'' Dunn added that she did not believe that Waksal gave the senator any money this year.
During her 2000 Senate bid, Waksal pumped $26,000 into the soft money account the DSCC set up for Clinton. He also chipped in the maximum allowable $2,000 to her election campaign account. Last year, Waksal donated another $5,000 to Clinton's political action committee, HILLPAC.
Waksal, 54, was arrested in June on charges he secretly advised family members to sell their ImClone stock on Dec. 27 after learning that his biotech company's cancer drug, Erbitux, had been rejected by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA decision was made public two days later.
Earlier this week, Waksal was charged with obstruction of justice and bank fraud in addition to previous securities fraud and perjury charges.
In the past, Clinton has handed over questionable campaign money.
In January, Clinton said she would turn over nearly $8,000 in contributions from Enron and its accountant, Arthur Andersen, to a charitable fund set up to help employees of the bankrupt energy giant.
A spokesman for Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said Friday he would return his own $3,000 contribution from Waksal.
*I guess that makes it right huh?
The most humorous part of it is Democrats scream you're bashing them if you merely report the truth of their words and actions.
Granted it doesn't fit many of the rank and file Democrats but it certainly very accurately applies to the most prominent leaders whose stock in trade is demagoguery and age/class/racial/ethnic divisiveness. Just look at the campaign ads they run about starving kids, "stealing" old peoples' Social Security, the truck and chains ad alluding to the murder of James Burd (sp?), et al. Remember Algore's campaign statement that Bush's remark about being a Constitutionalist meant he (Bush) wanted to revert to the days when a black counted as 3/5 of a person? Divisive? Nah, I guess not. I probably just don't understand the language they use, huh? My fault for having English as my only language.
G
Guest
Guest
Re: Marxist wannabes.....
Can we say Enron, Worldcom, Qwest, Adelphia, ad infinitum? Keep on defending these slimeballs. Your gullibility is showing in spades. I guess the republican/libertarian hacks have truly earned their pay. Then again maybe not. How tough can it be to subvert the minds of those that lack any ability at critical thought?
Marxism is about the fair distribution of the proceeds from a workers efforts. If a company does well it isn't just because some "suit" decreed that it would be so. It comes from the combined efforts of all involved. Especially those who actually perform the labor. How many cars does the CEO of Ford make? What happens if no one makes the cars? Yet he/she and their ilk continually reward themselves with exorbitant salaries, bonuses, loans that are conveniently forgiven, stock options etc even when, as in the case of Ford, the company goes to hell in a handbasket.
Capitalism's worst enemy isn't the Socialist/Marxist. They are sufficiently marginalized by the demonization and misunderstanding of their true tenets. Most people just react to those words based on their incomplete understanding of what the really mean. Capitalism's true enemy is it's own greed and avarice and it's total lack of any ethical conduct today.
Why should a wealthy man hold political office? When he can own the person who holds that office?
Much tidier that way you know. Keeps his hands clean and gives him a scapegoat.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Money is power. Wealth is power. And we can all see the results of it's ability to corrupt.
Fianlly, what is wrong with a living wage? The right is always harping incessantly on about how everyone should work hard to make their living. But they don't want that work to pay enough to make a living. Make up your feeble minds. All work is valuable. If it wasn't it wouldn't be done.
Summed up the mantra of the right wing capitalist should read. We want everyone to work but we don't want to pay for it. It is the right that engages in class warfare. Break out a sociology text sometime and do some critical reading. There is a growing segment of the population that is barely making ends meet no matter how hard they work and struggle. We are tired of working our asses off and seeing a very few individuals taking all the profits of that work for themselves and leaving bankrupt shells of corporations for the investors and the employees. Most of the time unethically and sometimes illegally. They skirt the law and when they are caught rarely do they do any real penance. A few years in a posh prison and then back home to their riches. Crime does pay. For the wealthy.
Lost Cause said:When not spewing hatred for people who work hard for what they've earned, or successfully manipulated their stocks to be well off. When not decrying big business for being TOO successful, villifying them into subhuman demons, when they are in reality, employers to the alot of people. When not using divisive wording like, "class/rich/poor/justice/living wage/rightwinger/black/white/big business/and the "theft" of the presidency in 2000." (read your fucking Constitution)
Most believe in the Marxist doctrine of take from the rich, give to those who don't work for it. If they got total control of the system, it would be a repeat of every "October" revolution, or Zimbabwe "justice".
Notice I still am smiling.
Can we say Enron, Worldcom, Qwest, Adelphia, ad infinitum? Keep on defending these slimeballs. Your gullibility is showing in spades. I guess the republican/libertarian hacks have truly earned their pay. Then again maybe not. How tough can it be to subvert the minds of those that lack any ability at critical thought?
Marxism is about the fair distribution of the proceeds from a workers efforts. If a company does well it isn't just because some "suit" decreed that it would be so. It comes from the combined efforts of all involved. Especially those who actually perform the labor. How many cars does the CEO of Ford make? What happens if no one makes the cars? Yet he/she and their ilk continually reward themselves with exorbitant salaries, bonuses, loans that are conveniently forgiven, stock options etc even when, as in the case of Ford, the company goes to hell in a handbasket.
Capitalism's worst enemy isn't the Socialist/Marxist. They are sufficiently marginalized by the demonization and misunderstanding of their true tenets. Most people just react to those words based on their incomplete understanding of what the really mean. Capitalism's true enemy is it's own greed and avarice and it's total lack of any ethical conduct today.
Why should a wealthy man hold political office? When he can own the person who holds that office?
Much tidier that way you know. Keeps his hands clean and gives him a scapegoat.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Money is power. Wealth is power. And we can all see the results of it's ability to corrupt.
Fianlly, what is wrong with a living wage? The right is always harping incessantly on about how everyone should work hard to make their living. But they don't want that work to pay enough to make a living. Make up your feeble minds. All work is valuable. If it wasn't it wouldn't be done.
Summed up the mantra of the right wing capitalist should read. We want everyone to work but we don't want to pay for it. It is the right that engages in class warfare. Break out a sociology text sometime and do some critical reading. There is a growing segment of the population that is barely making ends meet no matter how hard they work and struggle. We are tired of working our asses off and seeing a very few individuals taking all the profits of that work for themselves and leaving bankrupt shells of corporations for the investors and the employees. Most of the time unethically and sometimes illegally. They skirt the law and when they are caught rarely do they do any real penance. A few years in a posh prison and then back home to their riches. Crime does pay. For the wealthy.
G
Guest
Guest
Oh, LeftISTS. Stupid eyesight.
And Lost cause, Marxist would never post like that.
And Lost cause, Marxist would never post like that.
sexy-girl
sacrilegious
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2001
- Posts
- 19,584
sigh said:
And right, in Latin, is 'dextrous'. Regardless of the political meanings of the words, is it any surprise that left handed people were once considered witches and that well into the mid-twentieth century there was a concentrated effort to teach left-handed children to be right-handed?
Speaking of which; Never, I'm sure we can cure that lesbian thing. The first step is recognizing that you have a problem....
Okay, back to the thread. Sorry, I'm just in a hijacking mood tonight, I guess.
I get it
the stupidity of the people who accused people being witches because they were left handed is about equal with saying lesbians have a mental health problem
i think you did a nice job of comparing the two sigh
... especially because i think another sign of being a witch was being a lesbian 
Cheyenne
Ms. Smarty Pantsless
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2000
- Posts
- 59,556
Sandia said:
Now there's a generalization if I ever heard one!
Sticking with your logic, have you met clitfucker yet? Yup, a hard worker there. Drives his mom to and from work every day so she can support him! Yup, what a tough job.
In other words, you just insulted quite a few of us here. Don't presume to tell me how hard I don't work. I'll match my work ethic against yours any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
sunstruck said:
More than that, we have anti-microbal, disinfectant soap. I note that both democrats and republicans shake with their right hands.
I also note that once you move far right enough, you pop up on the left and vice versa. It is a very interesting thing. Political ideology is circular, not linear.
