cheerful_deviant
Head of the Flock
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
- Posts
- 10,487
Is 'None of the Above' an option?
No, seriously.
No, seriously.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's got my vote. Every election year I wish more strongly that the Monster Raving Loony Party would start up a US wing.
Paul '08
Not a chance, it won't happen.
Irrevelant, regarding support.
I'm going to write in John Smith, and let the elections people figure out which one I mean.
I'm going to write in John Smith, and let the elections people figure out which one I mean.
Beautiful. I think I'll do the same thing with Caligula.![]()
ooh, I like that!
I'm stealing it.![]()
Do you think it's too late to launch a nationwide campaign?
I need to get out my copy of the Constitution. Does it actually require that the president be alive?![]()
It is in Nevada for any statewide contest on the ballot -- which includes the presidential ballot.Is 'None of the Above' an option?
No, seriously.![]()
Starkkers, I vote when there's a choice worth voting for -- or against. The problem is that I'm registered as an Independent Voter and Nevada went from closed primaries to party caucuses I don't get much say in who will be on the ballot. Far too often, the choices I'm given are The Devil, The Deep Blue Sea, "Those Other Two Sure Look Good In Comparison To Me" and None of The Above. Three guesses which I vote for.And they wonder why so few people actually vote.
Is 'None of the Above' an option?
No, seriously.![]()
Well you did say "seriously"... so let us be serious for a minute.
This primary thing is a process. It is a vastly better process than it used to be but is still plagued by silly rules, caucuses, etc.. (Am I the only one who thinks that it is outrageous that primary voters in Michigan and elsewhere were disenfranchised because the local party moved the date of their primary up a few weeks in the calendar? Utterly ridiculous!)
And so the process winds it's way along until we have two major candidates, whose principal virtue is not having said anything specific so as not to piss anyone off.
Having voted these people into being candidates.. we then have the grand American tradition of trashing the candidates and our lack of a valid "choice"... We did have choices.... "we" just didn't choose them.
Now I have no idea why someone would want to be a serious candidate for President. I sure as hell would not, even if I thought someone other than my Mother would vote for me. I not only smoked dope, I inhaled it and went back for more. Oh... and I write disgusting, perverted, immoral porn (or at least I try to). But we do have serious people who think that they can really help the country by being President.
I don't know.... but it just seems to me that at least choosing between tweedledee and tweedledum contributes something and I will continue to do it. I will admit that I voted for Eldridge Cleaver in 1968 because I thought the pretty obvious central issue at the time was the war and both candidates liked it and I did not. Not only was Eldridge against the war... .he promised to rename the President's residence to "The Black House"... How could I not vote for him? Unfortunately, he didn't win.
On a pragmatic level, I like to encourage others not to vote or vote for Mickey Mouse (he may actually be a candidate in Florida). It makes my vote count for more…in a statistical kind of way. And maybe Tweedledum will invite me to the Inaugural Ball… before things start to go down hill.
Okay... I guess the serious moment is over.
No, it's not...
Was it not in the meaningless Michigan primary that "None of the above" got more votes than the "winner" Hillary? I guess you can vote “None of the Above” and I encourage you to do it.
Serious moment truly over.
-KC
Was it not in the meaningless Michigan primary that "None of the above" got more votes than the "winner" Hillary? I guess you can vote “None of the Above” and I encourage you to do it.