Dearborn: Muslim Company Forcing Christian Employees To Wear Headscarfs

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
DEARBORN: MUSLIM COMPANY FORCING CHRISTIAN EMPLOYEES TO WEAR HEADSCARFS


T
muslimchristianhijabA Muslim-owned arts-and-crafts store in Dearborn, Michigan is forcing its female Christian employees to wear traditional Islamic headscarves while on the job.

According to local reports, Khilāf Krafts began requiring its eight female employees to wear hijabs last week, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, which gave religious rights to family-owned businesses.

Although five women working for the company are Muslims, the remaining three are practicing Christians. The company has threatened to fire any Christian woman who does not comply.

“My boss came in last Tuesday with a Koran in his hand and told us we were dressed like harlots,” says Karen Anderson, 28, a five year veteran of the company. “He gave us each a hijab and said if we didn’t wear it we’d be unemployed.

“I’m a strong believer in Jesus Christ. But my husband passed a few years ago and I need this job to support my kids. I don’t really have a choice. I have to wear it.”

The Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the Hobby Lobby case allowed the Christian-owned retail chain to opt out of a federal law requiring employers to give female employees contraceptive coverage.

Although praised by conservative Christians, liberals fret that the decision will allow companies with devout owners of any faith to opt out of American laws they simply don’t like.

In her dissent Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed similar fears: “Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be ‘perceived as favoring one religion over another,’ … The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.” she wrote.

Khilāf Krafts’ new policy has attracted outrage from women’s rights groups and Christian churches around the country. However, owner Khaleed El-Helani says he’s just a business owner practicing his faith.

“If Hobby Lobby can impose its religious beliefs on its employees, why can’t we?” he demands. “Are Christian business owners somehow more important than Muslim business owners?

“I read through the entire Supreme Court decision. I don’t really see what the problem is here. I’m a small, closely held business. I have devout religious beliefs. Why should I be forced to employ people if it violates my religion?”

El-Helani also says he plans on cutting off his employees’ hands if he catches them stealing, in accordance with Islamic law.

“This is what religious freedom looks like,” he explains. “Thanks John Roberts!”
 
Why would any body in their right mind want to work there if they were not moose limbs?
 
Why would any body in their right mind want to work there if they were not moose limbs?

“My boss came in last Tuesday with a Koran in his hand and told us we were dressed like harlots,” says Karen Anderson, 28, a five year veteran of the company. “He gave us each a hijab and said if we didn’t wear it we’d be unemployed.

“I’m a strong believer in Jesus Christ. But my husband passed a few years ago and I need this job to support my kids. I don’t really have a choice. I have to wear it.”
 
wow, you are stupid ....

when people came to America they assimilated in ... not the retarded muslims

why are so fucking retarded?

Assimilated in what? Christianity?

You never studied did you?

But you didn't answer the question...why do you hate religious freedom so much?
 
Assimilated in what? Christianity?

You never studied did you?

But you didn't answer the question...why do you hate religious freedom so much?



wow, do you try to be stupid? really, you can't be this fucking stupid, can you?
 
wow, do you try to be stupid? really, you can't be this fucking stupid, can you?

Explain...or are you really just a "Yer stewpid!" one trick pony??

Also why do you hate religious freedom so much?
 
Last edited:
“My boss came in last Tuesday with a Koran in his hand and told us we were dressed like harlots,” says Karen Anderson, 28, a five year veteran of the company. “He gave us each a hijab and said if we didn’t wear it we’d be unemployed.

“I’m a strong believer in Jesus Christ. But my husband passed a few years ago and I need this job to support my kids. I don’t really have a choice. I have to wear it.”

I wonder what would happen if each employee of Hobby Lobby or similar place were required to wear a crucifix. :confused: How long do you think that requirement would last?
 
I wonder what would happen if each employee of Hobby Lobby or similar place were required to wear a crucifix. :confused: How long do you think that requirement would last?

why arent MUSLIM baleries AXED to BAKE a cake?


:cool:
 
there is a reason I called teh Indiana law

MUSLIM PROTECTION ACT
 
I wonder what would happen if each employee of Hobby Lobby or similar place were required to wear a crucifix. :confused: How long do you think that requirement would last?

You won the court battle guy....private, closely held companies can now cram as much religion up the ass of their employees that they want.

Isn't that what you wanted?

Is that not what the Hobby Lobby case was about?

Or are you just pissed off because once again you realize Christians ain't the only religious folks in this country???
 
You won the court battle guy....private, closely held companies can now cram as much religion up the ass of their employees that they want.

Isn't that what you wanted?

Is that not what the Hobby Lobby case was about?

Or are you just pissed off because once again you realize Christians ain't the only religious folks in this country???

No, it wasn't. The HL case said the company could not be compelled to do something against their religious tenets. In the case on this thread, the employees of a company are being ordered to follow the tenets of the religion of the owner, which is a violation of the employees' rights. Making each of those employees wear a crucifix would be an even more egregious violation of those rights.
 
No, it wasn't. The HL case said the company could not be compelled to do something against their religious tenets.

You must have no concept of how legally BROAD that wording is......

Yes that's exactly what HL case was...

Why do you think everyone was looking at the RW going "I hope you morons understand the can of worms you're opening with this bullshit.." ? Or did you just write that up as Chrstchun hatin libuhurl mumbo jumbo?? :confused: Of course you did!!

And I'm loving it every bit as much as when the pagans, jedi, satanist, moozlems and everyone else showed up to push their religious materials in FL schools. They seriously thought it was a 100% christian state.

Lucky for them FL is a bunch of fuck holes and decided to turn it into "Just kidding everyone else! Fruck religious freedom, this is now a legal privilege only Christians and Christian approved religions get to enjoy! " so much love for religious freedom from the RW....as long as it's Christian/jew.

In the case on this thread, the employees of a company are being ordered to follow the tenets of the religion of the owner, which is a violation of the employees' rights. Making each of those employees wear a crucifix would be an even more egregious violation of those rights.

Keep telling yourself that....but you can't have it both ways. Either small privately held companies can institute their religion into company policy with or they cannot.

As much as I know you and the other RW Christians who think Christian tyrannical rule = religious freedom it's just not how things work in this country. If you can do it so can the moozlems...Buddhist....pagans....druids...atheist....Jedi...Big JuJu worshipers...etc.

Otherwise you're just a tyrannical Christian nut job....like FL and some other REALLY special red states LOL
 
Last edited:
we all know, that you are a retard




You must have no concept of how legally BROAD that wording is......

Yes that's exactly what HL case was...

Why do you think everyone was looking at the RW going "I hope you morons understand the can of worms you're opening with this bullshit.." ? Or did you just write that up as Chrstchun hatin libuhurl mumbo jumbo?? :confused: Of course you did!!

And I'm loving it every bit as much as when the pagans, jedi, satanist, moozlems and everyone else showed up to push their religious materials in FL schools. They seriously thought it was a 100% christian state.

Lucky for them FL is a bunch of fuck holes and decided to turn it into "Just kidding everyone else! Fruck religious freedom, this is now a legal privilege only Christians and Christian approved religions get to enjoy! " so much love for religious freedom from the RW....as long as it's Christian/jew.



Keep telling yourself that....but you can't have it both ways. Either small privately held companies can institute their religion into company policy with or they cannot.

As much as I know you and the other RW Christians who think Christian tyrannical rule = religious freedom it's just not how things work in this country. If you can do it so can the moozlems...Buddhist....pagans....druids...atheist....Jedi...Big JuJu worshipers...etc.

Otherwise you're just a tyrannical Christian nut job....like FL and some other REALLY special red states LOL
 
Its called freedom, BusyB.

The right to start a business and operate according to one's values and principles is not only a human right, but the very basis of what America is supposed to be.

Work somewhere else if you don't like it.
 
Its called freedom, BusyB.

The right to start a business and operate according to one's values and principles is not only a human right, but the very basis of what America is supposed to be.

Work somewhere else if you don't like it.

Shockingly the most honest, consistent, legitimately fair conservatives on the subject so far as lit is concerned, and most conservatives in general for that matter....kudos RR.
 
Shockingly the most honest, consistent, legitimately fair conservatives on the subject so far as lit is concerned, and most conservatives in general for that matter....kudos RR.

Well, I usually consider this to be a site for hostile, rude, insults, but thanks. Now, let's get back to being rude and insulting.
 
You must have no concept of how legally BROAD that wording is......

Yes that's exactly what HL case was...

Why do you think everyone was looking at the RW going "I hope you morons understand the can of worms you're opening with this bullshit.." ? Or did you just write that up as Chrstchun hatin libuhurl mumbo jumbo?? :confused: Of course you did!!

And I'm loving it every bit as much as when the pagans, jedi, satanist, moozlems and everyone else showed up to push their religious materials in FL schools. They seriously thought it was a 100% christian state.

Lucky for them FL is a bunch of fuck holes and decided to turn it into "Just kidding everyone else! Fruck religious freedom, this is now a legal privilege only Christians and Christian approved religions get to enjoy! " so much love for religious freedom from the RW....as long as it's Christian/jew.



Keep telling yourself that....but you can't have it both ways. Either small privately held companies can institute their religion into company policy with or they cannot.

As much as I know you and the other RW Christians who think Christian tyrannical rule = religious freedom it's just not how things work in this country. If you can do it so can the moozlems...Buddhist....pagans....druids...atheist....Jedi...Big JuJu worshipers...etc.

Otherwise you're just a tyrannical Christian nut job....like FL and some other REALLY special red states LOL

I don't really call myself a Christian at all. If I were to describe my religious beliefs, agnostic comes closer than anything else. However, I believe people are entitled to their religious beliefs and should not be required to violate them. If I were a baker or florist or caterer or photographer or videographer, I would have no problems providing my services to a gay couple getting married. However, I believe another person should not be required to provide those services if they are contrary to that person's beliefs.

Both a hijab and a crucifix are emblems of certain faiths, and I don't believe employees should be compelled to wear or carry them against their wills.
 
Well, I usually consider this to be a site for hostile, rude, insults, but thanks. Now, let's get back to being rude and insulting.

I try to be fair.....now go fuck yerself. :cool:


Doesn't matter...same concept.

Christians can cram their religion up everyones ass under penalty of law......but not anyone else.

Christians can proselytize at public schools...but pitch a bitch fit when other religions do the same fucking thing.

The retards don't know what the fuck they want and are to cowardly to just own up to their desires for a Christian theocracy for shame after all the bull shitting about freedom of religion when they knew damn well they don't give a fuck about freedom of religion.

I don't really call myself a Christian at all. If I were to describe my religious beliefs, agnostic comes closer than anything else. However, I believe people are entitled to their religious beliefs and should not be required to violate them.

Even when they shit on other people....nice. Let's just do whatever the fuck we want and claim "religious freedom!!" murder? SACRIFICE TO MY GOD! NOT murder...

Oh I forget...that only extends to Christians. :rolleyes:

If I were a baker or florist or caterer or photographer or videographer, I would have no problems providing my services to a gay couple getting married. However, I believe another person should not be required to provide those services if they are contrary to that person's beliefs.

Then be honest and push to repeal anti-discrimination laws....the push for a "because FREEDUMB OF RELIGION!!! but really just Jesus and fuck everyone else" bullshit cowardice is getting old. You folks on the right pushing that garbage are fucking liars.....you don't give a fuck about freedom of religion you just want a "fuck gay people because reasons" law.

Both a hijab and a crucifix are emblems of certain faiths, and I don't believe employees should be compelled to wear or carry them against their wills.

Tough shit...Republicans won, bidniss owners religion> rights of employees and consumers. It couldn't be anymore RW typical.
 
Last edited:
Don't any of you find this to be a bit hypocritical?

This muslim business owner can enforce this dress code based on his religious beliefs up to and including dismissing employees if they don't comply and no one protests.

Yet, if say a catholic business owner required his employees to were some sort of clothing that fall within the tenants of catholic doctrine there wouldn't be folks out front screaming about discrimination?

Don't any of you find that sort of ironic?
 
Don't any of you find this to be a bit hypocritical?

This muslim business owner can enforce this dress code based on his religious beliefs up to and including dismissing employees if they don't comply and no one protests.

Except the majority of the RW....because moozlem.

And in case your missed the thread or just can't read it's a bunch of RW'ers totally fucking outraged about this fake story of religious freedom in M'uricuh.....which was perfect for ID'ing the RW'ers who don't really give a fuck about religious freedom but are really out on an agenda for a Christian theocracy in the US.

Yet, if say a catholic business owner required his employees to were some sort of clothing that fall within the tenants of catholic doctrine there wouldn't be folks out front screaming about discrimination?

Don't any of you find that sort of ironic?

You've lost your fucking shit you theocon whackadoodle.....Christians push their religious bullshit on people all the fucking time, it's a constant battle with them in the SCOTUS to keep the Bible and Jeezuz out of the law.

Oh that's right...you're one of those "Christian legal privileges/exceptions and fuck everyone else = Religious freedom" type of RW'ers aren't ya?

I can't believe of all the RW whackies renard_ruse is the ONLY one who's consistent about religious freedom. Though I'm not surprised.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top