Dear America: Our country is fucked.

He could get brokered out and she could get indicted...

:eek:

Then who knows what our choices would be?

Mitt, Trump (3rd party) and Bernie?
 
Can you imagine a Bernie vs. Trump debate?

I don't even want to think about it.
 
The one on the far left or the one to his right?


:D :D :D

Bubba was a lying, perjuring, disbarred sexual predator.

Arafat was a murdering terrorist who embezzled billions from his own miserable people.

I guess that makes them equals. :D
 
Bill and Hillary have succeeded in establishing the largest graft-laundering operation in the history of our nation.

Tammany Hall? Tea Pot Dome? The Daley Machine?

Arafat should have been so good...

He was simply a thief.
 
Let's not forget the nukes that went to North Korea.

I love how Libs say he was a great president.

Produced by Jimmy Carter!

:cool:




Then he bombed the shit out of Christians AND NEVER PRODUCED ONE MASS GRAVE!!!
 
Really only Trump is truly terrible. Hillary is just status quo and at the end of the day nothing wrong with that. It's just not progress.
 
Really only Trump is truly terrible. Hillary is just status quo and at the end of the day nothing wrong with that. It's just not progress.

Not really sure if there is nothing wrong with status quo.......

Pretty sure M'uricuh at large is tired of being Goldman Sachs slave bitch and with good reason.
 
Not really sure if there is nothing wrong with status quo.......

Pretty sure M'uricuh at large is tired of being Goldman Sachs slave bitch and with good reason.

I think Scalia's death probably did more to upset the status quo than anything in the past 20 years.

Scalia's death signals the end of judicial activism by the conservative faction on the Supreme Court. They no longer have the votes.

His replacement is going to either a moderate or a liberal, there is simply no way either President Obama or President Clinton (or even, God forbid, President Trump) will nominate a rabid ultraconservative Scalia clone as a replacement. It's the biggest change in Supreme Court direction since Thurgood Marshall decided to abruptly quit (which paved the way for Clarence Thomas).

Republicans have relied upon the Supreme Court to legislate from the bench to appease the social conservative factions over the past two decades, which frees up conservatives in Congress to do the Koch brothers (and Goldman Sachs) bidding.
 
I think Scalia's death probably did more to upset the status quo than anything in the past 20 years.

Scalia's death signals the end of judicial activism by the conservative faction on the Supreme Court. They no longer have the votes.

His replacement is going to either a moderate or a liberal, there is simply no way either President Obama or President Clinton (or even, God forbid, President Trump) will nominate a rabid ultraconservative Scalia clone as a replacement. It's the biggest change in Supreme Court direction since Thurgood Marshall decided to abruptly quit (which paved the way for Clarence Thomas).

Republicans have relied upon the Supreme Court to legislate from the bench to appease the social conservative factions over the past two decades, which frees up conservatives in Congress to do the Koch brothers (and Goldman Sachs) bidding.

Spot on.
 
I think Scalia's death probably did more to upset the status quo than anything in the past 20 years.

Scalia's death signals the end of judicial activism by the conservative faction on the Supreme Court. They no longer have the votes.

His replacement is going to either a moderate or a liberal, there is simply no way either President Obama or President Clinton (or even, God forbid, President Trump) will nominate a rabid ultraconservative Scalia clone as a replacement. It's the biggest change in Supreme Court direction since Thurgood Marshall decided to abruptly quit (which paved the way for Clarence Thomas).

Republicans have relied upon the Supreme Court to legislate from the bench to appease the social conservative factions over the past two decades, which frees up conservatives in Congress to do the Koch brothers (and Goldman Sachs) bidding.

I agree.....and there is no doubt that is the single largest change up for bid with this election.

I was speaking more to the 'big picture' with regard to the WH/POTUS.

Besides the rhetoric and various companies/industries they represent what's the difference between an establishment Rethuglican or Democrap? What makes the Lockheed Martin/Halliburton/Wall St. employee (R) objectively more or less than a Pfizer/Google/Wall St. employee (D)?

At what point do we finally start putting people in office who didn't take a billion bucks from these fuckers? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top