Daily sex makes for healthier sperm . . .

certain also, that this makes for healthier husbands, and possibly wives. Surely the shared intimacy brings more will to live than having a pet - which has been documented as adding to lifespan?

However, deferring to the original post - is it the lividity of the spermatazoa which is of concern here?

:)
 
At least according to this report. It certainly makes for happier husbands . . . :D

I read a similar study before we conceived our kids. Happy husband, indeed.

It takes thirty days to grow healthy swimmers, and if you don't clean out the lines often, you're left with the day-olds.

So to speak.
 
Sperm live 24-48 hours and are absorbed by the body. So sex every day is irrelevant.

But what is significant is the ejaculate. Between 1940 and 1990 the volume of semen per ejacualtion decreased by 50% as did the number of sperm per ejaculation.

The male body seems to sense that fucking women with birth control is a waste of stuff.

You cant fool Mother Nature.
 
At least according to this report. It certainly makes for happier husbands . . . :D

I'd say that daily orgasm (FAR different than daily "sex") makes for healthier people in general. I know that I function better when I've had mine.

Speaking of which, I believe it's time to self-medicate...
 
I mentioned this in another thread - the Sperm is not "reabsorbed" JBJ, not all of it - the testes more or less continually produce it, excess may be reabsorbed, but a certain amount of it stays, and that sperm degrades.

It has to do with motility, as I understand it at the moment, i.e., only one spermatozoa is required for fertilization, but it takes the whole bunch to break down the protective covering of the egg (there's a metaphor for you).

The damaged sperm are "laggards", they fall out before they get to the egg or too late to help out, the shell is not broken down enough to allow the one spermatozoa to connect with the object of his desires.

And falling sperm counts are not the result of noetic processes there JBJ, that's magical thinking, this is biology - the current best theory is that it's the result oestradiols and other pollutants in the water supply.
 
I'd say that daily orgasm (FAR different than daily "sex") makes for healthier people in general. I know that I function better when I've had mine.

Speaking of which, I believe it's time to self-medicate...

Exactly. It's all about the "O"! :cool:

'Sides, if I need sperm, I'll go out and buy a bottle of it, like any other self-respecting queer chick! :D
 
Exactly. It's all about the "O"! :cool:

'Sides, if I need sperm, I'll go out and buy a bottle of it, like any other self-respecting queer chick! :D

True, true, but I'd rather have mine with someone other than Rosie Palm and her five daughters!
 
"Semen makes women less depressed!" I know, it sounds like a title only a man could think up, but really I think I read a study and that was the title. I don't have time to look for it, but the gist of the study was done by psychologists. It measured using a depression inventory test and took four relationship groups: bareback couples, couples on the pill, condom couples, and lesbian couples. It turned out that the bareback couples were less likely to report symptoms of depression.

The theory is the makeup of semen, amino acids, sugar, cholesterol, hormones, enzymes, etc. has a positive effect on a women as the hormones are absorbed through the walls of the vagina.

A follow up study, one without a shocking title, measured the happiness of women who were having regular sex: bareback and condom users. Then, stopped having sex. The condom users showed very little decline in happiness. The bareback group showed a significant drop.

I do realize that there are a million other things that makes depression/happiness exist. I just thought this was interesting, and fit into healthy sperm.

And for those interested - assiduous condom users scored the same as lesbians. Hey, I didn't do the study! :)
 
Back
Top