D-bags, I Guess Blue Lives Matter Now

[score_keeper]

Or do they only matter when they're schilling for Pelosi?

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/capitol-riot-officers-ap-img.jpg?scale=896&compress=80

 

[ll74]

Or do they only matter when they're schilling for Pelosi?

https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/capitol-riot-officers-ap-img.jpg?scale=896&compress=80

I was told that these guys lied in their testimony because of BLM. Maybe my foxnews channel hasn't been updated to the latest version

 

[Bud_Spencer]

It's just like black lives...they only matter when they're politically useful.

 

[ll74]

It's just like black lives...they only matter when they're politically useful.

Still waiting for the testimony which disputes theirs.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Still waiting for the testimony which disputes theirs.

Ha-ha, you think Granny Ricktus would allow anyone with a contrary story to testify? Do you really imagine that any of the mouth-breathing Trump-haters hand-picked for this show trial would call such a person?

 

[ll74]

Ha-ha, you think Granny Ricktus would allow anyone with a contrary story to testify? Do you really imagine that any of the mouth-breathing Trump-haters hand-picked for this show trial would call such a person?

There has been previous testimony outside of this committee.....previous interviews with other police members. Is your assertion that no other police officer there that day offering up different and conflicting accounts exist because of Pelosi somehow covering that up from Jan 6 till now?

If so, that's a completely different assertion, and I certainly would be interested in supporting evidence of that.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

There has been previous testimony outside of this committee.....previous interviews with other police members. Is your assertion that no other police officer there that day offering up different and conflicting accounts exist because of Pelosi somehow covering that up from Jan 6 till now?

If so, that's a completely different assertion, and I certainly would be interested in supporting evidence of that.

Oh, I'm sure that their tales of tussling with the protestors are true, at least from their perspective. Remove all the adjectives, and that's essentially what went on. If you are going to be traumatized by that, you're in the wrong line of work.

What you won't hear, and don't really need to because video records of it exist, is all the officers that encountered protestors simply walking around, taking selfies or shouting slogans peacefully, harming no one. And that was the vast majority of those who entered the Capitol, not even mentioning the hundreds of thousands that did not.

As I said, it was a mostly-peaceful protest.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Oh, I'm sure that their tales of tussling with the protestors are true, .

True>? You question the truth....Are you blind????

Of course it is true, there is hours and hours of video evidence of protesters clashing with the Police that day....

 

[Bud_Spencer]

True>? You question the truth....Are you blind????

Of course it is true, there is hours and hours of video evidence of protesters clashing with the Police that day....

Okay, so? There are thousands of hours of protestors interacting peacefully with those same police. You're not going to be allowed to see that in this show trial, however. In fact, you can't see it at all because Pelosi has it under lock and key...it doesn't support her twisted narrative.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Okay, so? There are thousands of hours of protestors interacting peacefully with those same police. You're not going to be allowed to see that in this show trial, however. In fact, you can't see it at all because Pelosi has it under lock and key...it doesn't support her twisted narrative.

Well, I have not seen hours and hours of protesters interacting with the police. Feel free to link those protesters and police video's....

I have seen video of protesters wandering around inside the building, after they got past the outside perimeter security. Doing pretty much nothing but wondering.

I suspect they were wondering, because they were not really sure what they doing once they got past the security. After all not every single person who went, had a plan. Which is why a lot of the charges against the "sheep" are just minor trespass charges.

No, what this committee is looking for,is the instigators, and the violent few, who had other plans that day.

Also, we could take your post above, move it below, and do this.....making it virtually true....


Okay, so? There are thousands of hours of BLM protesters interacting peacefully with those same police. Republicans are not going to be allowed to see that In fact, you can't see it at all on Conservative media because Foxnews and the rest of the conservative media has it under lock and key...it doesn't support their twisted narrative.[/QUOTE]

 

[ll74]

Oh, I'm sure that their tales of tussling with the protestors are true, at least from their perspective. Remove all the adjectives, and that's essentially what went on. If you are going to be traumatized by that, you're in the wrong line of work.

What you won't hear, and don't really need to because video records of it exist, is all the officers that encountered protestors simply walking around, taking selfies or shouting slogans peacefully, harming no one. And that was the vast majority of those who entered the Capitol, not even mentioning the hundreds of thousands that did not.

As I said, it was a mostly-peaceful protest.

Right - but it's not about being traumatized because people called you names.

People actively were violent. People actively asserted that they wanted to take his weapon and use it on him. Is that testimony false? That's the part that needs to be looked into closer and should not be dismissed as "activist" BS. Because there are indications from video released that there was coordination to steal shields from the police and move it into certain positions.

As I said as well, every single person in the building was trespassing (i.e. breaking the law)

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Well, I have not seen hours and hours of protesters interacting with the police. Feel free to link those protesters and police video's....

I have seen video of protesters wandering around inside the building, after they got past the outside perimeter security. Doing pretty much nothing but wondering.

I suspect they were wondering, because they were not really sure what they doing once they got past the security. After all not every single person who went, had a plan. Which is why a lot of the charges against the "sheep" are just minor trespass charges.

No, what this committee is looking for,is the instigators, and the violent few, who had other plans that day.

Also, we could take your post above, move it below, and do this.....making it virtually true....


Okay, so? There are thousands of hours of BLM protesters interacting peacefully with those same police. Republicans are not going to be allowed to see that In fact, you can't see it at all on Conservative media because Foxnews and the rest of the conservative media has it under lock and key...it doesn't support their twisted narrative.

[/QUOTE]

There are 14,000 hours of video Pelosi isn't releasing. Why?

Here are a few:

https://youtu.be/cE7terSDSTo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuJBJRZSpCc

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Right - but it's not about being traumatized because people called you names.

People actively were violent. People actively asserted that they wanted to take his weapon and use it on him. Is that testimony false? That's the part that needs to be looked into closer and should not be dismissed as "activist" BS. Because there are indications from video released that there was coordination to steal shields from the police and move it into certain positions.

As I said as well, every single person in the building was trespassing (i.e. breaking the law)

Sounds like something that requires seven months of solitary confinement without even being charged, no?

Meanwhile, charged murders are being released with ankle monitors in NY.

 

[ll74]

Sounds like something that requires seven months of solitary confinement without even being charged, no?

Meanwhile, charged murders are being released with ankle monitors in NY.

Unrelated to the investigation.

Maybe address that in the prosecution topics.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Unrelated to the investigation.

Maybe address that in the prosecution topics.

Maybe you should read the Eighth Amendment. Or is that a relic of white supremacy, too?

 

[ll74]

Maybe you should read the Eighth Amendment. Or is that a relic of white supremacy, too?

Can you explain how their prosecution or due process by the DoJ helps an investigation determine what led to the events of Jan 6 or, as relevant to this post, how it's relevant to the police officers' testimony?

 

[pecksniff]

Okay, so? There are thousands of hours of protestors interacting peacefully with those same police. You're not going to be allowed to see that in this show trial, however. In fact, you can't see it at all because Pelosi has it under lock and key...it doesn't support her twisted narrative.

Then how do you know it?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Can you explain how their prosecution or due process by the DoJ helps an investigation determine what led to the events of Jan 6 or, as relevant to this post, how it's relevant to the police officers' testimony?

The fact is that the DOJ is making pre-trial detention punishment for misdemeanors that warrant no such penalty, a clear violation of due process and the 8th.

 

[ll74]

The fact is that the DOJ is making pre-trial detention punishment for misdemeanors that warrant no such penalty, a clear violation of due process and the 8th.

And what does that explain about what led to the Capitol breach on January the 6th?

 

[DeluxAuto]

The fact is that the DOJ is making pre-trial detention punishment for misdemeanors that warrant no such penalty, a clear violation of due process and the 8th.

None of this is happeneing, your poutrage notwithstanding. I now think Trump killed more Republitard brain cells than Obama.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

And what does that explain about what led to the Capitol breach on January the 6th?

Nothing, it just exposes the tyrannical nature of what the 1/6 protestors were decrying.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

None of this is happeneing, your poutrage notwithstanding. I now think Trump killed more Republitard brain cells than Obama.

Scores are being kept in solitary, charged with nothing or misdemeanors. It's tyrannical.

 

[ll74]

Nothing, it just exposes the tyrannical nature of what the 1/6 protestors were decrying.

Got it - thanks for admitting the deflection.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Got it - thanks for admitting the deflection.

Liberals used to care about stuff like this. The Left never did...they love the power and will use it to the hilt.

Until we say no more.

 

[ll74]

Liberals used to care about stuff like this. The Left never did...they love the power and will use it to the hilt.

Until we say no more.

Yes, I get you want to derail the topic and discuss your grievances against the left. Your incessant need to talk about whatever one holds your attention for the day is obvious in every single thread.