D-bag Resigns after Rackettering & Money-Laundering Probe

[score_keeper]

D-bag Resigns after Racketeering & Money-Laundering Probe

New Mexico House Majority Leader [Democrat] Sheryl Williams Stapleton resigned Friday amid a criminal investigation involving alleged racketeering and money laundering.

100% of the D-bag politicians crapped their pants when they heard about this.

 

[ll74]

This is a good move by the House leader.

 

[score_keeper]

This is a good move by the House leader.

What was a good move?

The money laundering or the racketeering, because it seems to being doing fuck all for her career.

 

[ll74]

What was a good move?

The money laundering or the racketeering, because it seems to being doing fuck all for her career.

Her resignation

 

[ll74]

The douchebag Trumpie in the Ohio House could learn a thing or two

 

[pecksniff]

New Mexico House Majority Leader [Democrat] Sheryl Williams Stapleton resigned Friday amid a criminal investigation involving alleged racketeering and money laundering.

100% of the D-bag politicians crapped their pants when they heard about this.

The story says every leading Dem in the state applauds her decision.

 

[score_keeper]

The story says every leading Dem in the state applauds her decision.

They should have stated how she should have never broken the law in the first place, or maybe that will come after she pleads out.

 

[pecksniff]

They should have stated how she should have never broken the law in the first place, or maybe that will come after she pleads out.

Why would anyone feel obliged to state that?

 

[score_keeper]

Why would anyone feel obliged to state that?

Because D-bags love breaking the law.

 

[ryan8558]

They should have stated how she should have never broken the law in the first place, or maybe that will come after she pleads out.

allegedly broken the law.

 

[pecksniff]

They should have stated how she should have never broken the law in the first place, or maybe that will come after she pleads out.

You're assuming her guilt, which is very doubtful.

 

[score_keeper]

You're assuming her guilt, which is very doubtful.

She's a D-bag: Her guilt is assured, and hopefully it's pursued.

 

[Rightguide]

This is a good move by the House leader.

Yeah, she was a real parasitic toad.

 

[ll74]

Yeah, she was a real parasitic toad.

The GOP Ohio House leader decided his corrupt behavior was acceptable.

 

[Rightguide]

The GOP Ohio House leader decided his corrupt behavior was acceptable.

I see the Trump supported primary candidate in Ohio won.

 

[ll74]

I see the Trump supported primary candidate in Ohio won.

Yes, the Trump supported candidate who has no chance at winning in Nov, won their primary.

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, the Trump supported candidate who has no chance at winning in Nov, won their primary.

I thought his endorsement carried no weight.

 

[ll74]

I thought his endorsement carried no weight.

Well, I was talking about the 11th dist..guess you were talking about the 15th. I haven't seen the polling data, so saying Trump was a factor would need supporting evidence to prove out

I don't know that Trump has a ton of influence in the state. It has been going red for a while

 

[Rightguide]

Well, I was talking about the 11th dist..guess you were talking about the 15th. I haven't seen the polling data, so saying Trump was a factor would need supporting evidence to prove out

I don't know that Trump has a ton of influence in the state. It has been going red for a while

I don't need any supporting evidence except the fact that Trump endorsed him, which he did.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/03/trump-backed-house-candidate-mike-carey-wins-ohio-gop-primary/

 

[ll74]

I don't need any supporting evidence except the fact that Trump endorsed him, which he did.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/03/trump-backed-house-candidate-mike-carey-wins-ohio-gop-primary/

Right, which is making an assumption with incomplete information. Shocker that is how you think

 

[Rightguide]

Right, which is making an assumption with incomplete information. Shocker that is how you think

What assumption? What incomplete information? I just provided the link.

 

[ll74]

What assumption? What incomplete information? I just provided the link.

His endorsement alone proves nothing unless you can back it up with before/after polling to show the influence.

 

[pecksniff]

She's a D-bag: Her guilt is assured, and hopefully it's pursued.

If you're looking at which party's pols, based on past behavior, should be presumed guilty by default, it ain't the Dems.

 

[pecksniff]

I thought his endorsement carried no weight.

Not as much as he appears to have expected. And if he loses that power over Pubs in primary races, what does he have left?

 

[score_keeper]

If you're looking at which party's pols, based on past behavior, should be presumed guilty by default, it ain't the Dems.

I've never met a D-bag who wasn't guilty, but lucky for D-bags, they're usually guilty in States where D-bags are in power.