Cutting/Self harm

[Bisexy]

delete

.....

 

[DarkBee]

Seek help.

 

[KoPilot]

You're using sterile sharps, and not your mom's kitchen knives, right?

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

I've been cutting for a number of years now and am desperate to take this into the bedroom...

Any takers?

PM

Self-cutting? You can't be serious. I am pretty open-minded when it comes to fetishes, but self cutting is not a fetish. It is a subconscious response to intense emotional pain and frustration. If you are serious about this, for your own mental health, you need to talk to someone who can help you. You won't find what you need here.

 

[lovecraft68]

Yeah really honey get yourself some help. There is nothing sadder than seeing a person whose arms and legs are covered in those scars.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Yes, you can take this into the bedroom. It falls under the BDSM category and lots of people love, and practice, cutting and bloodplay. Ritualising a self harm is a step on the way to controlling it.

Plus, there are some other variation that you might not know of-- needles, inserted under the skin, for instance;

Join fetlife.com and do a search for your area and also a search for groups that discuss your interests.

My best wishes to you.

Folks once more, this IS the fetish forum. Please watch those jerking knees. This woman already knows all about the help that's available, you can tell by the way she worded her post. You aren't doing her any good by shaking your collective fingers at her.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

Folks once more, this IS the fetish forum. Please watch those jerking knees. This woman already knows all about the help that's available, you can tell by the way she worded her post. You aren't doing her any good by shaking your collective fingers at her.

There is a difference between fetish and mental illness. Anything that causes permanent physical or mental damage should not be encouraged.

 

[twister947]

I agree with Stella. While bloodplay may not be common, it's far from rare.

 

[understated]

Folks once more, this IS the fetish forum. Please watch those jerking knees. This woman already knows all about the help that's available, you can tell by the way she worded her post. You aren't doing her any good by shaking your collective fingers at her.

hallelujah.
thanks for saying this
and for posting a yummy pic.

to the OP
trust is absolutely essential when you're playing with sharp things.
as is safety, sterility, etc.
with proper precautions taken, though, it can be brilliant.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

I agree with Stella. While bloodplay may not be common, it's far from rare.

Rape is common, so why not legitimize that also? Where do you draw the line?

 

[understated]

Rape is common, so why not legitimize that also? Where do you draw the line?

Where do I draw the line?
At informed consent.
Most rape is about penetration, the most vanilla sex there is. The reason it is offensive isn't because of the type of sex involved, it's because the sex is involuntary.
If someone has a fetish for cutting, or for anything else, on the other hand, it is not just voluntary or consensual, it is most likely enthusiastic.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

Most rape is about penetration, the most vanilla sex there is.

There's a new one on me. I have never seen rape equated to vanilla sex in any context.

 

[lovecraft68]

hallelujah.
thanks for saying this
and for posting a yummy pic.

to the OP
trust is absolutely essential when you're playing with sharp things.
as is safety, sterility, etc.
with proper precautions taken, though, it can be brilliant.

Trust who herself? The girl is a self cutter. There is no one cutting her for sexual pleasure. This isn't about a kink or a fetish.

 

[lovecraft68]

Where do I draw the line?
At informed consent.
Most rape is about penetration, the most vanilla sex there is. The reason it is offensive isn't because of the type of sex involved, it's because the sex is involuntary.
If someone has a fetish for cutting, or for anything else, on the other hand, it is not just voluntary or consensual, it is most likely enthusiastic.

But at what point does a fetish which can be harmful become dangerous? I know this sounds crazy but I once read an article about a fetish for amputation. Not to have sex with amputees mind you but to have a limb lopped off for sexual release.

The article came out because some sick individual managed to somehow convince his lover to cut his arm off from below the elbow. It was consensual. Should he be allowed to lose the rest of his limbs or should someone help him?

Just because it can be done does not necessarily mean one should always do it. Some people are equipped for this some are not. A lot of cutting is a cry for help. In which case someone like yourself is causing more harm than good with your if it feels good do it mantra.

And to agree with the other poster Rape is not vanilla. Your an idiot for making that remark. My wife works in the field and has seen the results. So stop being stupid.

 

[twister947]

Rape is common, so why not legitimize that also? Where do you draw the line?

Where? Between involuntary and consensual.

The OP didn't ask for all of this finger shaking and tongue clucking.

 

[KoPilot]

Trust who herself? The girl is a self cutter. There is no one cutting her for sexual pleasure. This isn't about a kink or a fetish.

So what-- trust you instead? You're hilarious.

How about you understand that this is your opinion, and that you don't actually know what's going on in her head? Sounds good to me. Pretty arrogant of you to be able to say what is and what isn't a kink or fetish for others. I'm into giants; you gonna tell me I should seek help for having daddy issues? Get over yourself.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

Where? Between involuntary and consensual.

The OP didn't ask for all of this finger shaking and tongue clucking.

The OP doesn't have to ask, the forum rules permits unsolicited finger shaking and tongue clucking.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

you gonna tell me I should seek help for having daddy issues?.

If you have daddy issues, you should seek help. I'm your daddy, can I help you?

 

[KoPilot]

If you have daddy issues, you should seek help. I'm your daddy, can I help you?

Only if you're a sugar daddy. ;B

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

Where do I draw the line?
At informed consent.

There have been cases of consensual cannibalism, where one person consents to be killed and eaten by another. Should we permit that too?

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

Only if you're a sugar daddy. ;B

I can sweeten your little honey pot.

 

[twister947]

There have been cases of consensual cannibalism, where one person consents to be killed and eaten by another. Should we permit that too?

Permit? Who are we to allow or disallow activities between consenting adults? It's none of our business.

 

[Nasty_Deeds]

There have been cases of consensual cannibalism, where one person consents to be killed and eaten by another. Should we permit that too?

Permit? Who are we to allow or disallow activities between consenting adults? It's none of our business.

Ok, since you are quick to allow consensual cannibalism in our society, how far are you willing to go? There more than a few cases of consensual pedophilia, where the child consents to have sex with an adult. Are you personally willing to support pedophilia in our society just because the child consents?

 

[twister947]

Ok, since you are quick to allow consensual cannibalism in our society, how far are you willing to go? There more than a few cases of consensual pedophilia, where the child consents to have sex with an adult. Are you personally willing to support pedophilia in our society just because the child consents?

You'll notice, I've limited my part of this discussion to consenting adults. Moreover, you've gone quite far afield from the question posited by the op, who, btw, seems to have left the building.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

There have been cases of consensual cannibalism, where one person consents to be killed and eaten by another. Should we permit that too?

The Jeffery Dahmer defense