cut or uncut?

Ligeia

Virgin
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Posts
4
I've only been with one man, my boyfriend of almost six years. He's wonderful, but I can't help but wonder what an uncut one feels like. Since there seems to be a plethora of experience on this board, I was hoping some might share their thoughts.

Is the sensation terribly different? I do know my boy is not opposed to three-somes, if it comes to that... :D
 
Uncut is the norm in the UK, which is a shame as I find cut vastly preferable. It just looks nicer, and is easier to keep clean. But apart from aesthetics, there are no real differences between the two for us laydeez.
 
Miss Ladybird said:
Uncut is the norm in the UK, which is a shame as I find cut vastly preferable.

I know exactly how you feel. I really prefer women who have had their bacon-flaps sliced off, but they so hard to find in this day and age. I really wish this would become the social norm!
 
A short time ago, I started this thread in regards to uncut men. For the first time in my life (and I'm 43) I have a partner who is uncut and I absolutely LOVE IT! It does look different, yes, but I actually think it is quite appealing. I especially like to watch as he becomes more and more excited and the head first starts to "peek" out, then it begins to show more and more until it is finally fully exposed. For some reason that just really turns me on! (And makes my partner laugh like silly!)

I've not noticed anything different feeling, however, I have noticed an increase in my own lubrication. As my thread indicates, I'm approaching that age where natural lubrication can sometimes be less than normal, unfortunately. Yet, I've not had that problem at all with my current patner. Even if he enters me when I'm not fully aroused, I am able to produce enough lubrication to make it very enjoyable within seconds. (And yeah, he is a great sex partner, but I really think it's the uncut penis that has more to do with this.)

The other fun thing about an uncut penis is doing oral. Love sliding my tongue along the inside of foreskin and tugging at it (gently!) with my lips. I also like the moans and groans I hear from my partner as I push the foreskin back with my lips and pay attention to the head.

I have become a total fan of the uncut penis, and I doubt I'll ever go back! I know that guys who are cut normally did not have a say in it (done when they were babies), but I have found I much more prefer my man "natural" - the way nature intended!
 
SexyChele said:
A short time ago, I started this thread in regards to uncut men. For the first time in my life (and I'm 43) I have a partner who is uncut and I absolutely LOVE IT!

Apparently there are some cut men who stretch the remaining skin back into a semblance of a foreskin. Let's see... there are some pics here:

http://indra.com/~shredder/restore/pix.html

What are people's opinions of this: (1) Hey, it's a foreskin! or (2) Gross..nothing like the real thing.
 
Last edited:
I'd heard of this - there are quite a few men in the US who I've heard talk about this. But I'd never seen what the end results would look like. It looks the same to me as a man who is natural, and unless the gentleman in question told me what he had done I would assume it was natural. I wonder, would a man have the sensitivity/would the penis react the same way? (Seems stupid, I know!)

Also, I wonder if taping the skin is as painful as it sounds?
 
I used to have an English girl friend, and everyone she knew prefered circumcised men because it was easier to keep clean. What she meant was, she and her girlfriends kept getting guys who found it too difficult (too much of a hassle?) to keep it clean, so they'd wind up with a mouth full of smegma when they went down on their boys. Needless to say, she was not a fan of uncircumcised penises!

All the same, if it hadn't been so important to my wife to circumcise our son, like me, I would have preferred to allow the foreskin to stay.

I've heard that about 1/2 of all American boys, these days, are uncut. That's quite a swing from just a few years ago, eh?
 
Chuckwrox said:
I used to have an English girl friend, and everyone she knew prefered circumcised men because it was easier to keep clean. What she meant was, she and her girlfriends kept getting guys who found it too difficult (too much of a hassle?) to keep it clean, so they'd wind up with a mouth full of smegma when they went down on their boys. Needless to say, she was not a fan of uncircumcised penises!

All the same, if it hadn't been so important to my wife to circumcise our son, like me, I would have preferred to allow the foreskin to stay.

I've heard that about 1/2 of all American boys, these days, are uncut. That's quite a swing from just a few years ago, eh?


I can't imagine a man not wanting to keep the underside of the foreskin clean! After all, that is the best place and chance for an infection to set in!

Although I do have to admit that the first time I went down on my partner the thought crossed my mind: "Just what am I going to find under that foreskin??" Luckily, he is a man who makes certain he is clean.

And yeah, I think you are correct. The swing in American culture is to leave boys uncut. I've know quite a few people who have had baby boys in the past 2 years, and all have decided against circumcision. From the parents I've talked to, they've pointed out that if their sons want to be circumsized they can do so when they are older and make the decision for themselves. Me? I think it's a good thing - but I'm a bit biased!
 
My lover of 20+ years is uncut , and I love it! I find it erotic and natural thing. I think if a cock is uncut it has plenty of room to expand :) I love to stroke his cock using his foreskin allow my hand to make nice and long strokes.
On the other hand it must be kept clean, whereas a cut one gets clean with the rest. Also, I believe and uncut cock is more sensitive..:kiss: T
 
SexyChele said:
I'd heard of this - there are quite a few men in the US who I've heard talk about this. But I'd never seen what the end results would look like. It looks the same to me as a man who is natural, and unless the gentleman in question told me what he had done I would assume it was natural. I wonder, would a man have the sensitivity/would the penis react the same way? (Seems stupid, I know!)

Also, I wonder if taping the skin is as painful as it sounds?

I am one of those men. I'm not sure if its because I did it young (between ages 18-21 or so), but my foreskin has the same glove like fit that a natural one does.

Does taping hurt? Not really. I used the "T-tape" method for awhile. If you put too much tension on, you'll get tiny lil micro tears in the skin that you can barely see, but hurt like a mother.

I switched to a tapeless device called the Tugahoy (http://www.tugahoy.com) which worked wonderfully for the rest of my project.

I'm happy, my fiance is happy... she loves the "gliding" motion of the foreskin.

It has been debated to death in these forums (leaving your child intact vs. circumcising him) so I won't run long winded here.

The bottom line in that men are born with foreskins for a reason. We do not cut pieces off little girls. There is no reason for the mass circumcision of american boys, other than superstition. To argue otherwise, is to stand beside the pile of shit the white elephant has left in the living room and claim there is no stench.
 
TheCurious said:
I am one of those men. I'm not sure if its because I did it young (between ages 18-21 or so), but my foreskin has the same glove like fit that a natural one does.


That's interesting. More glove-like than the one in the pictures in the link above? I asked my original question because I thought that the one on the web one looked really, erm, floppy, but I guess others thought it looked normal.

edit: OK, I looked at that tugahoy link you posted, and from the pictures I see what you mean - I find it amazing that they can manage to do that.
 
Last edited:
EarnestImp said:
That's interesting. More glove-like than the one in the pictures in the link above?

Yeah... much better than that. Really its just appearance... I've seen some labia in my time that look like a dog chewed on them... but that didn't change the pleasure they gave the woman, so what does it matter?

As far as mine "fitting like a glove" I've got a handful of theories on the subject. First I did it very slowly... some guys tug 24/7 with high tension. I think that over stresses the skin. Think about some guy you know that lifts weights for like 4 hours a day. He's always getting injuries and talking about how sore he is, etc. I used a more relaxed schedule, and I wasn't worried if I missed a few days (or even weeks)

Another aspect is when the photo is taken. Tugging makes the skin swell, its called edema. Its nothing more than water increase in the tissue after being stressed by the tugging. After you stop tugging the edema goes away in a few days to a week. Most guys are so excited when they are "done" that they take a picture right away. Thus you have tons of pictures on the net of guys with those really baggy puffy looking foreskins. After I was finished with my project... I was puffy for a few days to a week or so... and then over the course of a few months... the skin and underlying muscle tissue "settled into place" and everything snugged right up.
 
TheCurious said:
After I was finished with my project... I was puffy for a few days to a week or so... and then over the course of a few months... the skin and underlying muscle tissue "settled into place" and everything snugged right up.


Hmmm...so does this mean us ladies will be graced a picture of the finished product sometimes soon? :)


Hope you realize I'm only kidding! Sounds as though you've had some great results and I'm happy for you!
 
TheCurious said:
The bottom line in that men are born with foreskins for a reason.

We're also born with tonsils and an appendix, but when a doctor goes to work on them with a scalpel, you don't see people trying to make new ones with the surrounding tissue...

:rolleyes:
 
fiery_jack said:
We're also born with tonsils and an appendix, but when a doctor goes to work on them with a scalpel, you don't see people trying to make new ones with the surrounding tissue...

So you are militantly opposed to breast reconstruction after a mastectomy, and would never contemplate a prosthetic limb were to you to lose one of your own? One can use silly analogies to prove anything....:p
 
Chuckwrox said:
I used to have an English girl friend, and everyone she knew prefered circumcised men because it was easier to keep clean. What she meant was, she and her girlfriends kept getting guys who found it too difficult (too much of a hassle?) to keep it clean, so they'd wind up with a mouth full of smegma when they went down on their boys. Needless to say, she was not a fan of uncircumcised penises!

I'm sorry to say this, but come on guys!

Is keeping the mini-me clean a reason for this mutilation? Historically it might have been, but these days, we have things like Running Water and Soap to take care of that problem.

I'm 26, uncut, and hygiene has never been a problem. Take a daily shower and dedicate a minute to clean the fella. How lazy are pepole, really?

Btw, my lady has an adoring tendency to want to nibble it, so there is no way I'm going for the knife here...
 
I've had both, and it doesn't really make a difference while having sex. I do notice that giving an un-cut guy a hand job is easier, but I also like the cleanliness factor of the cut guy's. Yes, I know you can keep it clean, but the guy I was with was lazy. YUCK
 
I been with my boyfriend for 4 years and he is the first uncut male I had and I love it. He is so sensitive that whatever I do to him he wiggles and squirms and it turns me on even more :) Our love making is unbelievable, He can make me orgasim fast! :D
 
i don't have a preference - they're only as good as the man they're attatched to!

visually, there's almost no diff when erect, and lets face it - that's when it matters, right?!

hygeine-wise, if a guy washes properly, then he's clean: if he doesn't, then it's not gonna matter if he's cut or uncut, he's still gonna stink.

and some of the most sensitive guys i've ever been with were cut, so i guess that rules out the 'loss of feeling' arguement as well.
 
Back
Top