someoneyouknow
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Posts
- 28,274
The latest denial about saying what he did involves the con artist claiming he did not say he had a great/good relationship with Kim Jong-un, the dictator of North Korea.
His usual method of denial, tweets, claiming the Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupter Murdoch, a very close and intimate friend, and someone who also happens to own the Fox tabloid which acts as a second mouthpiece for the con artist, has "lied" and/or "misquoted" what he said during an interview.
However, two can play that game, and the Wall Street journal released the audio of the con artist saying he had a great/good relationship with the dictator, words clearly heard. Even a third-party transcription service quoted the con artist saying the same thing. Listen for yourself:
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/952404617261961216
It is quite clear from the audio the con artist deliberately mentioned having a good relationship with the dictator. There was no misspoken word, no gurgling, no indecisiveness.
For his part, the con artist said he used the word "I'd" at the beginning of the sentence, “I probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong-un," which would make the sentence, "I'd probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong-un." Which makes little sense when he's talking about having, present tense, good relationships with those mentioned foreign leaders.
The entire transcript:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-of-donald-trump-interview-with-the-wall-street-journal-1515715481?mod=e2tw
His usual method of denial, tweets, claiming the Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupter Murdoch, a very close and intimate friend, and someone who also happens to own the Fox tabloid which acts as a second mouthpiece for the con artist, has "lied" and/or "misquoted" what he said during an interview.
However, two can play that game, and the Wall Street journal released the audio of the con artist saying he had a great/good relationship with the dictator, words clearly heard. Even a third-party transcription service quoted the con artist saying the same thing. Listen for yourself:
https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/952404617261961216
It is quite clear from the audio the con artist deliberately mentioned having a good relationship with the dictator. There was no misspoken word, no gurgling, no indecisiveness.
For his part, the con artist said he used the word "I'd" at the beginning of the sentence, “I probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong-un," which would make the sentence, "I'd probably have a very good relationship with Kim Jong-un." Which makes little sense when he's talking about having, present tense, good relationships with those mentioned foreign leaders.
The entire transcript:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-of-donald-trump-interview-with-the-wall-street-journal-1515715481?mod=e2tw
