Communal Marriage?

SEVERUSMAX

Benevolent Master
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Posts
28,995
What about a scenario where every man and woman is deemed to be married to each other upon reaching 18? That eliminates marital status and fidelity issues, not mention making monogamy moot. It would also abolish divorce.
 
How is that functionally different from just abolishing marriage?
 
How is that functionally different from just abolishing marriage?

It creates a sense of family and a union between the sexes. It also eliminates the idea of delaying sex for years until the wedding. Anyway, just a thought. It's meant to encourage free love, as it were.
 
Free love sounds great. :) Not sure about "everyone" all marrying everyone else once they turn 18, but i can see this in a compound. :D
 
I'd like to read it

What about a scenario where every man and woman is deemed to be married to each other upon reaching 18? That eliminates marital status and fidelity issues, not mention making monogamy moot. It would also abolish divorce.

John Humphrey Noyes and his Oneida Perfectionists :D did that until it was made illegal. Charles Manson :devil: led the "Manson Family," had a sex-filled quasi-commune in the 1960s that almost did that and David Koresh :devil: and his Branch Davidian religious sect, did something close to that.

I'm not saying make it a creepy cult :( but maybe it would be more realistic to have one main guy that is a fast talker convince some people that he knows from somewhere to try it (where all adults are married together). :) I know, in the right way and in the right mood I might even give it a try. ;) I know I'm weird but I always liked polygamy only this way is even better. I can see how women that think like me might go along with it just to stay connected or to feel what it is all like. :eek:

I'm out of breath:cattail:
 
Yeah I'm going along with the small group tries it thought. Though if say it was me, there so would not be a couple guys and alot of women, other way around. ;)

Now personally, I could handle up to three husbands, though they'd rather have to be average in size or fastish. Other way around, I'd so dump him, I am not gonna split time with one guy with three or more wives, lose alot of the sex that way and well screw that. :mad:
 
Free love sounds great. :) Not sure about "everyone" all marrying everyone else once they turn 18, but i can see this in a compound. :D

Probably would work better in a very small society. I think a community, as you said, or as I was thinking, a group of survivors of an apocalyptic plague.

Oh, and how much sex a plural wife would get from each plural husband in such a scenario depends on how high his libido. Mine, for instance, not to boast, is probably a bit on the high end for a man in his 30s.
 
Me??? Heck no I am with an incredibly hunky loving guy who is almost hung like a horse. He's not as long but quite long enough thank you incredibly much. ;)

Besides, he has a pretty good sized sex drive and can last for hours. Just out of personal safety I flirt madly with him so I almost always get a before sleep screwing. :cathappy:
 
Me??? Heck no I am with an incredibly hunky loving guy who is almost hung like a horse. He's not as long but quite long enough thank you incredibly much. ;)

Besides, he has a pretty good sized sex drive and can last for hours. Just out of personal safety I flirt madly with him so I almost always get a before sleep screwing. :cathappy:

That's okay. I was making an academic point, not a sexual advance. ;) Though I do flirt outrageously with all of the ladies at Lit (some more than others, of course).
 
Liar liar pants on fire. :p

Besides I was answering a question put forth by vaathsyaayana. ;)

Biggest problem with poly relationships though is only one side of it can have a high sex charge, if all or some of both sides have high sex drives, it's gonna fall apart, biggest reason I couldn't stand to be one of the wives.

Course if everybody has a low sex drive it will lead to problems as well. Mainly cause he's supposed to rotate between wives and give them their weekly sex, if he can't handle 3-4+ times a week he's gonna have some pissed off wives. :rolleyes:

Multiple hubbies can be bad to, suppose she isn't in the mood for one or more, horny guys tend to be a bit cranky. :rolleyes:

I'm gonna have to think on this, well have some mind blowing sex and sleep then think but thinking will be in there somewhere I swear. ;)
 
Sex can free the mind to think, once the distraction of horniness is gone. ;)

Ah, that question....

I think that the post-apoc scenario is best. Radical solutions would be considered more quickly in such a case. What you said about sex drives is another factor...but with more than one of each sex...hopefully, everyone could find a partner when required. Wife 2 wants round 2, but hubby 1 is now with wife 1, so she finds hubby 2. :devil: Just an example.

I envision there being a slightly larger number of men than women, but a few of those men are gay. Which is another choice if all of the wives are occupied. ;)
 
Probably would work better in a very small society. I think a community, as you said, or as I was thinking, a group of survivors of an apocalyptic plague.

Oh, and how much sex a plural wife would get from each plural husband in such a scenario depends on how high his libido. Mine, for instance, not to boast, is probably a bit on the high end for a man in his 30s.

Would Your wife get mad if i asked You to marry me? ;)
 
I think that the post-apoc scenario is best. Radical solutions would be considered more quickly in such a case. What you said about sex drives is another factor...but with more than one of each sex...hopefully, everyone could find a partner when required. Wife 2 wants round 2, but hubby 1 is now with wife 1, so she finds hubby 2. :devil: Just an example.
Are we talking a "right-after" story, when they're setting the system up, or a "years-later" story, when it's been in existentce long enough for it to have become the accepted norm?

I envision there being a slightly larger number of men than women, but a few of those men are gay. Which is another choice if all of the wives are occupied. ;)
Wouldn't there also be a couple of lesbians, though?
 
Well of course there would, which actually can be an interesting story in and of itself. Supposing that the world had just ended leaving a smallish number of survivors, one of the women is lesbian, but because there are so few survivors she has to have plenty of sex with men, which holds no interest for her at all. ;)
 
Are we talking a "right-after" story, when they're setting the system up, or a "years-later" story, when it's been in existentce long enough for it to have become the accepted norm?


Wouldn't there also be a couple of lesbians, though?

A right-after one. And there's one lesbian, but she doesn't have much choice, since there are no others. ;)
 
Yeah I'm going along with the small group tries it thought. Though if say it was me, there so would not be a couple guys and alot of women, other way around.

Now personally, I could handle up to three husbands, though they'd rather have to be average in size or fastish. Other way around, I'd so dump him, I am not gonna split time with one guy with three or more wives, lose alot of the sex that way and well screw that.
A balanced group would avoid all this. The same number of women as men, and a "who sleeps with whom" rota so monogamous pairs don't build up accidentally. This would be essential in a "just started" situation.

Roamme said:
... maybe it would be more realistic to have one main guy that is a fast talker convince some people that he knows from somewhere to try it ...
Fast talkers who are convincing usually end up with the lion's share of the women. It is a natural result of an Alpha Male in a group of animals/humans.
 
A balanced group would avoid all this. The same number of women as men, and a "who sleeps with whom" rota so monogamous pairs don't build up accidentally. This would be essential in a "just started" situation.

Fast talkers who are convincing usually end up with the lion's share of the women. It is a natural result of an Alpha Male in a group of animals/humans.

Naturally. Monogamy is a social experiment with no foundation in human nature. It is no accident that as monogamy has been more expected of people, marriage as an institution has weakened.
 
You know this wouldn't be a bad concept for a comedy, a person accidentlly gets married in a communal marriage and has to go about finding all the people to get a divorce before they can get remarried.
 
You know this wouldn't be a bad concept for a comedy, a person accidentlly gets married in a communal marriage and has to go about finding all the people to get a divorce before they can get remarried.

Of course, if the whole population wed to each other, it would be pointless to divorce any of them.
 
Back
Top