someoneyouknow
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2006
- Posts
- 28,274
After admitting during the 2016 presidential campaign the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton's emails, then later saying there was no reason to prosecute, only to once again say an investigation was underway just days before the election, FBI director James Comey has admitted, under oath, the FBI has been investigating collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia since July of 2016.
Comey also said that Russia "hates" Clinton and wanted her to lose the election; he added that officials believe both political parties were hacked in 2016, but only Democratic emails were released.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/fbi-director-blasted-democrats-probe-revelation-46270462
On a related, but truly surprising development, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters "the hearing participants are confused about the situation," adding: "They are trying to find confirmation of their own conclusions but can't find either proof or confirmation and are going round in circles."
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/kremlin-us-intelligence-committee-confused-46271510
Who would have thought a country who colluded with one person to help them win an election would say they had nothing to do with anything and no amount of evidence would say otherwise? It would be like that same country repeatedly saying they had not sent their troops to seize someone else's land, right up to the moment they admitted doing so.
Comey also said that Russia "hates" Clinton and wanted her to lose the election; he added that officials believe both political parties were hacked in 2016, but only Democratic emails were released.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/fbi-director-blasted-democrats-probe-revelation-46270462
On a related, but truly surprising development, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters "the hearing participants are confused about the situation," adding: "They are trying to find confirmation of their own conclusions but can't find either proof or confirmation and are going round in circles."
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/kremlin-us-intelligence-committee-confused-46271510
Who would have thought a country who colluded with one person to help them win an election would say they had nothing to do with anything and no amount of evidence would say otherwise? It would be like that same country repeatedly saying they had not sent their troops to seize someone else's land, right up to the moment they admitted doing so.
