Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded,

Knot Again

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Posts
1,024
During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI’s interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.

Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.

He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.”

When asked if there was a transcript of the interview, Comey stated that there wasn’t one because the interview wasn’t recorded, but there was an analysis of Clinton’s interview.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ecorded-but-it-would-still-be-a-crime-to-lie/


A PUSSY PASS
 

Okay, let me see. "It's still a crime to lie to us" but we didn't record the interview that would have established irrefutable evidence that she might have been lying to us and allowed us to prosecute her for THAT crime.

Fuck, that's pretty bad, Jimbo.

I wonder if FBI agents will now leave their weapons in the car upon arriving at the scene of an active shooting?
 
Okay, let me see. "It's still a crime to lie to us" but we didn't record the interview that would have established irrefutable evidence that she might have been lying to us and allowed us to prosecute her for THAT crime.

Fuck, that's pretty bad, Jimbo.

I wonder if FBI agents will now leave their weapons in the car upon arriving at the scene of an active shooting?

almost as bad as this:

In interest of time, because I have a plane to catch tomorrow afternoon, I'm not going to go through anymore of the false statements but I am going to ask you put on your old hat. False exculpatory statements, they are used for what?" Gowdy inquired.

Comey responded, "Either for the substantive prosecution or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution."

"Exactly. Intent and consciousness of guilt, right? Is that right?" Gowdy asked. "Consciousness of guilt and intent. In your old job you would prove intent as you just referenced by showing the jury evidence of a complex scheme that was designed for the very purpose of concealing the public record, and you would be arguing in addition to concealment the destruction that you and I just talked about, or certainly the failure to preserve. Would you argue all that under heading of content--intent. You would also be arguing the pervasiveness of the scheme, when it started, when it ended and number of emails, whether they were originally classified or up-classified, you would argue all of that under the heading of intent. You would also probably under common scheme or plan argue the burn bags of daily calendar entries or the missing daily calendar entries as a common scheme or plan to conceal. Two days ago, director, you said a reasonable person in her should have known a private email is no place to send and receive classified information.

or the fact that there is no difference between gross negligence and extremely careless....
 
almost as bad as this:

In interest of time, because I have a plane to catch tomorrow afternoon, I'm not going to go through anymore of the false statements but I am going to ask you put on your old hat. False exculpatory statements, they are used for what?" Gowdy inquired.

Comey responded, "Either for the substantive prosecution or for evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution."

"Exactly. Intent and consciousness of guilt, right? Is that right?" Gowdy asked. "Consciousness of guilt and intent. In your old job you would prove intent as you just referenced by showing the jury evidence of a complex scheme that was designed for the very purpose of concealing the public record, and you would be arguing in addition to concealment the destruction that you and I just talked about, or certainly the failure to preserve. Would you argue all that under heading of content--intent. You would also be arguing the pervasiveness of the scheme, when it started, when it ended and number of emails, whether they were originally classified or up-classified, you would argue all of that under the heading of intent. You would also probably under common scheme or plan argue the burn bags of daily calendar entries or the missing daily calendar entries as a common scheme or plan to conceal. Two days ago, director, you said a reasonable person in her should have known a private email is no place to send and receive classified information.

or the fact that there is no difference between gross negligence and extremely careless....

I almost responded to this in the other thread. Yeah....that's a pretty damn good argument.
 
Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.


dont ask

dont tell


its as if he DIDNT WANT TO KNOW
 
I wonder if anyone asked him if that was typical to not swear in an individual and not record an interview.
 
When my vee-hick-kill is pulled over by the local police in a tiny town I expect to be, and am actually recorded in my interaction with the local police over a minor traffic infraction.

They are pretty proud of their technology which by the way came courtesy of a US Federal grant.

They sent me a DVD in the mail of a recording of the incident. Where I was alleged to have engaged in exhibition of speed.

Unfortunately they didn't capture the actual alleged offence merely their interview with me regarding the alleged events. Interesting that they record interviews and the FBI doesn't. Maybe the FBI can get a Federal grant for recording equipment.
 
Now they're gong to refer her perjury offense to the FBI...wha, wha, wha.

Will she be the first perjurer elected president?

The Clintons are America's Crime Family.
 
What's truly hilarious is that you bozos still trust any branch of the totally corrupted USSA federal government in any way whatsoever.

No oath? No transcript, not even any notes? What's next? No informing the prime suspect in what the FBI itself termed "a criminal investigation" that she had the right to not answer them, to remain silent, but that if she did choose to answer them that info could be used against her in court?

RIIIIIIIGHT.

THEY ALL OUTRIGHT LIE TO COVER THEIR ASSES POLITICALLY, and you lemmings keep paying them to do it TO YOU.

SUCKERS!

DON'T
2016
VOTE



CLINTON/TRUMP
2016
JUST SAY NO
 
The Peter Principle applies here. HRC wants a job higher than her level of competence. She's the Corky Thatcher of IT.
 
lets face it

SHE GOT AWAY WITH A CRIME AND THE FBI ASSISTED IN IT

He had no choice.

Lynch and Obama made it quite clear...

:(

She was to get off, they were not going to follow any recommendation, and in that political theater the only thing he could do was ruin the careers of a of of FBI people, so he took the sword, ruined his reputation and let everyone else under him live to fight another day. In the last two days, he told us how corrupt she was in order to let us draw our own conclusions even as the press and Democrats were high-fiving each other.

As I have been saying for months, her trial and sentence will be pronounced by a jury of ~not~ her peers in November...

If she loses, then the FBI sill has the Foundation.
 
TOO BIG TO JAIL:

Shot: FBI and other federal agents must now tape interviews with suspects. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. said: “Creating an electronic record will ensure that we have an objective account of key investigations and interactions with people who are held in federal custody.”

—The L.A. Times, May 22, 2014.

Chaser: Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie.

—Breitbart.com, today.

As Sean Davis of the Federalist asks, “I would very much like to know which political appointee in the FBI ordered agents to not record or transcribe their Hillary interview.”
 
Disgraceful Treatment Of Marine Losing His Career For Sending Just 1 Classified Email To Save Lives

Screen Shot 2016-07-07 at 3.11.05 PM

He's just a hero, not a Clinton.

Via IJR:

Maj. Jason Brezler has dedicated his life to protecting his fellow Americans — first as a Marine fighting in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and now as a Marine reservist and member of the Fire Department of New York.

But despite his service, Brezler was forced out of the Marine Corps in 2015 for sharing one classified email during his 15 years of service.

The Washington Post reports that Brezler was stateside when he sent an email in 2012 warning his deployed colleagues about an Afghan police chief, Sarwar Jan, who worked at their post and was “crooked” and “sexually abused” boys, attaching a classified document including allegations that he was part of the Taliban.

His warning fell on deaf ears. More than two weeks later, one of the older boys – who was a victim of Jan’s abuse – shot and killed three Marines, wounding a fourth.
 
Even if everything was on the up and up, this all looks like a monkey fucking a football.

Fucking Tom Brady had it worse than she did.
 
Disgraceful Treatment Of Marine Losing His Career For Sending Just 1 Classified Email To Save Lives

Screen Shot 2016-07-07 at 3.11.05 PM

He's just a hero, not a Clinton.

Via IJR:

Maj. Jason Brezler has dedicated his life to protecting his fellow Americans — first as a Marine fighting in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and now as a Marine reservist and member of the Fire Department of New York.

But despite his service, Brezler was forced out of the Marine Corps in 2015 for sharing one classified email during his 15 years of service.

The Washington Post reports that Brezler was stateside when he sent an email in 2012 warning his deployed colleagues about an Afghan police chief, Sarwar Jan, who worked at their post and was “crooked” and “sexually abused” boys, attaching a classified document including allegations that he was part of the Taliban.

His warning fell on deaf ears. More than two weeks later, one of the older boys – who was a victim of Jan’s abuse – shot and killed three Marines, wounding a fourth.

His Lawyer should contact the pentagon demand the Hillary Deal or threaten to sue.

Even if everything was on the up and up, this all looks like a monkey fucking a football.

Fucking Tom Brady had it worse than she did.

So should Brady, there was no intent :rolleyes:
 
He had no choice.

Lynch and Obama made it quite clear...

:(

She was to get off, they were not going to follow any recommendation, and in that political theater the only thing he could do was ruin the careers of a of of FBI people, so he took the sword, ruined his reputation and let everyone else under him live to fight another day. In the last two days, he told us how corrupt she was in order to let us draw our own conclusions even as the press and Democrats were high-fiving each other.

As I have been saying for months, her trial and sentence will be pronounced by a jury of ~not~ her peers in November...

If she loses, then the FBI sill has the Foundation.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/89/6b/c2/896bc2efeb75c3725fc2fb0c8658ba80.jpg
 
Back
Top