Clones

[John745577]

1

12345

 

[snoopercharmbrights]

... Hope I didn't post this in the wrong forum... I hate it when I do that...

No - that's fine.

I don't know if it's just me or not, but I like the idea of a clone gangbang or reverse gangbang.
I figure, there are soo many fetishes, someone else is bound to have it, right? ...

Er ... I thought the point of clones was that they are all identical and will, therefore, have the same predilections?

... Or could point me in the direction where I might find something like this? ...

382 clone stories on here, according to story search.

 

[John745577]

12345

 

[Lost_Yonder]

a female having sex with her cloned self - that would be most intriguing....

 

[captainscarlett]

The basic argument here is whether you think that the clones all have the same life experiences as well as the same bodies.

 

[snoopercharmbrights]

The basic argument here is whether you think that the clones all have the same life experiences as well as the same bodies.

If you believe that sexuality is a genetic disposition, which is the current politically correct view, then all members of a clone group will be identical sexuality according to genetic make-up.

If you believe that sexuality is an acquired trait conditioned by life experiences then, of course, the clone group may contain a mix of inclinations. However, if you do believe this then don't tell anyone, because you may get lynched for suggesting that homosexuality can be "cured", since acquired traits can be reversed.

 

[CopperSkink]

Sorry for butting into what's supposed to be something about similarly-faced individuals engaging in sexual activities with one-another or others, but is that to say that homosexuality is a genetic trait? Wouldn't that mean it would simply get weeded out due to the lack of procreation precipitated by the very concept of homosexuality?

And would clone/clone clone/original be labled under incest, or masturbation?

 

[banes27]

If you believe that sexuality is a genetic disposition, which is the current politically correct view, then all members of a clone group will be identical sexuality according to genetic make-up.

If you believe that sexuality is an acquired trait conditioned by life experiences then, of course, the clone group may contain a mix of inclinations. However, if you do believe this then don't tell anyone, because you may get lynched for suggesting that homosexuality can be "cured", since acquired traits can be reversed.

Although there's also a third hypothesis relying on peri-genetics (I think that was the name). That is, you have an inherent predisposition for a certain sexuality but whether or not you outwardly express that sexuality past the genetic level is down to the experiences of life. Some early development might, in essence, "switch off" the set of genes which would make a person gay, straight, bi, etc. and lead them to be something else. In other words, predisposition to a certain sexual orientation is a genetic trait but whether the information contained within those genes is then translated into the real-world is down to experiences in life, i.e. sexual orientation is intially nature and then a combination of nature and nurture.

 

[banes27]

Sorry for butting into what's supposed to be something about similarly-faced individuals engaging in sexual activities with one-another or others, but is that to say that homosexuality is a genetic trait? Wouldn't that mean it would simply get weeded out due to the lack of procreation precipitated by the very concept of homosexuality?

And would clone/clone clone/original be labled under incest, or masturbation?

That assumes, of course, that homosexuals do not go on to reproduce at all and that homosexuality is caused by a single gene. If homosexuality were purely genetic then it's entirely possible that it might be a recessive trait and require it's presence in the genes of both the mother and father meaning that both parents could be straight but carry the "gay gene". The same happens with certain eye and hair colours. For example, IIRC, ginger hair only turns up when it appears in chromosomes from the mother and the father but wouldn't turn up if the gene appeared in chromosomes only from the father or the mother. This means that the gene could essentially be carried for generations before being physically represented by the individual.

 

[RicoLouis]

And would clone/clone clone/original be labled under incest, or masturbation?

Guess it depends on the method of cloning. The real question is if you had to kill your clone before it took over your life is that suicide or murder.

 

[captainscarlett]

If you believe that sexuality is a genetic disposition, which is the current politically correct view, then all members of a clone group will be identical sexuality according to genetic make-up.

If you believe that sexuality is an acquired trait conditioned by life experiences then, of course, the clone group may contain a mix of inclinations. However, if you do believe this then don't tell anyone, because you may get lynched for suggesting that homosexuality can be "cured", since acquired traits can be reversed.

Actually you are completely wrong and have completely misconstrued what I said. My point was that each individual clone may have slightly different kinks, fetishes, and proclivities because each may have had different encounters at different times in their development.

You decided to run off and grind your personal axe about straight and gay people, something I didn't even mention.

I know many sets of twins and even though they are genetically similar they can have very different sexual mores, kinks, and even sometimes gender preferences.

Please refrain from overtly interpreting only negative connotations.