Clinton vs Giuliani

leZilla

..
Joined
Mar 8, 2006
Posts
7,888
Does anyone else have the gut feeling that this is all going to come down to Clinton vs. Giuliani?

And if it does, Clinton is going to kick his ass.

My predictions at this point.
 
leZilla said:
Does anyone else have the gut feeling that this is all going to come down to Clinton vs. Giuliani?

And if it does, Clinton is going to kick his ass.

My predictions at this point.
Clinton is an idiot. Her choking on the last debate proved that. She has zero skills and zero credibility. I take that back, she is a great marketer. She knows who to pay off to get her way. Just like her dirtbag husband.
 
leZilla said:
Does anyone else have the gut feeling that this is all going to come down to Clinton vs. Giuliani?
And thus will my nightmare be realized.
 
leZilla said:
Does anyone else have the gut feeling that this is all going to come down to Clinton vs. Giuliani?

And if it does, Clinton is going to kick his ass.

My predictions at this point.


I think you are correct. The Candidates with the most to spend on propaganda win.
 
DevilishTexan said:
Clinton is an idiot. Her choking on the last debate proved that. She has zero skills and zero credibility. I take that back, she is a great marketer. She knows who to pay off to get her way. Just like her dirtbag husband.
She looked pretty good until that question about what Bill had classified in the archives, but then the wheels came off, and by the time the driver's license issue was raised she was in deep trouble. Her faithful will look past it, but she's not doing much to win the undecided voters over, clearly.

Of course, most of them came off like idiots last night; the only two who sounded like diplomats and/or leaders were Biden and Obama. Somebody needs to tell Kucinich to get help.
 
Don't get me wrong - I don't like Clinton. I don't trust her.

She has potential to be a good president, but I still just don't like the bitch.

But when the alternative is Giuliani, wtf are we supposed to do?
 
leZilla said:
But when the alternative is Giuliani, wtf are we supposed to do?
Rule of thumb:

When a candidate, such as Giuliani, suggests his opponents lack something, such as experience, there's a better than 50/50 chance he's subconsciously revealing his theory about his (or her) own weakness.
 
LukkyKnight said:
She looked pretty good until that question about what Bill had classified in the archives, but then the wheels came off, and by the time the driver's license issue was raised she was in deep trouble. Her faithful will look past it, but she's not doing much to win the undecided voters over, clearly.

Of course, most of them came off like idiots last night; the only two who sounded like diplomats and/or leaders were Biden and Obama. Somebody needs to tell Kucinich to get help.
And Biden has his script and Obama can't even put his hand on his heart for the pledge of allegiance. Yeah, great candidate there.

At least I'm not afraid if Giuliani wins it. Thompson is my man but Giuliani will do a good job I believe. We're tremendously fucked if Hillary wins. I'm moving to Australia if that happens.
 
leZilla said:
Don't get me wrong - I don't like Clinton. I don't trust her.

She has potential to be a good president, but I still just don't like the bitch.

But when the alternative is Giuliani, wtf are we supposed to do?
Maybe because your women's intuition is telling you she's a lying, cheating, criminalistic, opportunistic pig?
 
I dont really like Clinton either but i sure as hell aint voting for the other party that is doing everything they can to kill porn and gambling on the internet when it is our right to look at and choose what we do lol.
 
Biggest problem is only around 30% of the males bother to vote. I'll book Quantas for us DT.
 
DevilishTexan said:
And Biden has his script and Obama can't even put his hand on his heart for the pledge of allegiance. Yeah, great candidate there.

At least I'm not afraid if Giuliani wins it. Thompson is my man but Giuliani will do a good job I believe. We're tremendously fucked if Hillary wins. I'm moving to Australia if that happens.
~LOL~ Make all you want to out of the pledge of allegiance, most major league players are blowing bubbles while the national anthem plays. As to scripts, they all go into debates intent on making one or more points, and they mostly do so, just like Bush responding with talking point style non-answers in his so-called news conferences. Biden stung you with the "noun, verb, 9/11" comment, I take it?
 
Obama will get the nomination.

DevilishTexan said:
We're tremendously fucked if Hillary wins. I'm moving to Australia if that happens.
Quoted for posterity.

MrBrooks said:
I dont really like Clinton either but i sure as hell aint voting for the other party that is doing everything they can to kill porn and gambling on the internet when it is our right to look at and choose what we do lol.
Thank you! Why vote Republican if you like being here?
 
LukkyKnight said:
~LOL~ Make all you want to out of the pledge of allegiance, most major league players are blowing bubbles while the national anthem plays. As to scripts, they all go into debates intent on making one or more points, and they mostly do so, just like Bush responding with talking point style non-answers in his so-called news conferences. Biden stung you with the "noun, verb, 9/11" comment, I take it?
Didn't sting me. Thats something I would have said just off the cuff because I'm quick like that, he's not.

And Obama is NOT a major league player. ;)
 
DevilishTexan said:
Didn't sting me. Thats something I would have said just off the cuff because I'm quick like that, he's not.

And Obama is NOT a major league player. ;)
Well, DT, if the Senate isn't the major leagues I don't know what is, but since you're smarter and quicker than Biden I'll just wait for you to explain it to me.
 
LukkyKnight said:
Well, DT, if the Senate isn't the major leagues I don't know what is, but since you're smarter and quicker than Biden I'll just wait for you to explain it to me.
I'd win. Because I wouldn't bullshit the public and can answer straight forward questions the first time. And NOT change the subject. Every one of the Democratic candidates suck because none of them can do this.
 
LukkyKnight said:
Well, DT, if the Senate isn't the major leagues I don't know what is, but since you're smarter and quicker than Biden I'll just wait for you to explain it to me.
Evidently it's not just the democratic candidates that can't answer straightforward questions without changing the subject.

Still waiting patiently, DT.
 
Hillary's VP choice will be Sen. Evan Bayh from Indiana, he is a little smarter then Dan Quail.
 
LukkyKnight said:
Evidently it's not just the democratic candidates that can't answer straightforward questions without changing the subject.

Still waiting patiently, DT.
You can wait till the cows come home. What, being a Senator for what, two years makes him capable? Senators don't do shit but pay off lobbyists and take vacations.

Neither Obama or Clinton have the experience to run their own budget much less the countries.
 
DevilishTexan said:
You can wait till the cows come home. What, being a Senator for what, two years makes him capable? Senators don't do shit but pay off lobbyists and take vacations.

Neither Obama or Clinton have the experience to run their own budget much less the countries.
No, the question was about what constitutes the big leagues, since you implied being in the Senate wasn't tantamount to it. Just what is the measure of enough experience? Just what is the major league that qualifies a person to run for president?

Are you suggesting that Senators are somehow less pure than, say, Governors, or Mayors?
 
VermilionSkye said:
I'm all about voting for Obama.

This could all change, but if we were voting today, I think voting for Obama would be unwise.

I like Obama better than Clinton. However, he just does not have the experience. He's too young, he's too easily persuaved, he just doesn't have the experience necesarry to run a country. Don't get me wrong, I love that guy. He's what our country needs. But we need him in 10 years from now. Not next year. He needs to learn, experience, age, gain wisdom.

I do, however, fucking hate Obama's wife. She is a nitpicking, negative, undermining bitch.

I still have a John Kerry sticker on my bumper, and I an a long way off from slapping someone else on top of him.

Edwards doesn't have a chance in hell.

I think when Gore and Edwards ran the ticket was backwards. I think when Kerry and Edwards ran the ticket was backwards.

It's too goddamn late now though. Edwards doesn't have a shot in hell. Even though I think he would make a good president, and I really do believe that, I'm not going to support a lost cause.

It's a crying bloody shame.

Watch the next president be republican. Watch and weep. Dems just can't get their shit together. It's sad, but true.

Part of the problems is libs and dems are too fucking lazy and self involved to get out and vote.

MTV trying to get kids to vote? WTF? Puff Daddy gonna sign you up?

The kids who are of age to vote today are self aborbed, don't believe one vote means shit, and too apathetic to vote.

That's why antichrists like Bush are in office today.

I'm a dem, but the dems and libs have nobody but themselves to blame when it comes to the antichrist Bush being in office.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top