Clinton Fatigue

J

JAMESBJOHNSON

Guest
With the 2016 election 2 years away, how soon before youre infected with Clinton fatigue?
 
She'll lose, like she did last time. Like last time, she's been shitting the bed while projecting the idea that she's the "inevitable" nominee. 2008 taught her precisely 0 lessons.
 
I hope she doesn't run, because I think she's too old. I think those running the county should have a personal interest in the future effects of the policies they advocate. No one over 65 should be in public office.

But if she runs, it will be a cake-walk.
 
I hope she doesn't run, because I think she's too old. I think those running the county should have a personal interest in the future effects of the policies they advocate. No one over 65 should be in public office.

But if she runs, it will be a cake-walk.

For the GOP. She was beat by an unknown nigger last time.
 
I hope she doesn't run, because I think she's too old. I think those running the county should have a personal interest in the future effects of the policies they advocate. No one over 65 should be in public office.

But if she runs, it will be a cake-walk.

All the Dems being mentioned as possible candidates will be over 65 by election day. The GOP candidates are much younger.
 
I think the US has had enough of the Clintons and Bush's....


I certain hope that they are NOT the two party candidates.
 
Hillary Clinton has double-digit leads over potential GOP presidential rivals

The Washington Post
January 22, 2015

Hillary Rodham Clinton holds double-digit leads over potential Republican challengers Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney as the likely Democratic presidential candidate moves closer to entering the 2016 race, a new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds...

Clinton approaches the nominating season in a dominant position, leading Bush by 54 percent to 41 percent among registered voters and Romney by 55 percent to 40 percent.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...df44e2-a190-11e4-9f89-561284a573f8_story.html

:D:D:D
 
Gonna be Clinton v Bush again.

Who's gonna play the part of Dan Quayle?
 
Walker vs Warren. Wisconsin governor that beat back dem's/union thugs three different times against a bat shit crazy, far left, Obama cheerleading, Massachusetts progressive that lied about her "native American" heritage. Seriously folks, this bitch be crazy.

I see absolutely no way that Hillary makes it through the primaries as the dem nominee, especially with people like David Brock jumping ship from the USS Sinking Clinton. As far as Jeb goes, well, what's the difference in nominating John McCain once again as opposed to Jeb? If the repub's want to surrender the White House for another eight years then fine, nominate a rhino like Jeb.
 
Warren is a Marxist, no way can she be elected. More like to see Jerry Brown instead of Warren as the nominee.

Vette it'll be most interesting if this happens. Everything I'm hearing and gathering, however, is that apparently the democratic establishment are pushing Warren forward while pushing Hillary out. But, who knows?
 
Warren is a Marxist, no way can she be elected. More like to see Jerry Brown instead of Warren as the nominee.

All the Dems being mentioned prominently are old. Warren will be 67 at the time of the election, which is not a record, but it is close to one. If she gets the nomination, comics will have a field day talking about going on the warpath. And it won't be anything racist. They will be making fun of her for her bogus claim to being a Native American. I think she might be 1/32 Cherokee, or something like that, and has never been involved in tribal affairs and has always described herself as Caucasian. That was until it became expedient (Affirmative Action) for her to claim to be an American Indian.

Moonbeam is even older than she and Biden is looked on as a buffoon, much as Dan Quayle was. If Hillary does get the nomination, it will be because she is the least sorry of a truly sorry lot. :eek:
 
This is probably true, since the Democrat Party is now controlled by the extreme left...<snip>

Well, well, well....it would seem queerbait is gonna have some serious competition for the "Stupidest Post Of The Month" award as vetty turns in this gem.
 
No one can surpass your level o stupidity when it comes to posting.

The Democratic Party ousted their extreme liberal wing after their drubbing in the 1972 election debacle, which saw the rise of "super-delegates" designed to limit the influence of the fringe.

A lesson the Republicans have yet to learn, I would point out.

Your blather that the Democratic party is somehow in the thrall of the mythical "Extreme Left" is, like most everything else that comes out of your mouth, not supported by facts.

p.s. when lecturing others on their purported "stupidity", it is prudent to review your own post for simple spelling and grammar errors.
 
Back
Top